• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this study is to outline the difficulties confronting the court when fitness to plead and insanity defence are contested.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to outline the difficulties confronting the court when fitness to plead and insanity defence are contested. The relationship between fitness to plead, insanity and crime has been of interest to man from time. This is particularly so when crimes like homicide (murder) have been committed. Prior to the trial (Pre-trial phase), fitness to plead is usually contested. ...read more.

Middle

As a result of this he had to be remanded under section 35 of the Mental Health Act 1983, for a medical report at Rampton Special Hospital. The issue here is to ascertain that the individual has got sufficient intellect to be able to plead to the indictment and also understand the proceedings sufficiently to challenge jurors, take in the evidence, and make a proper defence. ...read more.

Conclusion

Defendants who are insane and cannot stand trial are often entitled to the special verdict when they are found not guilty by reason of insanity. The most celebrated case in this regard is that of William McNaughten who in 1843, shot dead the then British Prime Minister's Secretary but was acquitted on grounds of insanity (MacRac, 1973). In this study the difficulties encountered at the pre-trial and trial phases of the court process in the context of unfitness to plead and the insanity defence will be examined. (1) R v Pritchard [1836] 7 C & P 303 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good start but more detail is required beyond Prtichard. The following detail could be included:

- the issue is raised by the prosecution and the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is unfit to plead (if the issue is raised by the defence, it need only be proved on the balance of probabilities);
- the issue is determined by a judge;
- if the jury find that the defendant is unfit to plead, the judge may make a guardianship, supervision and treatment order, or make an order for his absolute discharge.

Some criticism of the law would also attract greater marks.

Very low 3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    Court of Appeal and choose instead to follow a conflicting precedent as provided by the House of Lords should such an occasion surface. Lastly, it was decided that the judges could depart from an otherwise binding precedent on the grounds that the previous decision was made per incuriam.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    desired to enter and search; * to identify, so far as is practicable, the article or persons to be sought.

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    have pleaded guilty the evidence will still have to be gone through. After the magistrates have heard the trial they will make a decision on weather they have enough authority to sentence you, seeing they maximum penalty they can give is 6 months in prison.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    BY VICTIM R v Holland (1841) - Minor hand injury and was advised to have it amputated. Refused and became ill, had to have it amputated but too late and died. Court said Holland was the operative and substantive cause of death R v Blaue (1975)

  1. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    many crimes are immoral and harmful, but not all immoral or harmful actions are legally prohibited (lying, for example, is not illegal, except in certain circumstances, such as perjury). By definition, crime is socially determined: what constitutes crime can vary over time and between societies.

  2. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    Clauses contained a set of simple and straightforward offences to replace the offences of GBH, ABH and assault. The new offences are simply called intentional serious injury, reckless serious injury, intentional or reckless injury, and assault.

  1. 'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

    His resignation was announced on 17th November 1994 in Dail, the Houses of Representatives of the Irish Parliament. The Sunday Times published an article, headlined 'goodbye gobmen'. Mr Reynolds said that this article defamed him and made him out to of deliberately and dishonestly misled his coalition and cabinet colleagues.

  2. Consumer Protection Act 1987 This act states that the sellers are liable to any ...

    So if Tesco were found of not providing satisfactory products or overcharging then Tesco would have to pay fine or even in severe circumstance taken to court. The Sales of Goods Act 1979 and 1995 This law suggests three things.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work