• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Public - Housing Evictions Law.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Public-Housing Evictions Law There are many low-income families living in United States today. Most of them cannot afford a decent place to live. Therefore, the government has made many public housing programs to assist low-income families to pay the rent so they can afford to pay for the house. The housing programs will pay three-fourths of the rent and the tenants will pay the other one-fourth of the rent. Sometimes the government will use the income of the tenants to see how much the government should pay. Nevertheless, some tenants have misused this privilege, and caused the government to lose a tremendous amount of money. Some did not appreciate this opportunity and used "their houses" as a drug-place. Recently, congress realizes these types of behaviors are not right and passed several laws to band such action. One of the laws is the Drug Eviction Law. This law suggests that families can be removed for the drug use of one member, whether the drug activity is in the home or somewhere else. Hence, this law is unfair and needed to be correct. On March 25,2002 the Supreme Court ruled that public housing tenants may be evicted if any member of his or her household is caught using illegal drugs, even if the tenants is unaware of the drug use. ...read more.

Middle

The poor people who have no other housing options should not be held strictly accountable for the conduct of their relatives or guests (Public-Housing Eviction Over Drugs Upheld). Willie Lee, 71, who has lived in public housing for more than 25 years, and get evicted because her grandson was caught smoking marijuana in the apartment complex parking lot. Barbara Hill, 63, who has lived in public housing for more than 30 years, also gets evicted because her grandson admitted smoking in the parking lot. The majorities who are eligible for this program are senior citizens and low-income families. They are the population who needs help from other. Is it fair for them to take the consequences for others? Last year, one of my cousins who lived under Section 8 housing, got caught using drugs in front of his school. It was the first time that he uses drugs and he was only fourteen. For that reason, the government evicted his whole family out of the apartment that they lived in. Right now they have to live in my uncle's house because they haven't found any house to rent yet. I currently live with my parents under government housing sections 8. If I get caught with drugs, where will my parents live if they get evicted? ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in this author opinion, as of a recent lawsuit, tenants should not be evicted for the criminal acts of others unless he/she knows of the criminal activity and fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent it (Public Housing Evictions). For example, if the drug user gets evicted for some kind of drug violation. They can continue with their drug activities at another cities, towns or countries. Therefore, who ever are doing the drugs should be responsible for their actions. The drug activities will not end if we punish their family members; therefore, the penalty must hold on them, not their family members. The new public housing law states that landlords have the legal right to evict tenants whose guest or household members use illegal drug without the tenant's knowledge. However, it is not equitable to evict a family if one's convicted a drug activity. The innocent tenants who live in the public housing don't deserve this kind of penalty when they are not the ones who violated the law. Imagine a whole family of six getting kicked out because of one child's act. The government should come up with some other solution besides dropping the whole family off the program. This will not reduce the number of homeless, poverty, and crime. Therefore, this eviction law should not be enforced; the government should punish the members who are causing the problem instead of the family as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Lamb 1967 no MR therefore no prosecution 2. Unlawful = Criminal Oldest case Franklin. More recent Cato 1976 and Dalby 1982. the most recent Kennedy 1998 3. Dangerous criminal act Church 1966, the judge directed jury to apply an objective test as to what was dangerous.

  2. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    This enables the court to hold purposes to be charitable which cannot be directly connected to one of the original purposes listed in the preamble. Sachs LJ described this wider test in the Council of Law Reporting case as having "an admirable breadth and flexibility which enables it to be reasonably applied from generation to generation to meet changing circumstances".

  1. Law in association with the criminalisation of certain drugs.

    Our predecessors failed to adequately assess the impact of such laws, and whether it was necessary to prohibit illicit substances although there was no definite 'drug problem.' Despite this, current politicians consider the criminalisation of illicit substances crucial and emphasises the necessity of being 'tough on drugs.'

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Videotaping and photographing naked male and female detainees. ? Forcibly arranging detainees in various sexually explicit positions for photographing. ? Forcing detainees to remove their clothing and keeping them naked for several days at a time. ? Forcing naked male detainees to wear women's underwear.

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Robert Burchinal. Mr. Burchinal was attempting to patent an apple tree found in the early 1990's in the Wenatchee region of Washington, which he cleverly dubbed "Burchinal Red Delicious." Somewhere within the process of the patent forms Microsoft's and Burchinal's names got mixed up and Microsoft was the proud new patentee of a lovely breed of apple tree.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    had to learn how to treat others to fit back into society. Verdict: Yes, to 15 I believe The Guardians special report is a good source of credible information. What we have here are the views given by a variety of different people on the idea of what the correct age of criminal responsibility should be.

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    Although some feel that capital punishment would reduce crime rates, there are others who feel conversely. They believe that capital punishment has not been seen to be effective since some statistics have shown that the murder rates have appeared to increase rather than to decrease.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    notice of dishonor, notice of protest must be given by the notary public. When noting is equivalent to Protest (Sec. 104A): When a bill or note is required to be protested within a certain time or proceeding, it is sufficient if the bill or note is noted within that time or proceeding; the formal protest may be issued later.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work