• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NATIVE TITLE

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NATIVE TITLE The debate about native title issues has tended to see issues from idealistic perspectives ignoring the practical realities that native title poses to governments, industry and indigenous people. The implementation of the Native Title is an appropriate and significant aspect of Australia's common and statute law, which effectively strives to develop a fair outcome for all Australian citizens. The Native Title Act 1993, like the court Mabo decision in 1992, transforms the ways in, which indigenous ownership of land may be formally recognised and incorporated within Australian legal and property regimes. The process of implementation, however, raises a number of crucial issues of concern to native title claimants and to other interested parties. These issues will need to be settled in court however, despite the many disputes between opposing stakeholders, the Australian Native Title effectively reaches the best and fairest possible outcomes for all Australian citizens. ...read more.

Middle

The decision of the Mabo case effectively benefits the many aboriginals whose ancestors where unfortunate having had their land and homes invaded by Europeans in 1788. There are many stakeholders involved in the dispute revolving around native title however, both the statue and common law is effective in producing the fairest possible outcomes for all parties involved. The process of claiming land in more complex then simply applying for the claim, for native title to exist there must be an ongoing link between the current inhabitant and the ancestors form pre-colonial times. Native title can be extinguished is the holders lose their connection with the land. The Government believes it has provided a fair and balanced framework for the future by adopting the Native Title Act in 1993. The interpretation of native title is often misunderstood, which results in the establishment many negative opinions regarding native claims. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although the title provides the fairest possible outcomes for most stakeholders, there are certain aspects of the law they could be reconsidered and amended. These features include the Wik case, which sets the principle that the granting of pastoral lease does not necessarily extinguish native title rights, the situation regarding miners and the complexity of the legislation, which causes understanding problems for the indigenous people. Despite these small problems, the native title is an effective aspect of our common and statute law, which strives to achieve fair results for all citizens. Today we understand that the aboriginal's form of ownership of the land extends back more the 40,000 years, which is recognised in the Australian Native Title. This important aspect of Australia's common and statue law should be further taught in schools, universities and to the community because of its ongoing political, social, cultural and legal significance. Native title was adopted not only to benefit indigenous citizens but also the Australian society as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good essay about the foundations of native title but where is the analysis of effectiveness?

Issues to be explored include: native title within the 'hierarchy' of Australian property rights; the difficulty of proving the ongoing connection to the land native title is claimed over (issues of evidence, the break in connection caused by WW2 etc.); issues related to numerous native title groups (overlapping claims and disagreements etc.); insufficiency of compensation; financial issues (eg. up to 80% of funds lost to experts); biased arbitration process; no veto rights and compulsory acquisition.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the role and effectiveness of the law commission

    3 star(s)

    The commission will then publish a consultation paper which will seek the opinions on the reform. This paper will describe the current law and shows the problems and also look for options on reformation. Following this, the commission will draw up positive proposals for reformation which will be presented in

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    It can only be authorised for the entry and search of premises if: - it is not practicable to communicate with any person entitled to grant entry to the premises; - it is practicable to communicate with a person entitled to grant entry to the premises but it is not

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    have pleaded guilty the evidence will still have to be gone through. After the magistrates have heard the trial they will make a decision on weather they have enough authority to sentence you, seeing they maximum penalty they can give is 6 months in prison.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Victim died days later after medical treatment. Dears defence was that victim had reopened or neglected the wounds. Appeal is rejected COA - "Only a daft response by the victim would break the chain of causation" 4. MEDICAL PROFESSION R v Jordan (1956) - Victim stabbed and went to hospital.

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    The most popular explanation of the rationality for the formation of the concept of reasonable man has been explained below. To offer an account of how reasonableness is embodied in many men, an account of the social structure of reasonableness will be sufficient way of backing the concept of reasonable man.

  2. Is the imposition of strict liability ever justifiable in criminal law?

    It can be argued that the imposition of strict liability here is well justified. This is another advantage to the imposition of strict liability; in many offences, mens rea may be very difficult to prove.

  1. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    most people go to the cinema on a Saturday night, this regular conduct does not demonstrate that there is an accepted rule that one ought to go to the cinema on a Saturday night. There can be no criticism for a failure to maintain a habit.

  2. 'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

    offence (exception to this are reporting a court case, a police statement, or the report is covered by privilege). If the journalist has reported that a person is suspected of being guilty then they need to prove there are 'reasonable grounds' for suspicion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work