• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How statutes affect contractual terms and the meaning of the terms in a contract.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction In this I am going to describe the how statutes affect contractual terms and the meaning of the terms in a contract. Implied terms * The form part of the contract, express terms must be incorporated into the contract * If the contract is written then this presents no problem since the terms are in written form * Where the contract is oral, a number of factors can be taken into account in determining whether or not representations have been less incorporated. Generally, the parties to a contract will be deemed to have included all of the various obligations by which they intend to be as express terms of the contract. There are, however, occasions when terms will be implied into a contract , even though they do not appear in a written agreement or in the oral negotiations that have taken place leading up to the contract. ...read more.


Terms implied by fact Where terms are implied by fact, this is usually as a result of decisions in individual court cases. The courts have implied terms by fact in a variety of different circumstances. Terms implied by law- by statute In the 19th century the law of contract was most commonly governed. The law was very much concerned with the process of contracting and little attention was paid to the fact that in many circumstances one party to the contract was in a significantly interior bargaining position to the party. Early statutes such as the Sale of Goods Act 1893 did attempt to redress this imbalance. In late half of the 20th century there has been much more awareness of the needs of consumers, employees and others in contractual relationships. ...read more.


Such terms can be particularly harsh on the party subject to them and they often highlight the inequality of bargaining that can exist between different parties notably provides of goods and services and consumers. Even where statute intervened to create protections for the consumer, as in the Sale of Goods Act 1893, the sellers' superior position was generally preserved. Although s55 of the 1893 Act allowed sellers to exclude liability for breaches of the implied conditions in the Act . As a result, judges gradually developed rules to prevent sellers having an unfettered discretion to avoid liability for their contractual breaches. More recently, a general trend towards consumer protection has seen the introduction of more effective statutory controls and the UK has also had to implement controls created in European law. Judicial controls, though, are still effective in limitations the use of exclusion clauses. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Civil Obligations - Agreements

    Inman [1908] 2 KB 1. The nature of the minor's liability for necessary goods is uncertain. The Sale of Goods Act makes him liable only for goods that are "sold and delivered" and to pay, not any agreed price, but a reasonable price.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    It is neither a bill nor a note; but if attested, it can be sued on either as a bond or a promissory note. A Shah Jog Hundi differs from a bill in two respects, namely, (i) the acceptance of the drawee is not generally written across it but the particulars are entered in the drawer's book, and (ii)

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    All the facts alleged in the indictment must be precisely proved. An indictment must be signed by an officer of the Crown Court, and is usually drawn up after a defendant is committed for trial by jury by examining magistrates.

  2. Irish cases which discuss the meaning of intention

    so far as in him lies, to bring about, and which, in point of possibility, he has a reasonable prospect of being able to bring about by his own act of volition." Lord Hailsham also indicated that foresight of probable consequences was not the same as intention.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work