'Salomon v Salomon is an outdated case with little relevance to modern company law' - Discuss.

This essay hasn't yet been marked by one of our teachers

You can view 8 essays on Law that have been Marked by Teachers

The first 200 words of this essay...

Company Law Essay

Duha Al-Wakeel

'Salomon v Salomon is an outdated case with little relevance to modern company law.'

Discuss.

Salomon v Salomon1 served to establish the principle of corporate personality that 'forms the cornerstone of company law.'2 It is my contention that despite various attempts by both the legislature and the judiciary to circumvent the principle, this 'cornerstone' has not been eroded, rather, it forms the very foundations of modern company law.

Salomon v Salomon was and still is a landmark case. By confirming the legitimacy of Mr Salomon's company the House of Lords put forward the concept of separate corporate personality and limited liability. Inextricably linked with this ratio is an acknowledgement of the importance of certainty within the law, thus separate corporate personality becomes a concrete principle to which the law must adhere.

Salomon v Salomon is followed in subsequent cases, notably Macaura v Northern Assurance Co.3 and Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd4. These cases highlight the reality of the separate corporate identity and take it a step further in stressing the distinction between a company's identity and that of its shareholders. In effect Salomon's principle as confirmed by Macaura v