• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Public Law 1 - Assessed Coursework 2004 Over the years the UK constitution has come underscrutiny regarding the doctrine of the separation of powers. This doctrine isseen as being vital for any constitution to run smoothly with no problems. Inorder...

Extracts from this document...


Public Law 1 - Assessed Coursework 2004 Over the years the UK constitution has come under scrutiny regarding the doctrine of the separation of powers. This doctrine is seen as being vital for any constitution to run smoothly with no problems. In order to examine the statement made by Lord Simon I will first look at the definition of Separation of Powers as well as how it relates to the three primary organs of the UK constitution. I shall then go on to look at breaches of the fundamental doctrine and whether the view of Lord Simon can be viewed as being accurate or not. The doctrine of the separation of powers was first put forward by a French political theorist named Charles de Montesquieu in 1748. In his book, 'the spirit of the law' he stated that the liberty of the individual is secure only if the three primary organs of the state; the executive, legislature and the judiciary are distinct and independent in both duty and in persons. This ensures that no one body accumulates excessive and uneven balance of power, which is in violation of the doctrine. Montesquieu also believes that the doctrine would produce institutions that are relatively independent from one another and supports a system of checks and balances. Thus it is fair to acknowledge that the doctrine prescribes the appropriate allocation of powers and the limits of those powers. ...read more.


According to the doctrine, as well as the functions of the three branches being distinct from one another so should the personnel. Nevertheless, in the UK, there is a clear link between the three bodies within the system of government. This can be seen by members of the executive that sit within the legislature as do some members of the judiciary. However the most noticeable breach of the doctrine of the separation of powers is the position of the Lord Chancellor who sits in all three branches. His position in relation to the doctrine within the constitution will be discussed later. One reason why it has been held that the UK constitution is in breach of the doctrine is to do with the fact that the UK, unlike other countries such as America and France never underwent a lasting revolution. This therefore means that there has not been a need to establish a new constitution and so the separation of powers has not been incorporated specifically into the constitution. After a revolution is over, a written document is regularly produced in order to clarify and certify certain rules that govern bodies within the State, including that of the separation of powers. However in the UK, the separation of powers has not been clearly set up in the form of a written document, which increases the possibility of excessive power and therefore tyranny. ...read more.


Furthermore the courts still cannot declare an Act of Parliament as unconstitutional as seen in Pickin v British Railway Board8. This supports the theory of separation of powers, as the judiciary cannot trespass into territory of the legislature. The judiciary appear to be very keen that each primary body work within its own allocation of power and will say when a member of the executive has exceeded their allocated powers and will also refuse jurisdiction when lawful authority is not being used. In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Fire Brigades Union9 the House of Lords held that the home secretary had acted unlawfully in the way they had used the prerogative. On the other hand, in Chandler v DPP10 the court refused to hear the case on the grounds that the evaluation of threats to national security is not for the judiciary but for the government. In conclusion to this essay, I feel that both sides of the argument have been looked at and it is fair to say that the UK constitution does not include an absolute separation of powers however the doctrine also does impose limits on the exercise of governmental power. In my opinion, I feel that the doctrine of separation of powers does exist to some extent within the UK constitution however I also believe that from Montesquieu's perception, the doctrine does not exist on a scale as imagined and expressed by himself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    Section 25 allows the police to arrest someone like Shane if they cannot discover his name and address, such as if he refuses to speak or runs off, or if they have reasonable grounds for believing that the name and address given by Shane is false.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    but added Ethiopia and India to them, restored Babylon, and built other new cities, Boccaccio concludes. Semiramis's pretense as a man and her usurpation of masculine privilege do not, however, finally escape Boccaccio's censure, for he ends his portrayal of her with a dire warning concerning the sexual confusion such masquerades cause in men.

  1. Metafiktion er betegnelsen for den type af sknlitteratur, film og drama, som gr opmrksom ...

    Historierne slynges ind og ud af hinanden, men l�seren kommer aldrig mere end �n historie tilbage og vi vender kun meget kort tilbage til historie I. Ellers vender vi ikke tilbage til den ukendte fort�ller. I II historien, hvor Mira Jama fort�ller om den unge teologistuderende Saufe, er der lidt

  2. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    He felt there was no need a Bill of Rights, because the general principle of the constitution is the result of judicial decisions determining the rights of the private person.5 Effectively what is being stated here is that the common law is the guardian of the rights of the individual,

  1. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick. ? Using military working dogs (without muzzles) to frighten and intimidate detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance actually biting and severely injuring a detainee.

  2. Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future?

    Advantages * Once you've built it, tidal power is free. * It produces no greenhouse gases or other waste. * It needs no fuel. * It produces electricity reliably. * Not expensive to maintain. * Tides are totally predictable. * Offshore turbines and vertical-axis turbines are not ruinously expensive to build and do not have a large environmental impact.

  1. Law Coursework

    has to pay. Nowadays people are usually summoned for jury service by computer at a Central Summoning Bureau. It is a computerised list with everyone's name being entered and there being electoral registers for each area. Once they have been selected, jury summons are sent out telling them to come out and attend the Crown Court case.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Protest The protest is the formal notary certificate attesting the dishonor of the bill, and based upon the noting which has been effected on the dishonor of the bill. After the noting has been made within the specified or reasonable time, the formal protest may be drawn up by the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work