• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should guns be banned in America?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; it is their right and duty to be at all times armed. Thomas Jefferson, 1824 Should guns be banned in America? Should guns be banned? This is one of the widest asked questions. There are those who believe that gun's should be banned, as guns are the number one killer. All around the world, small arms stocks were destroyed in the hope to lower the amount of guns in the world. South Africa's destruction of 24 000 small arms today is part of worldwide small arms destructions - 6 000 illegal guns were destroyed in Cambodia, 1 700 in Mozambique, and 10 000 weapons were destroyed in Brazil. Through these destructions governments from around the world are showing their support for the regulation of the small arms trade - a trade that kills an estimated 500 000 people each year. Handguns and other firearms have a long tradition in American civilization. The right to bear arms is an American right featured in the second Amendment of the Constitution. In the 18th century, when the constitution was written, times were different; there was a need for armed citizens to insure the safety of the society as a whole. Contemporarily the police department preserves the safety of society and the need for armed citizens is out of date. ...read more.

Middle

"Thieves killed Marion Bates, 64, in front of her daughter Xanthe in an attack at their family jewelry store in Arnold, Nottingham, on Tuesday." "A man has died and another has been injured after a drive-by shooting in Hertfordshire." "Police say two men came under fire- most possibly from an automatic weapon- outside the Physical Limit Health and Fitness Club in Brewery road in Hoddesdon Gun Control in the United States of America is a topic that has had some criticism and support by many citizens. The critical people of this topic believe that the guns do not kill people; it is the people that kill people. The supporters of this topic believe that guns lead to violence and a feeling of power over others. They also believe that if guns were eliminated from the public, then violence and death would decrease heavily in this country. These two opposing views leave the federal government open to a decision on whether or not to abolish one of our Constitutional rights, or to keep allowing people the right to own a gun. The majority of crimes committed in the United States were accompanied by a weapon, which was usually a gun. The Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research dedicates its service to prevent gun-related deaths and injuries. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gun laws have succeeded only in disarming the law abiding and making the criminals' work environment safer I submit that our concern should be to make the environment for honest citizens, and this, gun laws have failed to do." Thomas Jefferson predicted these same results when he said, "Laws that forbid the Carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one." If someone is a criminal they either don't really care about breaking the law or they don't plan on getting caught. It is absurd to pass laws that restrict law abiding citizens from owning weapons because it isn't the citizens, that are obeying the laws,that should be punished for the wrong doing of the criminals. A robber is not going to stop and think wow I better not hold up this store, with this gun, just because it is illegal. Robbing a store is illegal in the first place, but the robber is still going to rob the store, so what is the point of making guns illegal. The law shouldn't be on the gun it should be against the person using the gun. The gun itself did nothing wrong. If a robber robs a store the gun is not thinking or moving by itself so it can't be blamed for the crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    abortion research

    4 star(s)

    Is it Ethical to Give Birth to an Unwanted Child?: While anti-choice activists like to hype supposed examples of women having abortions to keep their careers alive, it's far more common that women have abortions because they feel unable to properly care for the child.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - homosexual pedophiliac tendencies and aware that he can control reactions Set up with a young boy (K was blackmailed) got intoxicated with boy (filmed) succeeded with sexual acts on boy (15yr) Defence can be used (any defence) Defence fails as he admitted intoxication had lead to loss of self control He had MR (aware he had consciousness)

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    According to Section 127, where a check is crossed specially to more than one banker, except when that bank to whom it has been specially crossed makes another special crossing in the name of another bank for the purpose of collection, the banker on whom it is drawn shall refuse payment thereof.

  2. Lay People

    Lay Magistrates sit part time and are required to sit in court at least 26 half days a year. As Lay magistrates are not qualified they sit in bench of three magistrates. There are roughly 29,000 Lay Magistrates with nearly 1800 being appointed each year.

  1. Recognition of States and

    The characteristic of self-rule is implicit in these claims. In non-Indigenous legal and political theory, self-determination has been associated with the conventions of modern theories of sovereignty and statehood. The impact of this association is significant because states, governments and many theorists use the rhetoric of state-sovereignty to preclude recognition of Indigenous people's claims.

  2. Citizenship Activity

    We had to take into account that some things could be bought up that we really didn't want to explain about to them because of their age, e.g. "Rape". "Rape" was bought up so we tried to avoid it as much as we could by saying "Well done, and another

  1. Smoking Ban

    He is a non-smoker, but still he feel that the new law is a bit too much. Because as he writes in line 22 - 25, "smoking is unpleasant but reasonable avoidable.

  2. prisoners rights

    In the situation in which they are placed, a sympathetic approach is also required. Deficiency in communication While in jail, communication with outside world gets snapped with a result that the inmate does not know what is happening even to his near and dear ones.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work