• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problem dealt here is between the 2 parties, who have been in possession of a property, one whom is legally entitled to it, ot

Extracts from this document...


SADIA SAMED Year 2 STUDENT ID: M217806 'INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF PROPERTY' UNIT CODE LL2015 A person who dies without having made a will is said to have died intestate. The rules governing the devolution of his property are to be found in the Administration of Estate Act 1925, the main situation that will arise for this case is the situation where the deceased leaves behind children, and the property is divided amongst them. Problem here is between the 2 parties, who have been in possession of a property, both of whom are legally entitled to it, with reference to the above, but only one is claiming beneficial interest. No problem would have occurred if both parties were present at the acquisition of the property, but only one was present during the acquisition. This problem lies in establishing the extent of those beneficial interests in the absence of any declaration. In the Law of Property Act 1925 S60 (3) in voluntary conveyance a resulting trust for the grantors shall not be implied merely by reason that the property is not expressed to be conveyed for the used or benefit of the grantee. ...read more.


However, there might not be evidence to support finding of an oral agreement to share the house, then the court will rely on the conduct of the parties which shows Debra acted to her detriment in reliance on the verbal agreement that Debra would have interest in the property according to the above elements as held in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset5. The difficulties are that express declaration of trust is enforceable only if evidence is signed in writing in accordance to s. 53 (1) (b) of the Law of Property Act 1925. The court may still give effect to the agreement as to beneficial ownership, notwithstanding the absence of statutory formalities (Gissing v Gissing)6 As a result Debra may still be entitled to beneficial rights of the property as she suffers from a detriment in reliance on that agreement and it is equitable fraud for Stan to have any title in the face of that agreement. Three substantial elements needs to be demonstrated to success in her claim under proprietary estoppel (i) an assurance, (ii) change of position, (iii) detriment. For this reason Debra assured her position has changed by not going to Dubai for a new career and she relied on Fred's words. ...read more.


Stan may expect to have some interest in the property but according to the above, this has to be at the time of the acquisition of the house. Nonetheless, Stan cannot claim behind of resulting trust under the above principles. Conclusion From the above cases, it has been found that in order to establish resulting trust the claimant has to provide some direct contribution towards the acquisition of the property and at the time of acquiring the house. However, under constructive trust, the claimant does not have to provide any purchase money at the time of acquisition of the property as long the claimant provide some indirect contribution such as substantial improvement towards the house and installment payment of the mortgage and also if there is some common intention that the claimant has relied on her detriments. The proprietary estoppel will arise in situation where there are some informal agreements and the claimant has been assured, reliance, and unconscionable disadvantage to have successful claim. However, the remedy or interest that claimant will claim for property is depending on contribution money which claimant had provided. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law of Evidence - R v Kearley

    5 star(s)

    Assuming that the evidence was hearsay it is submitted that they should be admissible as the dangers associated with implied assertions are not as great as they are for express assertions. Firstly, according to Dennis26 insincerity will rarely be in issue, as 'it would be a very elaborate kind of

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    dissension amongst the courts to what exactly a resulting trust is and when it occurs. Its main reasoning to being in existence is to prevent unfair enrichment and to support the maxim that 'equity abhors a beneficial vacuum.'6 Whenever someone buys either real or personal property and has it conveyed

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Voluntary - Applies to certain types of crime (Specific intent) Outcome is variable, lesser offence - sometimes an acquittal Both types assume no MR. in effect blackout stage. No knowledge of what has been done Involuntary intoxication R v Kingston (1993)

  2. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    A trust may be declared inter vivos7 without the need to satisfy any formal requirements. With regards to declaring a trust over a legal interest in land, s. 53 of the Law of Property Act requires that any interest in land must be proved by a document signed by the settlor, or proved by the testators will.

  1. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    The case law in this section over the years has defined what is charitable. Trusts to assist poor emigrants6 is valid, homes for decayed or distressed gentlefolk7 and hostels for working men or young girls8 are also seen to be of charitable purpose.


    government.17 A suggested reform, and one that will be discussed further, was that of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The benefits of ADR is that it "allows parties greater control over resolving the issues between them, encourages problem-solving approaches, and provides for more effective settlements covering substance and nuance."18 This approach

  1. 'Gillett v. Holt is a watershed in the law of estoppel. The need to

    An early case that gave it credibility as a legal option was Inwards v. Baker3 in which a son who had constructed a bungalow on his father's land upon his request and lived in it with his family for over 30 years was granted a licence by estoppel to remain

  2. Common Law and Equity

    all legal aspects of today's population it is for this reason that equity was introduced, equity now helps the justice system work more efficiently Nowadays equity is used in many situations, but is mainly used in mortgage and trust problems.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work