• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Jury System Part 2

Extracts from this document...


How effective is the system of trial by jury? Are there any improvements that could be made or better alternatives that exist? The jury system has been in use for hundreds of years and was confirmed under Magna Carta 1215; however the system of trial by jury can be traced back to the reign of Henry II (1154-1189). The system by which we are familiar with today, i.e. juries giving verdicts on the basis of what is related to them by witnesses at the court hearing was coming into prominence in trials of serious offences as early as the fifteenth century. The jury is found in the Crown Court and sit for indictable offences. Juries consist of 12 people of either sex, swearing on the Bible or equivalent religious text, swear to: "Well and truly try the case and give a true verdict according to the evidence". The law on juries is governed by the Juries Act 1974, as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988 and the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Much comment has been made about the jury system and its effectiveness and value to society. In this essay I will attempt to explore the advantages and disadvantages, before finishing this essay with an evaluative passage to sum up my findings. ...read more.


A further example was R v Kronlid and Others (1996)- In this case Kronlid and others caused �1.5 million worth of damage to a fighter aircraft that was to be sold to the Indonesian Government. Kronlid successfully argued that the plane would be used to tyrannize the people of East Timor and was acquitted by the jury. All of the above are reasons as to why the jury system is advantageous. I will now explore disadvantages of the system. Firstly, as the selection for jury service (governed by section 1 of the Juries Act 1974 as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988) is totally down to chance, there is the realistic possibility that incompetent people, who are unable to deal with the court atmosphere, may be selected for jury service. This occurred in R v Chapman (1974) when a deaf juror sat through the trial without hearing a word of the trial. The Court of Appeal also decided that the juror had not prejudiced the trial and therefore the decision stood. After this case, Lord Denning caused for a suitability test to be introduced to decide on whether the juror is adequate to perform, however this could result in huge financial cost. Secondly retrials are very expensive. The jury do not have to agree, and should they disagree, a retrial would have to be arranged. ...read more.


Here are four suggested alternatives and their accompanying disadvantages: * Single Judge- this alternative means that there would be only one viewpoint towards the outcome; also, a judge sees the trial only in a legal context. * Panel of Judges- These would be hugely expensive, way too much to be able to be realistically paid. Also, the judges would act purely with a professional view. * Judge and lay jurors- this would be problematic, as the judge would dominate the discussion. * 'Professional' Jurors- this would also be problematic, as the jury would become casehardened and would no longer be laymen. These suggestions are all possible alternatives and could be implemented. However, it has to be said that if an alternative to the jury system were to be introduced, it would have been already. The jury system has served society well over the past 800 years. The public have confidence in the system and accept that it is the best way to decide indictable only offences. Any alternative that could be introduced would be done under mass political pressure and would be widely opposed. Despite some flaws in the system, there is no alternative that is as advantageous with fewer disadvantages. Unless a revolutionary new idea is fathomed at some point in the future, the jury system will continue to so serve the public well. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Written By: George Mundell - Jones 11UMA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    There are several reasons for this, one of which is that potential jurors are chosen from those people that are currently on the electoral roll. This automatically excludes a significant proportion of the population that would otherwise be eligible. Auld said on eligibility.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Smith got into an argument and killed someone. Raised 3 defences: - 1. Provocation 2. Diminished responsibility 3. Self defence He was convicted of murder and appealed to the COA and then HOL who said, "His clinical depression which may have reduced his level of control should have been put to the jury" Cumulative provocation - Battered wife

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    These proposals have not yet been put into effect. At the start of the trial, a jury is empanelled and sworn. The prosecution or defence can object to a particular juror for good cause, but there is no voir dire and no peremptory challenge.

  2. Law in association with the criminalisation of certain drugs.

    Either of these alternatives would treat drug use as a health and social rather than a law enforcement concern. This would enable Australia to more effectively reduce the negative effects of drug use and progress towards a healthier society. Reference List - Alternative Systems of Cannabis Control in New Zealand: A Discussion Paper.

  1. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    This is essential to keep a good team spirit and allow things to run smoothly. Following orders: An essential factor of discipline is following orders. Not following orders leads to the undermining that persons authority. People who are in authority are there because they have proven that they deserve to be through their hard work to get and expertise.

  2. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    Even in these cases the judge may refuse a jury if the trial will involve a lot of scientific material, which may be distressing for a jury to look at, or there might be complex evidence where the judge feels it would be hard for the jury to understand everything that is said.


    Such a burden could have taken funding from other, more necessary, areas. In this way, tort law operates for the good of the individual and the greater community. Such a two-fold operation provides society with an efficient tool for development.

  2. Law : Juries & Judges

    * Anytime during the last 10 years had a community order or other community sentence passed on them. Also, if you are currently on bail in criminal proceedings you do not qualify. In addition to this list if you are suffering from a serious mental illness or mental handicap you cannot sit as a juror.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work