• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law- Strict liability, mens rea actus reus

Extracts from this document...


Explain the concept of "actus reus" and "mens rea" and strict liability. Do you think that there should be strict liability for a crime where there was no prior intention to commit the offence? "A crime is an unlawful act or default which is an offence against the public and renders the person guilty of the act or default liable to legal punishment." 1 In relation to the question... The essay will be divided into two sections. The first section of the essay will explain the principles of actus reus, mens rea and strict liability. The second section of this essay will discuss the opinions and criticisms of the law relating to strict liability. In addition, a conclusion on the arguments as to whether strict liability is fair will be reached and suggestion son reform will be made. *elements of a crime. A- To find a person guilty of a crime, two elements must be present; actus reus and mens rea. The legal dictionary definition of actus reus is a 'guilty act' which is forbidden by the criminal law. ...read more.


The victim takes avoiding action- for example victim jumping into a river to escape an attack and drowns - defendant can be responsible for the death. Defendant is not guilty is the action taken by the victim was unreasonable or too far removed from original attack for example, three months after an assault the victim suffers from depression and as a result commits suicide. In the case of R. v. Smith (1959) a soldier got stabbed when a fight broke out in his barracks. The Court of Appeal described his medical treatment as "thoroughly bad". The Court of Appeal held that the victim's death was still a result of being stabbed by the defendant so he or she was of murder. C- Mens rea literally means guilty mind however the defendant does not need to know what he is doing is a crime. The defendant only used to have the intention required by that specific offence that they are charged with. There are different types of intention. The law states that a defendant must have specific intention for serious crimes. ...read more.


When the courts are deciding whether or not an offence is strict liability, they have to take into consideration certain factors. These factors are based on a modern criteria and were created by Lord Scarman in the case of Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Attorney General for Hong Kong (1984) 2. In the following examples he states he is basically describing various situations where strict liability would apply: 1. There is a presumption of law that mens rea is required before a person can be held guilty of a criminal offence. 2. Mens rea is particularly required where the offence is truly criminal - very serious. 3. Mens rea can only be removed where a statue clearly states that mens rea is not necessary. 4. The only situation where mens rea can be removed is where the statute is concerned with an issue of social concern and public safety. 5. Strict liability is preferred in situations where the aim is to prevent people committing a certain crime 1 Halsbury's Laws of England quoted by Lord Tucker. Case before the House of Lords, Board of Trade v. Owen (1957) 2 Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Attorney General for Hong Kong (1984) 2 ALL ER 503 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    becomes a stronger defence because of the affects of alcohol or drugs" The role of alcoholism Although alcohol doesn't add to diminished responsibility, it is possible that excessive alcohol abuse can cause diminished responsibility. In the case of TANDY (1988)

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    Nevertheless Indian judiciary too has used reasonable man in a few cases. G.B.MAHAJAN v JALGAON MUNCIPAL COUNCIL21 Though this does not happen to be case of tort, the issue of reasonable man in the case of tort law had been elaborately explained while the judiciary made an attempt to distinguish

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    1271), which encourages Muslims to think that "they themselves were in a fair way to becoming Christians." A later work expressing the same viewpoint but addressed to a Christian audience is Mandeville's Travels. It opens its discussion of the Saracens with an enumeration of the beliefs and doctrines shared by

  2. Discuss either in the relation to the actus reus or the mens rea of ...

    Property belonging to a person in civil law will be treated as belonging to them even in the event of theft as section 5 states: 'Property shall b regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it or having it in any proprietary right or interest' The

  1. Is the imposition of strict liability ever justifiable in criminal law?

    (Elliot and Quinn, p.36) Since they had taken all reasonable and practical precautions, it would appear that this ruling is fairly severe. There does appear, however, to be a strong argument for its use in order to protect the consumer, and perhaps more specifically, the public.

  2. Mens rea

    Oblique Intent is where the defendant has one purpose in mind but in achieving that purpose also causes other consequences as in Hancock and Shankland 1986. Recklessness is the taking of an unjustifiable risk. There are two levels of recklessness, Subjective where the defendant realises the risk but decides to

  1. Vicariouis liability and article 21

    so basically we can say that it is a merging of constitutional law with law of torts .In order with far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court of India has extended the scope of article 21 of the Indian Constitution (protection of life and personal liberty )

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    In addition, where an instrument is originally 'payable to order,' it may become 'payable to bearer' if endorsed in blank by the payee. Section 31 of the Reserve Bank of India Act: It is important to note that the above definition is subject to the provisions of Section 31 of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work