• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and order in the American west.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law and order in the American west 1. What can you learn from this source about the Mormon settlement at Salt Lake City? * From source A, I have leant a lot about how Mormons settled in the Salt Lake City. I can see in the picture that they planned out to build houses, schools, shops and farms in a good structure, instead of building them any where. The roads were well built and made equally between each street as you can see from the picture. There are a few great big building at the front of the picture which suggests that they were organised. Industrial factory which probably manufactured the raw materials like metal and wood for the housing, there are also other big building that looks like schools and shops, this tell us that the children were not just wandering around the street causing complete chaos or mischief but were educated by going to school and the adults were employed in factories or shops. The farming land shows that they were total self-suffient and made their own food. Overall the engraving of the Salt Lake City looks peaceful and non violent town. 2. Use this source and your own knowledge to explain why there were difficulties such as those described here in living in early mining towns. * From source B, I have leant that there were a lot of difficulties living in early mining towns. It tells us people were robbed and guns were in existence and this caused a problem because everyone carried 'a trusty riffle, protect his own'. ...read more.

Middle

Source E suggests that there no official law enforcement in early western towns, as normal citizens took the law into their own hand and formed vigilante committees. It is apparent that the problems most have been serious, as hanging without a trial was used a deterrent. This source is both useful as it was actually written by the vigilantes and explains what they did. The source is not useful because it does not describe problems which caused vigilantes to act in this way. Source F back ups the question that there were problems with law and order in early western towns, as there a lot of crime because all the jails were full and a police force was set up. The source is useful for telling us that settlers were organized against crime and the source also shows an organised system of law enforcement. but is not useful because it written by a journalist which may have exaggerated and a biased view. He may have probably done this to make the story bigger. 5. Use source B and D your own knowledge to explain the statement in source E * Source E tells us about vigilante and how they took the law into their own hands, and source B and D help to explain the reason behind the vigilantes. From source B it is obvious that they were criminals and crimes were committed, so law enforcement was needed. There was no safety for life or properties suppose that there was no official law Enforcement such police or sheriff. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Source b shows the value and attitudes of early settlers, including the primitive code of honour, which meant that it was "your responsibility to settle things or your self", supporting the quote, "life and property might have been safe", and from source g .guns were easily accessible and extremely common. * These issues compared together. Were destined to result in violence. This attitude and the consequence were very selfish of the earlysettlers, as they were not prepared to collaborate as team. Another supporting issue of the statement I source g is the effect of racism in early western towns. Mobs of miners were more interested in driving Mexicans from their claims, harassing the Chinese and slaughtering Indians instead of putting effort in to combating crime. * Source e demonstrates that the early settlers went too far in attempting to deal with transgressions. They acted irresponsible by forming vigilant groups and performing appalling acts of murder and punishments, which they said was in the name of justice. "Lynch law" used, where the suspected criminals would b convicted and punished by groups, without a legal trial they were often murdered and hung from trees, as in source e , without substantial evidence ,trial or right to appeal. Arguably, the vigilantes made law and order worse in early western towns, as they committed crimes themselves. A governor of Idaho (source g) recommended that instead of dealing with criminals themselves, they should have invested in "public affairs" and elected honest men who would deal with villains, into power. Other sources oppose the comment in source g, and imply that other, more important factors ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    (Back to the twelfth century?) There have been problems with jury nobbling. That is pressurising one or more members of a jury by the use of threats into attempting to influence the outcome of the trial. This problem has been so serious, that in some cases special measures had to be taken to protect the jury from outside interference.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Recklessness as MR for s18 The statute clearly stated that s18 should be a crime if intention, however, in the case of Cunningham 1957 the word malicious was interpreted to mean, intention; direct or oblique or subjective recklessness. This potentially meant that s18 could be interpreted as a reckless offence from 1957 onwards.

  1. Should guns be banned in America?

    shot dead in a robbery stepped in front of her killers to save her daughter, said her husband."

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    When put into this light, one can see how living things, and natural things can morally not be patented. Also, who owns patents? If one works for a certain company and creates a product usually the patent goes to the company rather that the inventor itself.

  1. To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

    These statutory provisions, however, provide a significant flaw in the registered system because compensation is not available to every individual who suffers a loss. Under r13 of the Land Registration Rules (1925), minor slips to not require formal rectification. The cases where the register may be rectified are provided by s82.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    But a holder or endorser, who wants to give notice to all parties, cannot claim as many days as there are endorsers. He must give notice to all whom he wants to hold liable within the time in which he is to give notice to his immediate endorser.

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    Eventually, the other clauses became outmoded and some were repealed. Nonetheless, the Magna Carta remains a major document in the history of individual liberty. The document establishes the principle that no person, not even the king, is above the law.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    internal corruption of the natural body of the community; and the communal body must act to rid itself of this deadly venom. As I shall next trace, the narrative movement of the Man of Law's Tale enacts a similarly oscillating paradigm of medieval orientalism, for it tropes Islam's "sweetness"-- its

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work