• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should guns be banned in America?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; it is their right and duty to be at all times armed. Thomas Jefferson, 1824 Should guns be banned in America? Should guns be banned? This is one of the widest asked questions. There are those who believe that gun's should be banned, as guns are the number one killer. All around the world, small arms stocks were destroyed in the hope to lower the amount of guns in the world. South Africa's destruction of 24 000 small arms today is part of worldwide small arms destructions - 6 000 illegal guns were destroyed in Cambodia, 1 700 in Mozambique, and 10 000 weapons were destroyed in Brazil. Through these destructions governments from around the world are showing their support for the regulation of the small arms trade - a trade that kills an estimated 500 000 people each year. Handguns and other firearms have a long tradition in American civilization. The right to bear arms is an American right featured in the second Amendment of the Constitution. In the 18th century, when the constitution was written, times were different; there was a need for armed citizens to insure the safety of the society as a whole. Contemporarily the police department preserves the safety of society and the need for armed citizens is out of date. ...read more.

Middle

"Thieves killed Marion Bates, 64, in front of her daughter Xanthe in an attack at their family jewelry store in Arnold, Nottingham, on Tuesday." "A man has died and another has been injured after a drive-by shooting in Hertfordshire." "Police say two men came under fire- most possibly from an automatic weapon- outside the Physical Limit Health and Fitness Club in Brewery road in Hoddesdon Gun Control in the United States of America is a topic that has had some criticism and support by many citizens. The critical people of this topic believe that the guns do not kill people; it is the people that kill people. The supporters of this topic believe that guns lead to violence and a feeling of power over others. They also believe that if guns were eliminated from the public, then violence and death would decrease heavily in this country. These two opposing views leave the federal government open to a decision on whether or not to abolish one of our Constitutional rights, or to keep allowing people the right to own a gun. The majority of crimes committed in the United States were accompanied by a weapon, which was usually a gun. The Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research dedicates its service to prevent gun-related deaths and injuries. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gun laws have succeeded only in disarming the law abiding and making the criminals' work environment safer I submit that our concern should be to make the environment for honest citizens, and this, gun laws have failed to do." Thomas Jefferson predicted these same results when he said, "Laws that forbid the Carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one." If someone is a criminal they either don't really care about breaking the law or they don't plan on getting caught. It is absurd to pass laws that restrict law abiding citizens from owning weapons because it isn't the citizens, that are obeying the laws,that should be punished for the wrong doing of the criminals. A robber is not going to stop and think wow I better not hold up this store, with this gun, just because it is illegal. Robbing a store is illegal in the first place, but the robber is still going to rob the store, so what is the point of making guns illegal. The law shouldn't be on the gun it should be against the person using the gun. The gun itself did nothing wrong. If a robber robs a store the gun is not thinking or moving by itself so it can't be blamed for the crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    abortion research

    4 star(s)

    So long as we accept the existence of a secular sphere where religious leaders have no authority and religious doctrines cannot be the basis for law, we must also accept that civil law may be at odds with religious beliefs.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    * Medical examinations Limitations on the concept of consent The above situations of applied consent would not occur in special situations. These situations include: - 1. The age of the victim R v Burrell & Harmer (1967) - Approached by two 13 year old boys who signed consent forms for tattoos.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    FRANKLIN NAT'L BANK OF LONG ISLAND Supreme Court of New York, 1968. 57 Misc.2d 193, 291 N.Y.S.2d 429. Backgrounds and Facts: A customer ordered merchandise Sam Goody, Inc., and stated that he would secure a certified check from employer drawn directly to Sam Goody to pay the balance.

  2. Lay People

    This will be decided upon depending on if the person had a history of offences and breaking bail. The decision is usually lenient however because a person is innocent until proven guilty. Once the defendant has been granted bail he will be sent a summoning usually through the post telling him when he needs to attend court.

  1. Law and order in the American west.

    The villains will steal plots of land already claimed by miners, potentially ruining their income. The miners set up miner's courts to deal with criminals and punish them accordingly, wih a trial. for reasons such as to much violence, lying and intrigue, these mining courts could not cope with rough justice.

  2. Recognition of States and

    In a word, some attention to group needs must be embedded in justice systems else, as Hobbs put it, a war of each against all subverts and degrades the human project Lassa Openheim offers a classic formulation of constitutive theory: "A state is, and becomes an International Person through recognition only and exclusively."

  1. Citizenship Activity

    please" The children must have noticed that we did not put "Rape" up on the board as they put their hands up and asked why it wasn't on the board. Miss Burden answered that for us as we didn't know what to say.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    Elaborating upon Bloomfield's reading, Roger Ellis more recently argues that the tale offers a "sympathetic presentation of Islam" by virtue of Chaucer's "heterodox understanding" that the "experience of faith [is] remarkably similar no matter what the formal system created to contain it": The [Man of Law's] narrative hints at this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work