• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law One way of looking at criminal law is that it is dealing with something of public awareness. For instance, the public has awareness in seeing that people are protected from being robbed or assaulted. These are legal problems that fall into the criminal law. Criminal law involves punishing and rehabilitating offenders, and protecting the public. Since the public has an interest in having criminal law, we give the government the power to put it in place and enforce it. The police and Crown Prosecutors are hired by the government to put the criminal law into effect. Public funds are used to pay for these services. If you are the injured party of a crime, you report it to the police and they have the duty to investigate. They arrest and charge the suspect. In most cases, if a charge has been properly laid and if there is evidence supporting it, the Crown Prosecutor, not the person who complains of the incident, prosecutes it in the courts. ...read more.

Middle

This is not the case in civil law. Civil law is about private disputes between individuals or between individuals and organizations. Civil matters include areas such as contract law, family law, tort law, property law and labour law. The person suing for a wrong has the burden of proving their case on a "balance of probabilities." This means that a judge or jury must believe their story and evidence more than the defendant's version. They do not need to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. Civil disputes usually involve some harm, loss or injury to one party or their property. Unlike criminal law; however, civil law is primarily involved with compensating victims. If a civil action is successful, the defendant will be responsible for the wrongful action. While a defendant in a criminal case may be found "guilty" or "not guilty," a defendant in a civil case is said to be "liable" or "not liable" for damages. ...read more.

Conclusion

Specifically, the definition of first degree murder in the context of the O.J. case requires that the act be done deliberately and with a great deal of malice directed toward the victim. And to convict in the criminal court, the case against the defendant must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case for wrongful death, on the other hand, you have to show only that the defendant was legally responsible for the death. But, to get punitive damages, as the plaintiffs did in the O.J. case, you have to show that the defendant acted recklessly. The burden of proof in a civil case is preponderance of the evidence -- a much lesser burden than is required in a criminal case. So, while a criminal jury might reasonably fail to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and acquit the accused, a civil jury might also reasonably find by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she acted recklessly and should be held civilly accountable for the death. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    fixed by law, * offences for which a person of 21 years of age or over may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years, * conspiring to commit an offence, * attempting to commit an offence, * inciting, aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of an

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    His standard of care when driving on a public road was to be assessed objectively disregarding any mental capacity, just as any physical infirmity or inexperience would be disregarded if the defendant elected to drive. 3.Intelligence The defendant's actions must conform to certain criteria expected of a person of normal intelligence in a given situation.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Bedder was judged as a non impotent man when in fact he was an impotent youth. The 1957 statute talked about a reasonable person, but gave no guidelines as to what this meant. R v Camplin (1978) - Camplin was 14 and he had been rapped by an adult man.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    She commissions others to do the actual writing: "Sche hath [Aella's] lettres overseie / And formed in an other weie" (CA 2.1011-12). But the Man of Law restores the proscribed "mannish" agency of Trevet's Domild, putting the pen back into his Donegild's hand, so to speak.

  1. Distinction Between Criminal And Civil Law.

    Company law is very important in the business world: it regulates how a company should be formed, sets out formal rules for running companies, and deals with the rights and duties of shareholders and directors.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    can see that the age varies from country to country and in some cases quite broadly. The Ministry of Justice said "We do not intend to raise the age of criminal responsibility. It is not in the interests of justice, of victims or the young people themselves to prevent serious offending being challenged".

  1. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Interview of Key Witnesses. As a matter of policy, a clear strategy should be determined early in the inquiry to interview and record statements where necessary from key individuals. It is crucial that such witnesses are located and interviewed quickly, otherwise their varying accounts will be clouded by time and confused with accounts they have heard from elsewhere.

  2. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    The defence advocate represents the person who is accused of a crime. They do this by questioning the prosecution evidence, and presenting their own evidence on behalf of the defendant. If the defendant is found guilty, the defence advocate will then present the judge with reasons why leniency should be shown in sentencing, this is called mitigation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work