• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The duties of Magestrates and Juries.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Part A) Magistrates have a large range of duties, but they are mainly connected to criminal cases, totaling more than two million cases a year. However, Lay Magistrates deal with some civil cases; these tend to be family cases. Out of all criminal cases, 97% of them are dealt with by Lay Magistrates and in the other 3%, Lay Magistrates will hear the preliminary hearings, such as Early Administrative Hearings, and some Committal proceedings. To hear family cases including protection orders such as the protection against violence there is a special panel of Magistrates. Lay Magistrates will also decide bail after a suspected offender has been arrested and charged. The defendant may be released on bail by the police, but it is otherwise the magistrates' duty to decide whether he should be bailed or remanded in custody pending trial. In a summary trial the magistrates are the sole judges of fact and law (though they may seek the Clerk's advice on matters of law), and must determine an appropriate sentence in the event of a conviction. ...read more.

Middle

The jury's role in a criminal trial is to act as judge of fact. Sometimes there is a direct conflict of evidence and the jury must then use their experience of human nature in deciding who to believe is right. In other cases, there are more complex issues of reasonableness to be resolved, and the jury's task would be more difficult. A juror should have experience of life rather than on any specialized legal knowledge making it appropriate that it should be left to them, such as in R v Litchfield in 1998, when a ship foundered off the Cornish coast and three crewmembers were drowned. Having allegedly followed an unsafe course and relied too heavily on his engines even though he knew the fuel was contaminated the ship's master was tried for manslaughter. Affirming his conviction and sentence of 18 months' imprisonment, the Court of Appeal said it is up to the jury to decide whether negligence is gross negligence. They rejected an argument that since negligently endangering a ship is a statutory offence, it is nonsense to let the jury decide whether a defendant's behavior amounts to a crime: the question for the jury is whether it amounts to the crime of manslaughter. ...read more.

Conclusion

They refused to find the defendants guilty as instructed, in spite of being shut up without food or drink, and following their verdict the Recorder of London directed they be imprisoned for contempt. Vaughan CJ granted a writ of Habeas Corpus for their release; once the jury has given their verdict, the judge has no option but to accept it. In section 17 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967, if defendant pleads not guilty and the prosecutor proposes to offer no evidence, the court may order that a verdict Of not guilty be recorded, or the jury to be directed return such a verdict. This was carried out in the R v Ferguson case in 1970 when the defendant was charged with driving after the consumption of excess alcohol. The defendant pled not guilty, but the facts were undisputed. There was an argument as to the validity of the procedure adopted. The Deputy Chairman ruled that the procedure was valid and directed the jury to return a verdict of guilty. The direction was upheld by the Court of Appeal. Law Homework 7: Lay People 5/4/07 Daniel Shuck Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    Also section 54 of the criminal procedure and investigation act provides that where a person has been acquitted of an offence and someone is subsequently convicted of interfering with or intimidating jurors or witnesses in the case then the high court can quash the acquittal and the person can be retried.

  2. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    The practice theory i.e. Hart's characterisation of the internal aspect of law, fails to capture the normative nature of laws generally. If rules are practices, i.e. because others conform to the rule and criticise deviation from it, they will only rarely be a reason for action.

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    The procedure can be used to review the legality of EU regulations, directives or decisions, on the grounds that proper procedures have not been followed, the provisions infringe the treaty or any rule relating to its application, or powers have been misused.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Where a check is crossed generally or specially, the holder- may add the words 'not negotiable'. (iv) Where a check is crossed specially, the- banker to whom it is crossed -may again cross it especially to another banker as his agent for collection.

  1. essay discussing the advantages and disadvanteges of lay magistrates

    When applying for the job there is little compensation for loss of earnings for the time missed when applying to the council and the training. This discourages working class people from applying. Whereas for people who are well of, will be more inclined to as they wont have any worried about loss of money.

  2. Contact orders

    have been made especially in the light of the possibility of 'parental alienation syndrome'. *** In Re: S (minor) (independent representation) (1993)8 the court held that "children have different levels of understanding at the same age. And understanding is not absolute.

  1. Discover whether, in the criminal law, negligence ever breaks the chain of causation and ...

    if he had been driving properly he could not have avoided her. D did "cause" her death in the literal sense because she wouldn't have died if he hadn't been driving the cart but he was not responsible for it in criminal law because it was shown that the death was not due to his negligence.

  2. Bail & Mode of Trial - Baldric is charged with the theft of ...

    whilst on bail and whether he would interfere with justice by tampering with evidence or witnesses. In order to asses whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a defendant may meet one of these criteria the court will use these next points to help them decide on the risk.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work