• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have to define what is common law? What are the defects of common law, and to what extend equity have been created.

Extracts from this document...


Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have to define what is common law? What are the defects of common law, and to what extend equity have been created. From the development of common law and equity, what has been the effects of the Judicature Acts 1873-1875? What are the equitable maxims that are needed to be satisfied? What are the various kind of equitable remedies that have been developed? During the Norman Conquest, circuit judges have been travelling from one county court to another in order to settle disputes. Later, common law courts have been developed which apply common laws. In common law courts, if a plaintiff were to bring an action to court, it need to be started by a writ which sets out the ground claims made or it sets out the cause of action. New writs were often created to suit new circumstances. But soon, the creation of new writs have been halted by parliament the supreme body, when the Provision of Oxford 1258 was passed. It is because the creation of new writs eroded the parliament power from enacting laws. Hence, the litigants need to suit their circumstances based on the existing available writs. They need to suit their case squarely into the writ, or else there will be no way of bringing an action to court. ...read more.


The act had fused the administration of common law and equity. All the courts in the country, will be able to grant common law and equitable remedies. There will not be different procedures, if a plaintiff wants to apply either for common law or equitable remedies. There are equitable maxims that need to be satisfied, before equity rules are applied in the court. These maxims are to ensure consistency and predictability in the law. It is also to ensure that decisions are made morally fair. The maxims are, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands, he who seeks equity must do equity and delay defeats equity. For the first maxim, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands can be construded as when a plaintiff have been themselves in the wrong, equitable remedies will not be granted. In Rees v D&C Builders, the building firm did some work for the Rees couple. The couple had paid proportion from the full amount. When the builders have accomplished their job, they asked for the balance payment from the couple, but the couple refuse to pay the balance of the full amount as they claimed that the builders have done the work deficiently. Hence, the builders reluctantly accepted the amount that the couple is willing to pay as the builders were having financial difficulties. ...read more.


Another example will be the Anton Piller order, which order the defendant to allow the plaintiff's solicitor's to enter into premises to extract relevant incriminating documents relating to the defendant's infringing acts. In additional to that, while for rectification, when a transaction is embodied in a written instrument which, by mistake, does not express the true agreement of the parties, the remedy of rectification is necessary to show that both parties were in complete agreement. No 3rd parties shall involve. Besides that, recission here involve in a contract contains an inherent cause of validity, for example fraud, which makes it voidable at the suit of one parties. If and when that party declares his intention not to be bound by the contract, he is said to rescind it. It places both parties to the position in which they stood before the contract was entered into. Specific performance, is an order to a person to fulfil his obligations under a contract. For example, when contracts have been exchanged for the sale of a house, the court may order a reluctant seller to complete the sale. Hence, the development of changes from common law to equity has benefited the whole society largely as they will be able to seek better redress. It also ensures flexibility in the law as equitable remedies are discretionary. This subject to, thou a plaintiff maybe awarded the common law remedy, but the court have the discretion to chose whether is it just to award equitable remedies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    common sense inferences to be drawn therefrom - the presumption fully applies when it is my round and I buy you a pint, but no judge in his right mind will say that you hold that pint on trust for me.'

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    This can happen where the facts of the case in question are sufficiently different from the one dealt with by the lower court. 13. Give four advantages of case law. (Certainty - judicial precedent means that litigants can assume that like cases will be treated alike, rather than judges making their own random decisions which nobody could predict.

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    I am now going to explain to you what will happen at your court trial. First of all, your case will be held in a crown court because the murder of the civilian is a serious case. I will now go through the procedures of what will happen.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    The quicker the death following the provocation the better the defence. Case law for provocation R v Ibrams (1981) - (Timescale) The victim had threatened Ibrams and over long periods of time (5 - 7 days) they reported him to the police who did nothing Ibrams et al incapacitated there would-be attacker.

  1. Analysis of Performance - Badminton.

    Because I was hitting 30-40 shots per session, I was getting it to a rhythm and after the first 20 I was able to build in smashes and power. When training, you must build up in stages and not overload yourself with too much in the first week.

  2. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    It follows from the above discussion that Hart may well have attempted to resolve the problems so obvious with the Austinian model, however, as Raz in particular is keen to point out, Hart's theory appears to collapse into the same type of command theory, if a little different.

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    The pagan Saxons, however, require overt external agency to persuade them to accept the truth of Custance's faith, and Custance herself helps effect the initial conversions. After Christ converts Hermengyld (II.538-39), Custance emboldens her to perform his will and restore sight to the blind Briton (II.566).

  2. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    Equity acts in personam. This means that equity has jurisdiction over the defendant personally. In the leading case of Penn v Lord Baltimore3 which concerned a disagreement about a boundary line in the United States, at law the UK courts had no jurisdiction over there but because the defendant came

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work