• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to the offence of murder discuss the suggestion that the law is in urgent need of reform

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In relation to the offence of murder discuss the suggestion that the law is in urgent need of reform The definition of murder is derived from the explanation by Sir Edward Coke who expressed "Murder is when a (person)...unlawfully killeth..any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the Queen's peace, with malice aforethought.." - this is essentially; the unlawful killing of a human being. However, the conundrum this provides is the actus reus of murder; in that there is no distinction of the severity or gravity of the crime. This definition raises several points that require further consideration, as there are many anomalies and thought concepts that are now out dated. Coke's definition of murder used to provide that the death of the victim had to occur within a year and a day of the actus reus; so when this definition was originated the "year and a day rule" was sufficient, however with modern technology life may be maintained for longer, so already this anomaly has been reformed under the Law Reform Act (Year and a Day Rule) 1996 as the time frame was no longer relevant. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore if someone breaks another person's arm and that person subsequently dies then the aggressor is guilty of murder even if they did not want that person to die. As Lord Edmund-Davies commented in R v Cunningham (1982) AC566, 'I find it passing strange that a person can be convicted of murder if death results from, say, his intentional breaking of another's arm, an action, which, while calling for severe punishment, would in most cases be unlikely to kill.' This does raise the question of principle. However, if the intention is there, then the malice is there, providing conditional intent. 'The jury may find evidence of intent that D perceives his act will virtually certainly lead to really serious harm'. Juries are often unwilling to convict on this and will give the benefit of the doubt. Within the law there are three ways to qualify for murder. Firstly, murder requires intention, and nothing less will suffice -R v Moloney (1985) 1 AC 905. Secondly, section 8 Criminal Justice Act 1967 provides that intention is a subjective test. Thirdly, R v Nedrick (1986) ...read more.

Conclusion

However, there are possible law reforms within the draft criminal code 1989 that state that mens rea should be reformed with a move towards defining intention. This would give the judge more influence in stating as a certainty of what the law is - rather than a jury that is only "entitled" to find evidence of intent. Solutions for reforms may involve that there are degrees of murder as in America. Thus there would be different sentences for mercy killing and a maliciously planned murder. However this raises the dilemma of would this unnecessarily complicate the law by offering a way out for criminals or would it offer a solution that is more understanding of circumstances. This area was slightly reformed in 2004 when partial defences of provocation and diminished responsibility for lower degrees of blame were introduced. In conclusion, it would seem that there is not an urgent need of reform even though there are possible faults at present with ambiguity. Also the uncertainty of intent and that there is no discrimination between these intentions do require clarification and perhaps considered as manslaughter. The law in relation to murder has worked for hundreds of years and as with all law has constantly been adapted. ?? ?? ?? ?? Victoria McAlister ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good essay, but the student could have also considered the mandatory life sentence (some have called for its abolition) and self-defence and the Tony Martin debate.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    practicable to communicate with any person entitled to grant access to the evidence; - the purpose of a search may be frustrated or seriously prejudiced unless a constable arriving at the premises can secure immediate entry to them. To enter or search of premises under a warrant is unlawful unless

  2. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    you will be put into the defendant box to the right of the magistrates, followed by your defending solicitor. Next the prosecuting solicitor will enter and seat himself next to your lawyer.

  1. Is the imposition of strict liability ever justifiable in criminal law?

    tell us that 'strict liability makes enforcing offences easier.' In Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G (1985), the defendants were involved in building works in Hong Kong. A part of the building they had constructed fell down, and it was found that the collapse of the building had occurred because the builders had failed to follow original plans exactly.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Both convicted M appealed - said judge didn't give Nedrick direction Judge was right - not exceptional case (not oblique intention) COA said this was not a rare and exceptional case where N direction was needed. In cases were there is a direct attack on victim, it was unlikely that

  1. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    Later criminologists have tended to draw on sociology by considering social structure and culture (anomie, alienation, or labelling theory, for example) or on psychology by considering the effects of childhood experience (socialization)

  2. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    For assault and battery the maximum sentence is six months imprisonment, whereas section 47 is up to five years, the only difference being that in section 47 ABH is caused. Even though ABH can be as little as causing discomfort there is an increase of four and a half years on the maximum sentence.

  1. 'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

    This example also demonstrates another point that journalists should be aware of, to ensure their witnesses are prepared to give evidence. It is often the case that their account of events stands for more than the defendants ie. the journalist.

  2. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    When the war concluded, new methods of execution were introduced, and the first electric chair method was utilized in New York for the execution of William Kemmler. Capital Punishment was officially abolished in 1972 under the case of Furman v.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work