• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Public - Housing Evictions Law.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Public-Housing Evictions Law There are many low-income families living in United States today. Most of them cannot afford a decent place to live. Therefore, the government has made many public housing programs to assist low-income families to pay the rent so they can afford to pay for the house. The housing programs will pay three-fourths of the rent and the tenants will pay the other one-fourth of the rent. Sometimes the government will use the income of the tenants to see how much the government should pay. Nevertheless, some tenants have misused this privilege, and caused the government to lose a tremendous amount of money. Some did not appreciate this opportunity and used "their houses" as a drug-place. Recently, congress realizes these types of behaviors are not right and passed several laws to band such action. One of the laws is the Drug Eviction Law. This law suggests that families can be removed for the drug use of one member, whether the drug activity is in the home or somewhere else. Hence, this law is unfair and needed to be correct. On March 25,2002 the Supreme Court ruled that public housing tenants may be evicted if any member of his or her household is caught using illegal drugs, even if the tenants is unaware of the drug use. ...read more.

Middle

The poor people who have no other housing options should not be held strictly accountable for the conduct of their relatives or guests (Public-Housing Eviction Over Drugs Upheld). Willie Lee, 71, who has lived in public housing for more than 25 years, and get evicted because her grandson was caught smoking marijuana in the apartment complex parking lot. Barbara Hill, 63, who has lived in public housing for more than 30 years, also gets evicted because her grandson admitted smoking in the parking lot. The majorities who are eligible for this program are senior citizens and low-income families. They are the population who needs help from other. Is it fair for them to take the consequences for others? Last year, one of my cousins who lived under Section 8 housing, got caught using drugs in front of his school. It was the first time that he uses drugs and he was only fourteen. For that reason, the government evicted his whole family out of the apartment that they lived in. Right now they have to live in my uncle's house because they haven't found any house to rent yet. I currently live with my parents under government housing sections 8. If I get caught with drugs, where will my parents live if they get evicted? ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in this author opinion, as of a recent lawsuit, tenants should not be evicted for the criminal acts of others unless he/she knows of the criminal activity and fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent it (Public Housing Evictions). For example, if the drug user gets evicted for some kind of drug violation. They can continue with their drug activities at another cities, towns or countries. Therefore, who ever are doing the drugs should be responsible for their actions. The drug activities will not end if we punish their family members; therefore, the penalty must hold on them, not their family members. The new public housing law states that landlords have the legal right to evict tenants whose guest or household members use illegal drug without the tenant's knowledge. However, it is not equitable to evict a family if one's convicted a drug activity. The innocent tenants who live in the public housing don't deserve this kind of penalty when they are not the ones who violated the law. Imagine a whole family of six getting kicked out because of one child's act. The government should come up with some other solution besides dropping the whole family off the program. This will not reduce the number of homeless, poverty, and crime. Therefore, this eviction law should not be enforced; the government should punish the members who are causing the problem instead of the family as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    I would give you a running through' - Common assault charge failed because it was clear that he wasn't going to do it. S47 ABH OAPA 1961 Level of harm necessary for s47 R v Miller 1954 - 'ABH includes hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort.'

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    While dealing with this he wrote in his judgement that "To determine whether an act would be or would not be negligent, it is relevant to determine if any reasonable man would foresee that the act would cause damage or not."

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    Many feel the contrary, however, it has been proven that execution is actually more expensive than life imprisonment, and hence, by executing human beings, additional money that could be used in other forms is being spent. The majority thinks that capital punishment is cruel, and hence should never be applied to human beings.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    its joyous conclusion of reuniting Custance with her western family, her Saxon husband, Aella, and her Roman father, and to end on a note of dynastic succession in the observation that Custance and Aella's son, Maurice, became a model Christian emperor.

  1. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    The second scene based on the school shooting at Columbine High School marks a change in tone as the documentary takes a more serious tone. Much of Moore's ability to persuade hinges on the emotional impact of seeing two cold-blooded teenage boys gunning down other children with automatic weapons and

  2. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    Whether a trust has adequate educational value is in the final analysis a question of degree for the courts.

  1. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    The Committee on the Rights of the Child has said that 10 is too young for criminal responsibility. If our aim is rehabilitation, it is best done under the civil system, not the criminal justice system. Verdict: Yes, to 14 Lyn Costello Mothers Against Murder and Aggression Children of 10 know the difference between right and wrong.

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    In January 2004 an internal criminal investigation by the United States Army began. Leading on from this investigation on April of the following year reports of the abuse, as well as graphic pictures showing American military personnel in the act of abusing prisoners. This resulted in an incredible political scandal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work