• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Justice

Extracts from this document...


Law and Justice The law is a set of standardised procedures and mechanisms used in the enforcement of basic rights and the regulation of society. Sir John Salmond defined law 'the principles used in the administration of justice' Justice is more difficult to define than law. Basically, it can be viewed as 'the principle of fairness', but this then leads to a discussion of what 'fairness' means. This has led to many differing definitions of justice being put forward. There are two main ideas of justice - procedural and substantive. Procedural justice views something as just if the correct procedures are followed, even if the procedures are not fair to begin with. Supporters of procedural justice say that for there to be justice it is important that everyone is treated in the same way and has the same rights. However, it is sometimes the case that it is not 'fair' for everyone to have the same rights. For example, the right to represent yourself is an important right, but is it appropriate in rape cases for the defendant to be able to cross-examine his alleged victim? ...read more.


An unjust law might be contrary to human good or against the higher law derived from God. A law which went against this God-derived law would always be 'unjust' and should not be obeyed. The Human Rights Act would suggest that there is a close connection between the law and the natural law theorists' concepts of justice, because it incorporates into English law and the European Convention on Human Rights which sets out 'fundamental' rights, such as freedom of expression and freedom from torture. Natural law theorists would support the decision in Dianne Pretty's case because it upholds the sanctity of human life. An alternative theory is that of utilitarianism, argued by Jeremy Bentham, which measures the justice of a law on the basis of its consequences - if it benefits the majority, then it is just. This means that a law may create social inequalities, and benefit some of the expense of others, but if the gain to the majority exceeds the loss to the minority, then it is just. Professor Rawls, in a view known as 'the original position', developed the idea of a just society being one which a group of rational but mutually disinterested people would unanimously choose to belong to if such a choice were available. ...read more.


However, it would arguably not be just to allow this defence for all offences as this would mean that people who committed acts of violence when drunk would be perceived to be getting away with something for which a sober person would be convicted. There is also the issue of whether the victim would feel that justice had been done. One solution might be to deal with each case on its own merits and leave it to the common sense of the jury. But this in turn might raise the issue that defendants are not being treated equally, which would be against procedural justice. In conclusion, it is clear that although some laws do not appear to be connected with ideas of justice, e.g. which side of the road we drive on, the law in general is closely connected with justice. Laws may become unenforceable if they go against prevailing views I what is just and it must be a fundamental principle of a democratic society that laws are based on ideas of justice. At the same time it is clear that what may seem just to utilitarians might not appear just to supporters of natural law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    identifying her father, mother, and son, and recounting details of Constance's early years with her parents.

  2. Smoking Ban

    Like he writes in line 50: "If the people of Rotherdam wish to smoke themselves to death, what business is it of the people in London?". 2nd question: Simon Jenkins is using exaggeration and irony much in his article. It gives a feeling that he is "down on the ground" and talking to everybody.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    But a holder or endorser, who wants to give notice to all parties, cannot claim as many days as there are endorsers. He must give notice to all whom he wants to hold liable within the time in which he is to give notice to his immediate endorser.

  2. Effectiveness of the law in gaining justice for society.

    Within some areas of the legal system legislation is amended at a rather fast pace in response to community outrage. For example, the case of R v Bilal Skaf was interrupted by the State Government following outbursts of anger arousing within the community.

  1. prisoners rights

    That Act has provision of varying conditions of probation and has also set down the procedure to be followed in case of the offenders failing to observe conditions. Overcrowding is reduced by releases on parole as well, which is

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    In essence they have been trying to define the goal posts. How far can we interpret the freedom of expression, before it infringes privacy? Elwood14 argues that celebrities may be seen to have waived their right to privacy; thus he claims the defence to any privacy actions they bring is implied consent.

  1. Essay on Justice

    Thomas Aquinas. This theory of Natural Law can be contrasted with Positivism. Natural lawyers conflict with positivist thinkers who believe that if the Law is made according to correct procedure, then it should be followed however much it conflicts with morality. Positivists like Kelsen argue that Law and morality are entirely separate

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Even in its American infancy, patent law has always been important, important enough to be revised three years after its inception. To quote the Patent and Trademark Office website, "A U.S. patent for an invention is the grant of a property right to the inventor(s), issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work