• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to the offence of murder discuss the suggestion that the law is in urgent need of reform

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In relation to the offence of murder discuss the suggestion that the law is in urgent need of reform The definition of murder is derived from the explanation by Sir Edward Coke who expressed "Murder is when a (person)...unlawfully killeth..any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the Queen's peace, with malice aforethought.." - this is essentially; the unlawful killing of a human being. However, the conundrum this provides is the actus reus of murder; in that there is no distinction of the severity or gravity of the crime. This definition raises several points that require further consideration, as there are many anomalies and thought concepts that are now out dated. Coke's definition of murder used to provide that the death of the victim had to occur within a year and a day of the actus reus; so when this definition was originated the "year and a day rule" was sufficient, however with modern technology life may be maintained for longer, so already this anomaly has been reformed under the Law Reform Act (Year and a Day Rule) 1996 as the time frame was no longer relevant. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore if someone breaks another person's arm and that person subsequently dies then the aggressor is guilty of murder even if they did not want that person to die. As Lord Edmund-Davies commented in R v Cunningham (1982) AC566, 'I find it passing strange that a person can be convicted of murder if death results from, say, his intentional breaking of another's arm, an action, which, while calling for severe punishment, would in most cases be unlikely to kill.' This does raise the question of principle. However, if the intention is there, then the malice is there, providing conditional intent. 'The jury may find evidence of intent that D perceives his act will virtually certainly lead to really serious harm'. Juries are often unwilling to convict on this and will give the benefit of the doubt. Within the law there are three ways to qualify for murder. Firstly, murder requires intention, and nothing less will suffice -R v Moloney (1985) 1 AC 905. Secondly, section 8 Criminal Justice Act 1967 provides that intention is a subjective test. Thirdly, R v Nedrick (1986) ...read more.

Conclusion

However, there are possible law reforms within the draft criminal code 1989 that state that mens rea should be reformed with a move towards defining intention. This would give the judge more influence in stating as a certainty of what the law is - rather than a jury that is only "entitled" to find evidence of intent. Solutions for reforms may involve that there are degrees of murder as in America. Thus there would be different sentences for mercy killing and a maliciously planned murder. However this raises the dilemma of would this unnecessarily complicate the law by offering a way out for criminals or would it offer a solution that is more understanding of circumstances. This area was slightly reformed in 2004 when partial defences of provocation and diminished responsibility for lower degrees of blame were introduced. In conclusion, it would seem that there is not an urgent need of reform even though there are possible faults at present with ambiguity. Also the uncertainty of intent and that there is no discrimination between these intentions do require clarification and perhaps considered as manslaughter. The law in relation to murder has worked for hundreds of years and as with all law has constantly been adapted. ?? ?? ?? ?? Victoria McAlister ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good essay, but the student could have also considered the mandatory life sentence (some have called for its abolition) and self-defence and the Tony Martin debate.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The three main rules of statutory interpretation are the literal rule, the golden rule ...

    3 star(s)

    The reason for the popularity of this rule is that, the judges are not supposed to make law. There is always the danger that a particular interpretation may be equivalent of making law, and instead of doing that some judges prefer to stick to the literal rule and avoid this danger.

  2. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    you will be put into the defendant box to the right of the magistrates, followed by your defending solicitor. Next the prosecuting solicitor will enter and seat himself next to your lawyer.

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    INTRODUCTION "The reasonable man or reasonable person standard is a legal fiction that originated in the development of the common law. The reasonable person is a hypothetical individual whose view of things is consulted in the process of making decisions of law.

  2. Consumer Protection Act 1987 This act states that the sellers are liable to any ...

    For example, if Tesco's packet or advertisement states something like by using this cream it gets rid of wrinkles and the product does not get rid of wrinkles the, the product is not doing what it was described to do, then Tesco are breaking the law.

  1. "Discuss the meaning and constitutional significance of the rule of law. Illustrate your answer ...

    (Reference in bibliography) The rule of law lastly means that the general principles of the constitution are the result of judicial decision of the courts in England. In many countries right such as right to personal liberty, freedom from arrest, freedom to hold public meeting are guaranteed by a written constitution; in England, it is not so.

  2. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    This might not be so easy. One of the earliest accounts of this ordeal describes how the accused 'plunged his right hand into the cauldron. In the bubbling it was not easy for him to grasp the little ring but at last he drew it out'.

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    When the war concluded, new methods of execution were introduced, and the first electric chair method was utilized in New York for the execution of William Kemmler. Capital Punishment was officially abolished in 1972 under the case of Furman v.

  2. The Poor Law was a system established since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, ...

    But concerned ratepayers suggested that these two sections were one way in which vested interests were exploiting the system. This led to criticisms towards these as it was believed that tradesmen would give out more food than what was appointed to each person, therefore the government cost would be higher

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work