• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to the offence of murder discuss the suggestion that the law is in urgent need of reform

Extracts from this document...


In relation to the offence of murder discuss the suggestion that the law is in urgent need of reform The definition of murder is derived from the explanation by Sir Edward Coke who expressed "Murder is when a (person)...unlawfully killeth..any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the Queen's peace, with malice aforethought.." - this is essentially; the unlawful killing of a human being. However, the conundrum this provides is the actus reus of murder; in that there is no distinction of the severity or gravity of the crime. This definition raises several points that require further consideration, as there are many anomalies and thought concepts that are now out dated. Coke's definition of murder used to provide that the death of the victim had to occur within a year and a day of the actus reus; so when this definition was originated the "year and a day rule" was sufficient, however with modern technology life may be maintained for longer, so already this anomaly has been reformed under the Law Reform Act (Year and a Day Rule) 1996 as the time frame was no longer relevant. ...read more.


Therefore if someone breaks another person's arm and that person subsequently dies then the aggressor is guilty of murder even if they did not want that person to die. As Lord Edmund-Davies commented in R v Cunningham (1982) AC566, 'I find it passing strange that a person can be convicted of murder if death results from, say, his intentional breaking of another's arm, an action, which, while calling for severe punishment, would in most cases be unlikely to kill.' This does raise the question of principle. However, if the intention is there, then the malice is there, providing conditional intent. 'The jury may find evidence of intent that D perceives his act will virtually certainly lead to really serious harm'. Juries are often unwilling to convict on this and will give the benefit of the doubt. Within the law there are three ways to qualify for murder. Firstly, murder requires intention, and nothing less will suffice -R v Moloney (1985) 1 AC 905. Secondly, section 8 Criminal Justice Act 1967 provides that intention is a subjective test. Thirdly, R v Nedrick (1986) ...read more.


However, there are possible law reforms within the draft criminal code 1989 that state that mens rea should be reformed with a move towards defining intention. This would give the judge more influence in stating as a certainty of what the law is - rather than a jury that is only "entitled" to find evidence of intent. Solutions for reforms may involve that there are degrees of murder as in America. Thus there would be different sentences for mercy killing and a maliciously planned murder. However this raises the dilemma of would this unnecessarily complicate the law by offering a way out for criminals or would it offer a solution that is more understanding of circumstances. This area was slightly reformed in 2004 when partial defences of provocation and diminished responsibility for lower degrees of blame were introduced. In conclusion, it would seem that there is not an urgent need of reform even though there are possible faults at present with ambiguity. Also the uncertainty of intent and that there is no discrimination between these intentions do require clarification and perhaps considered as manslaughter. The law in relation to murder has worked for hundreds of years and as with all law has constantly been adapted. ?? ?? ?? ?? Victoria McAlister ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good essay, but the student could have also considered the mandatory life sentence (some have called for its abolition) and self-defence and the Tony Martin debate.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury ...

    5 star(s)

    Jury selection can provide a solution here by ensuring those who are chosen are also eligible which will reduce the bias created by the random selection of jury members. It is clear that although in theory the random selection of jurors seems like the better option in gaining representative verdicts, in practice this is not so.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    However, judges tend to avoid departing from previous precedents unless those precedents were truly in the wrong, had created injustice and there were new material facts to show that the precedents were no longer good law such as in the cases of Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association [1999]HL and Bellinger v.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The three main rules of statutory interpretation are the literal rule, the golden rule ...

    3 star(s)

    The mischief rule allows the judges to consider four points before applying the statute: (a) What was the law before the statute was passed? (b)What problem is the statute trying to remedy? (c)What was the remedy that Parliament was trying to provide in passing the Act?

  2. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    you will be put into the defendant box to the right of the magistrates, followed by your defending solicitor. Next the prosecuting solicitor will enter and seat himself next to your lawyer.

  1. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    However the portrayal of the corpse with the subtitle is again manipulative as it prevents the audience from coming up with an impartial decision, as it is impossible to regard a corpse as humane. Another important section of this scene was the element on The Vietnam war that still plays

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    INTRODUCTION "The reasonable man or reasonable person standard is a legal fiction that originated in the development of the common law. The reasonable person is a hypothetical individual whose view of things is consulted in the process of making decisions of law.

  1. Is the imposition of strict liability ever justifiable in criminal law?

    as potential offenders are aware that if any prosecution is brought against them, there is a good chance of conviction, due to the nature of strict liability. Elliot and Quinn (p.33.1) tell us that 'strict liability makes enforcing offences easier.'

  2. Should guns be banned in America?

    A ban on firearms might not be appealing as a short-term solution but it is important that people don't limit their thinking to their generation and not think about the safety of their children, grandchildren and the society people are creating today for them to live in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work