• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The British Constitution.

Extracts from this document...


The British Constitution The constitution of Britain has traditionally been split between royal prerogative statutes, common law, convention, convention and authoritative opinion. But recent external developments such as the European Union (EU) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) have had a strong influence on Britain. The Royal Prerogative are a set of privileges that the Royal family since the Middle Ages. However, as the power of the monarchy declined, the power was now with the Prime minister and his cabinet. Some of the Royal Prerogatives include the powers to declare war, make treaties, issue orders to armed forces and dissolve parliament. ...read more.


The Haebus Corpus Act (1679) which stated that anyone who has been arrested must be brought before a court for a just trial and The Devolution reforms for Wales and Scotland (1997-98) which allowed the two countries to have their own parliament. In theory, parliament can pass any law it wishes but because of the membership to the EU in 1972, European Law is binding on all member states and therefore takes precedence over domestic law. Common Law is the law made by judges which have been gradually been accepted over a period of time. ...read more.


There is no law saying there must be a cabinet, it only exists by convention. Some conventions of the British Constitution are; The Monarch must not refuse to assent to any law passes by two houses; The Housel of Lords pass financial bills without reviews and the Prime Minister fixes the date of an election and not the party. The EU is a source of the modern constitution. If a legal dispute containing an EU reaches the House of Lords the final court of appeal, there must be an application for a ruling to the European Court of Justice. The introduction of the domestic Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) provides a further constitutional source. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    Tyrone could sue the officer to court for an unlawful arrest and be found not guilty like the case of Osman Vs DPP. Osman was found not guilty by the Queen's Bench Divisional Court of assaulting the police officer because he was unlawfully arrested as no reasons were provided.

  2. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    Yet, upon a rehearing of the case, the House of Lords decided that the charges in question were crimes against humanity and there was a universal jurisdiction to extradite or punish a public official for torture. The decision was qualified by the International Convention against Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, which did not extend immunity to heads of state.

  1. Contact orders

    Even though the young people are more listened to and decisions taken in their best interests6 the domestic courts must take into account the non resident parents' human rights when deciding the outcome of the case as was held in Somnerfeld v Germany (2003).

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Only bills of exchange can be dishonored by non-acceptance, since only bills of exchange require acceptance. Promissory notes, bills of exchange and checks can be dishonored by non-payment. Dishonor by non-acceptance 1. "When after due presentation, the bill is not accepted by drawee."

  1. prisoners rights

    a conditional release of an individual from prison after he has served part of the sentence imposed upon him. Chapter 20 of the Report of All India Committee on Jail Reforms (1980-83) chapter deals with the system of remission, leave and premature release.

  2. Poverty and the British State 1850-50

    Jeremy and Chadwick concluded that the old poor law failed to do this and that since paupers were a minority the majorities needs were being sacrificed for a lazy minority. Chadwick also believed that the poor law was inefficiently controlled locally and that there should be a uniformity in control and that the poor law should be centrally controlled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work