• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In your view, how satisfactory is the current law on theft?

Extracts from this document...


A Level Law Homework 8 Analysis of Property Offences (a) In your view, how satisfactory is the current law on theft? (25 marks) The main purpose of the law of theft is to make members of the public feel secure in possession of their property. The Theft Act 1968, although does this quite well, has many flaws in it. Regarding the element of appropriation there are mixed weaknesses and strengths. Firstly you can appropriate your own property if it is in control or possession of another. This is generally a good thing. For example in the case of Turner he took his car to be repaired and later drove it off the forecourt without paying for the services. Because it was in control and possession of the mechanic he had stolen his own car. A confusing element of this element is the mixed definitions of appropriation. Section 3 (1) of the Theft act 1968 defines appropriation as assuming the rights of the owner. Morris says that appropriation must be unauthorised to fall within the meaning of theft and in Gomez the Law Lords came to a very wide, perhaps too wide definition, saying that it was help to mean an assumption of any of the rights of the owner, even if the owner consents. ...read more.


Regarding the intention to permanently deprive is it about the passage of time i.e. how long you keep the property, or about taking the goodness i.e. the value, out of the property. Three cases may actually help to some extent but all have actually come up with a different conclusion. Lloyd, who took films from the cinema and returned them unchanged, said that all the value must be rendered to be theft. Bagshaw, who borrowed gas cylinders and returned them after using some gas, said that most of the value must be rendered. Lavender, who took council door from one flat and put them on his girlfriends council flat, too one step further to say only some value must be rendered. A simple reform, suggested in the case Gianville Williams, would be to remove the word permanently to save confusion and then the defendant would simply have to deprive the victim of something. Dishonest has no definition but we do have the Ghosh Test to help juries if needed. This test is very confusing. It is a two stage test with an objective part and a subjective part to it, both need to be confirmed for the defendant to be found dishonest. However the objective part is not really needed as the subjective part can override it. ...read more.


This became an amendment to the Theft Act (1996). The problem with the offence of obtaining services by deception is that it needs to cover situations where there is no obvious property involved, e.g. a haircut. Services are provided on the basis they will be paid for and for a conviction the deception takes place before the services are provided. But 'gratuitous' services are not included in this definition, which is where misrepresentation tends to lead to a free service being given, usually a mortgage. It is also difficult to understand the ways in which tree offences would apply to evading liability by deception. There is an overlap between section 1 (a) and section 2 (b) as both are based on existing liability to make payment. Only section 2 1(b) involves the idea of an intention to not make payment a. Maybe they should consider abolishing section 2 and use the civil to pursue liability. When it comes to making off payment there must be an intention to avoid payment permanently as in the case of Allen (1985). In this case it was obvious that the defendant intended to pay at some point as he left his belongings, including his passport, at the hotel and phoned explaining that he would pay his bill as soon as the money from his business came through. However in other situations it may be difficult to establish and it requires a view about future intentions. Nicole O'Brien ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    judge said it was different to Nedrick because there were 2 pieced of evidence relating to the AR. 1) Initially denied all knowledge (Had guilt in his mind) 2) Then confessed Criminal Justice Act 1967 - 'Jury must consider all evidence ...

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Our local Police Service will be carrying peacekeeping activities, which are vital to maintain the security of the community, most of the time. An example of this is on Friday and Saturday nights in the town centres, where Police Officers are not only acting as a visual deterrent but also

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The particulars that a protest must contain are:- 1. The instrument itself, or a literal transcript thereof. 2. The names of the parties for and against whom the instrument has been protested. 3. The fact and reasons for dishonor. 4.

  2. Law : Juries & Judges

    This sort of excusal to jury service is called a discretionary excusal, since it is up to the court whether you may get excused or not. In this situation the court is more likely to defer your jury service to a later date, rather than excusing you altogether.

  1. Critically evaluate the changes which have been made since 1990 to the definition of ...

    on the grounds that the trial contravened European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Article 7(1). In 2002 the defendant was convicted of the rape of his wife during the time they were married from 1967 until 1971. The appeal arose from the trial judge's refusal to say the count of rape was an abuse of process.

  2. prisoners rights

    They represent one of the most successful applications of the principle of individualization of penalties with a view to social readjustment. It has been said so because release of offenders on probation, home leave to prisoners, introduction of wage system, release on parole, educational, moral and vocational training of prisoners

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    from a friend should the accused fail to return to court to answer the bail. In England and Wales, a deposit of money may no longer be taken from the accused. The process of determining the outcome of the case also takes place in the magistrate's court.

  2. Is Diminished Responsibility Relevant?

    The psychiatrist believed also that he was suffering from an abnormality of the mind in that he was suffering from two significant psychiatric conditions, namely Borderline Personality Disorder and Amphetamine-induced Psychotic Disorder. The former would not necessarily be enough to consider the partial defence of Diminished Responsibility but that when

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work