• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this study is to outline the difficulties confronting the court when fitness to plead and insanity defence are contested.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to outline the difficulties confronting the court when fitness to plead and insanity defence are contested. The relationship between fitness to plead, insanity and crime has been of interest to man from time. This is particularly so when crimes like homicide (murder) have been committed. Prior to the trial (Pre-trial phase), fitness to plead is usually contested. ...read more.

Middle

As a result of this he had to be remanded under section 35 of the Mental Health Act 1983, for a medical report at Rampton Special Hospital. The issue here is to ascertain that the individual has got sufficient intellect to be able to plead to the indictment and also understand the proceedings sufficiently to challenge jurors, take in the evidence, and make a proper defence. ...read more.

Conclusion

Defendants who are insane and cannot stand trial are often entitled to the special verdict when they are found not guilty by reason of insanity. The most celebrated case in this regard is that of William McNaughten who in 1843, shot dead the then British Prime Minister's Secretary but was acquitted on grounds of insanity (MacRac, 1973). In this study the difficulties encountered at the pre-trial and trial phases of the court process in the context of unfitness to plead and the insanity defence will be examined. (1) R v Pritchard [1836] 7 C & P 303 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good start but more detail is required beyond Prtichard. The following detail could be included:

- the issue is raised by the prosecution and the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is unfit to plead (if the issue is raised by the defence, it need only be proved on the balance of probabilities);
- the issue is determined by a judge;
- if the jury find that the defendant is unfit to plead, the judge may make a guardianship, supervision and treatment order, or make an order for his absolute discharge.

Some criticism of the law would also attract greater marks.

Very low 3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Automatism is generally considered to be a state in which a person has no ...

    5 star(s)

    did not realise that failing to eat would put him into a state in which he might attack someone. However, he ought not to have an offence if he did realise this, therefore being reckless in failing to eat. In the condition of sleepwalking the law is unsettled and highly unsatisfactory, and has not been followed in other Commonwealth countries.

  2. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    have pleaded guilty the evidence will still have to be gone through. After the magistrates have heard the trial they will make a decision on weather they have enough authority to sentence you, seeing they maximum penalty they can give is 6 months in prison.

  1. Consumer Protection Act 1987 This act states that the sellers are liable to any ...

    This is because by having this symbol a manufacturer/importer makes a declaration that the product complies with this law. So for example, Tesco sells a product and it does not have the CE symbol, then Tesco are breaking the law.

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    His report points out terrible acts carried out by these soldiers that showed that the people in higher ranks where not behaving adequately and allowing such acts to take place or that their where not aware of such events which makes matters even worse as it shows a complete lack

  1. You have been asked to write a report for the court about a case, ...

    is being prosecuted for GBH. The witness Mrs P. is the main prosecution witness. She is a 40 year old, white married woman who lives on the same estate as the defendant. The witness' evidence Mrs P. claims that she was walking down the High Street in her town on her way to play bingo.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Both convicted M appealed - said judge didn't give Nedrick direction Judge was right - not exceptional case (not oblique intention) COA said this was not a rare and exceptional case where N direction was needed. In cases were there is a direct attack on victim, it was unlikely that

  1. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    To investigate the distribution of crime and the characteristics of criminals, criminologists examine such factors as their age, sex, ethnic background, social class, and place of residence. Criminologists are also interested in the causes of crime. The Italian physician Cesare Lombroso (1836-1909), who is often identified as the first empirical

  2. 'The European Court of Justice played a decisive role in the transformation of the ...

    court applied for an Article 234 reference about whether they were to apply the Merchant Shipping Act 1988. As the process of ruling normally takes eighteen months, the UK applied for another ruling asking whether in the meantime they should still apply the Act as it conflicted with Articles 52 and 221 of the Treaty of Rome.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work