• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Law
  • Word count: 2314

Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms. By Lucy Weet There has been much discussion on the Offences against the person act (OAPA) 1861. Many see the act as outdated and clumsy, its wording unclear and as being difficult to explain and prosecute under. The OAPA is used in 100,000 prosecutions every year. The Law Commission has attacked the OAPA for creating constant legal argument and delay because of unclear wording and wasting thousands of pounds in taxpayer's money in appeals. Both the Law Commission and the Government have looked at possible reforms for the act in order to improve its position in English Law. The 1861 Act is widely criticised for being archaic and unclear, it is in urgent need of reform. It is hoped that after the change have been made that the statute will be able to be used more effectively and efficiently. The criticisms of the OAPA have been around for several years. Many lawyers and judges have expressed difficulties in using the act and there have been Law Commissions set up to look into the act itself. Jack Straw has described the act as "out-moded and unclear Victorian legislation"1 The wording used in the act is now frequently used in everyday language which has led to differences in meaning and problems in interpreting the statute. ...read more.

Middle

A spouse can now be compelled to give evidence against a partner in court, however no one can be forced to give evidence. Orders can be made prohibiting violence against a partner and orders can also be passed which remove the violent partner from the home, although it is hard to enforce these if the partner really wants to get at the victim. The Law Commission considered reforming the OAPA at the beginning of the 1990s, producing a report in 1993. In 1998 the Home Office produced a consultation document to show its commitment to modernising and improving the law. In contrast to the Law Commission's plans to abolish the OAPA and replace it with a Criminal Justice Act the government are simply planning to reform it with an act. The Government doesn't intend to make the law any tougher or more lenient, just to make it clearer and easier to use. The draft Bill updates the language and avoids words which could be unclear. The Criminal Law Revision Committee had suggested getting rid of the distinctions between wounding and "bodily harm" and introduce "causing injury". They also suggested a distinction between serious injury and injury, and that serious injury with intent should be more serious than serious injury caused by recklessness. ...read more.

Conclusion

The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment. Clause 14 provides definitions of terms such as intent and recklessness. The definition of recklessness requires a subjective test to be applied in establishing mens rea and reflects the case of Savage and Parmenter 1992. These new definitions make it clear that to be reckless, the defendant must take a risk knowing or believing that circumstances could lead to the result. The bill also defines "injury" as physical or mental injury, but leaves serious injury open to interpretation. However "anything caused by disease" is not an injury except in Clause 1. In conclusion, it can clearly be seen that the law on the Offence Against the Person Act 1861 is outdated and unclear, creating unnecessary confusion in the courts. The Consultation Paper of 1998 shows the way in which the Government intends to modernise and simplify the law in this area. In particular, it provides a new hierarchy of offences to replace the existing range of statutory and common-law offences. By making the law more accessible in this way, it will smooth the passage of thousands of cases a year, allowing citizen to understand the criminal offences more easily and enabling the police to explain and charge offences which are more widely understood. It is also hoped that the task of judges, magistrates and juries will become more straightforward in the administration of justice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Automatism is generally considered to be a state in which a person has no ...

    5 star(s)

    In this case the defendant was suffering from a condition that caused hardening of the arteries, causing him to go into a state of automatism and attack his wife with a hammer. Although the defence attempted to follow Charlson, as the defendant was in a state of unconsciousness.

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    Was a question that arose. However different context in which the operation of "reasonableness" as test of validity must be kept distinguished. For instance as the arguments in the present case invoke, the administrative law test of 'reasonableness' is different from the test of the 'reasonable man' familiar to the

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    M won (obviously) Intention? No Foreseen death or GBH? No but convicted of murder Appealed COA � HOL and decided to change the Hyam direction to the Maloney test (two tier test) (Lord Bridge) 1. Was death or GBH a NATURAL CONSEQUENCE of the defendants actions and did the defendant see that one or other of the consequences would follow this act?

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    The supervisory role of the European Court of Justice, Article 234 of the Treaty of Rome provides that any court or tribunal in a member state may refer a question on EU law to the European Court of Justice, if it considers that 'a decision on that question is necessary to enable it to give judgement'.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    due notice of dishonor to all prior parties, the holder may in a suit against the drawer take advantage of notice given by that party and treat it as a notice by himself. The agent of any of the above parties may give notice.

  2. Critically evaluate the changes which have been made since 1990 to the definition of ...

    this; the 1956 Act did not recognise anal rape so in law male rape did not exist. This was articulated in the case of Gaston12 where the judge clearly stated that the actus reus of rape related only to vaginal intercourse and anal rape was not to be considered as rape in any circumstance.

  1. The Inchoate (Incomplete) Offences - Essay Notes

    The fact that the company's advertisement did point out that o do so would be an offence did not prevent liability being incurred. - R v GOLDMAN (2001) - D had seen an advertisement in a magazine for the sale of pornographic videos of children.

  2. Contact orders

    must merely take into account and weigh their professional opinions and judgement as was held in F v West Berks AHA5 Family Law Act 1996 - Part 4 - Domestic violence??? Human Rights and Future With regards to the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998, it was thought that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work