• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law

Extracts from this document...


The Difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law One way of looking at criminal law is that it is dealing with something of public awareness. For instance, the public has awareness in seeing that people are protected from being robbed or assaulted. These are legal problems that fall into the criminal law. Criminal law involves punishing and rehabilitating offenders, and protecting the public. Since the public has an interest in having criminal law, we give the government the power to put it in place and enforce it. The police and Crown Prosecutors are hired by the government to put the criminal law into effect. Public funds are used to pay for these services. If you are the injured party of a crime, you report it to the police and they have the duty to investigate. They arrest and charge the suspect. In most cases, if a charge has been properly laid and if there is evidence supporting it, the Crown Prosecutor, not the person who complains of the incident, prosecutes it in the courts. ...read more.


This is not the case in civil law. Civil law is about private disputes between individuals or between individuals and organizations. Civil matters include areas such as contract law, family law, tort law, property law and labour law. The person suing for a wrong has the burden of proving their case on a "balance of probabilities." This means that a judge or jury must believe their story and evidence more than the defendant's version. They do not need to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. Civil disputes usually involve some harm, loss or injury to one party or their property. Unlike criminal law; however, civil law is primarily involved with compensating victims. If a civil action is successful, the defendant will be responsible for the wrongful action. While a defendant in a criminal case may be found "guilty" or "not guilty," a defendant in a civil case is said to be "liable" or "not liable" for damages. ...read more.


Specifically, the definition of first degree murder in the context of the O.J. case requires that the act be done deliberately and with a great deal of malice directed toward the victim. And to convict in the criminal court, the case against the defendant must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case for wrongful death, on the other hand, you have to show only that the defendant was legally responsible for the death. But, to get punitive damages, as the plaintiffs did in the O.J. case, you have to show that the defendant acted recklessly. The burden of proof in a civil case is preponderance of the evidence -- a much lesser burden than is required in a criminal case. So, while a criminal jury might reasonably fail to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and acquit the accused, a civil jury might also reasonably find by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she acted recklessly and should be held civilly accountable for the death. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    General arrest conditions are: * that the name of the relevant person is unknown to, they cannot be readily ascertained by, the constable, * that the constable has reasonable grounds for doubting whether a name furnished by the relevant person as his name is his real name; * the person

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    This argument aims at the very root of the formulation of the reasonable man concept as its basic reason for being brought into existence is to create a universal bench mark or yard stick. Still this argument has been successfully countered by many authors in various ways.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Pleading an intoxication defence for murder can result in a finding of involuntary manslaughter. Pleading diminished responsibility as a defence can lead to a finding of guilty of voluntary manslaughter. The impact of the defence on the burden of proof A diminished responsibility can lead to a very bizarre situation.

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    members of both these Public services have every reason to have pride in their work and in the belonging to these services. This is the feeling of companionship between you and your colleagues, the feeling that you are a team and feel proud of the work you are doing.

  1. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    In all areas of human activities causing death is not viewed as a satisfactory solution for dealing with individuals who for one reason or another find themselves in extreme or difficult situations. 16Vast public resources are devoted towards tackling the under lying problem and all other avenues are exhausted before killing.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    RESPONSIBILITY Switzerland, Nigeria, Africa 7 Scotland, Sri Lanka 8 England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Australia, New Zealand 10 Netherlands, Canada, Greece, Turkey 12 France 13 Italy, Germany, Bulgaria, Romania, China 14 Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Czech Republic, New York, South Carolina 15 Spain, Japan, Texas, Poland 16 Belgium, Luxembourg 18 We

  1. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    The cost to go to court and be efficiently represented is very costly therefore it excludes many people. Case hearings can go on for a long time and the accused may be held on remand or bail while waiting for the trial.

  2. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    If this does not happen then the defendant will then return to the court at a later date for sentencing. How effective is trial by jury? Arguments in favour of trial by jury. Lord Denning put the arguments in favour of trial by jury in the following civil case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work