• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Law
  • Word count: 4947

It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right to privacy recognised by English law[1] Privacy is a fundamental right of all human beings. It promotes human dignity and other values such as freedom of association

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right to privacy recognised by English law1 Privacy is a fundamental right of all human beings. It promotes human dignity and other values such as freedom of association and freedom of speech. The concept of privacy is recognised in one form or another in all legal systems. However the protection and the development of this concept vary from society to society. The need for privacy has long extended beyond the commercial context, and now applies to a wide range of circumstance, including the family and home. The desire for privacy and protection from invasion by the state, institutions as well as other individuals has long been a problem within the UK legal system. As British society is getting more and more complex, our privacy needs are growing. This means that the scope of our laws is stretching to accommodate this growth. Privacy is the fine line between a person's rights to lead his own life without intrusion, and the right for the surrounding public to be made aware of facts and circumstances which may have an effect on them, whether it is good or bad. This line is constantly moving and its boundaries are constantly stretched, not least by the difficulty that the courts have had in handling this issue2. The issue of privacy is in every part of law. Therefore I have chosen to narrow it down and trace the development of privacy law with regards to role models, and the press. I will analyse the development prior to the Human Rights Act 19983, discuss the impact of the HRA 1998, and also assess the implications of the Press Complaints Commission4. PRE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 Before going any further, it should be noted that there is no such thing as a "right to privacy" within the English legal system. ...read more.

Middle

In the case of Douglas v Hello, the courts recognised that individuals had a right to privacy, not as a freestanding part of law, but which was entrenched in the doctrine of breach of confidence, However the courts also recognised that in order to grant relief the courts have to take into account the relevant rights under the HRA 1998. His judgement did not indicate whether the right to privacy outweighs the right to freedom of expression. Therefore in this respect there is no presumption that the freedom of expression under the convention will be greater than the law of confidence. In essence his judgement states that there can be no clear balance between freedom of expression and the breach of confidence, but rather this is decided on a case-by-case basis when such cases come in front of the courts. Brook LJ stated that by virtue of the s.12 (4) of the HRA 1998 the courts have to pay particular regard to the Code of Practice of the PCC. He also said that where a newspaper breached the Code of Practice, then the court is likely to find in favour of the claimant. In the same case Keene LJ addressed whether therefore s12 of the HRA 1998 tipped the balance in favour of freedom of expression. In para 150 he said that "The subsection does not seek to give priority to one convention right over another...it is merely requiring the court to apply its mind to how one right is to balanced, on the merits against another". The decision of this case clearly pointed the way for the development of privacy rights via the concept of breach of confidence. The decision was subsequently relied on in Venables v New News Group Newspapers20 to impose an injunction preventing the publication of the new identities of two men convicted when they were children of murdering a toddler, Jamie Bulger. ...read more.

Conclusion

The tort would not be subject to a general defence of a public interest. It would be a defence, under the proposal to show that the act was done for the purpose of preventing, detecting or exposing the commission of a crime; or for the purpose of preventing the public from being misled by some public statement; or action of the individual concerned; or for the purpose of informing the public about some matters directly affecting the discharge of any public function of the individual concerned; or for the protection of the public health or safety; or under any lawful authority. Clearly, these defences are more tightly drawn than the broad public interest under the law of confidence. It should be noted that the tort would operate alongside confidence to provide a further restraint on freedom of speech. Word Count 4705 1 Glidewell LJ in Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62 2 http://www.lawdit.co.uk/reading_room/room/view_article.asp?name=../articles/Privacy.htm 3 Will be referred to as HRA 1998 from here on 4 Will be referred to as PCC from here on 5 Infra James Michael, p. 15. Justices of the Peace Act, 1361 (Eng.), 34 Edw. 3, c. 1 6 Speech on the Excise Bill, 1763. 7 http://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforcementguide/court/reporting/breach.htm 8 [1849] 1 Mac & G.25 9 [1967]] 1 Ch 302 10[1969] RPC 41 11 [1988] 2 ALL ER 477 12 AG v Guardian Newspaper Ltd [1988] Ch 33 13 [1988] 2 All ER 646 14 'Outing, Privacy and the First Amendment' [1992] Yale LJ 747 15 'Secrecy, Dignity & Autonomy? Views of Privacy as a Civil Liberty' 47 (2) CLP 16 Will be referred to as ECHR from here on 17 James Michael, Privacy and Human Rights (UNESCO 1994) p.1 18 [2001] 2 All ER 289 19 [1988] 3 All ER 545 20 [2001] ICHRL 3 21 http://www.pcc.org/about /whatis.html 22 [1977] 1 WLR 760 23 http://www.pcc.org/cop/cop.asp 24 http://www.pcc.org.uk/reports/latestdetails.asp?id=392 25 [1999] ICHRL 148 26 [2001] EWCA 2018 27 [2003] ECHR 28 [2002] 2 All ER 545 CA 29 [2001] HCA 63 30 [2004] UKHL 22 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    to the transfer of the quality from particular arguments to particular arguers. In the same way as we allow our immediate assessments of the reasonableness of people to be confronted with and sometimes corrected by our earlier and more considered assessments, so we allow our own assessments to be modified by those of others whom we respect.

  2. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    Following the CCTV footage, Moore reads out some statistics about the massacre such as the fact that 'over 900 rounds of ammunition were fired' and that all of the weapons and ammunition was 'legally purchased.' This is incredibly shocking for the viewer to hear and it persuades them to think

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Same as other Humphreys case. She leaves home very young - prostitute at 16 and living with her pimp at 17 He suggests to men pub to come back for group sex with her.

  2. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    The preamble has long recognised trusts for the advancement of education as charitable trusts. In order for a trust for the advancement of education to be charitable it must be for an educational purpose, fall within the spirit of the preamble and must be available to the public or a section of the community.

  1. Law in association with the criminalisation of certain drugs.

    Subsequently, in the nineteen twenties, legislation such as the Opium Proclamation 1926, were enacted pre-emptively and in compliance with international pressures.10 Throughout the remainder of the twentieth century, the statutes pertaining to the criminalisation of drugs continued to evolve. Prohibition was accepted as the only method of dealing with drugs,

  2. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    as shown in the case of Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd.6 Dealing with the right to express criticism of publicly elected bodies, the Court of Appeal held that the questioning by a newspaper of the official dealings of the council was legitimate criticism.

  1. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Forcing groups of male detainees to masturbate while being photographed and videotaped. ? Arranging naked male detainees in a pile and then jumping on them. ? Positioning a naked detainee on a MRE Box, with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers, toes, and penis to simulate electric torture.

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    But with patents being granted and ideas being protected, there is the rapid development of technology and science. But even then, there would be nothing to stop someone else from taking this intellectual property and using it for personal gain for themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work