• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The flaw.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE fLAW Food, clothing, shelter. Okay what next. Security?,freedom? So how would one feel if one were lawfully and socially denied of the need which appears just above food, clothing, and shelter on Maslow's hierarchy of needs. I am talking about homosexuality and section 377 of the Indian penal code, which criminalises male homosexuality. The major debates and discussions concerning gay men and lesbians revolve around article 377 of the Indian penal code, no other laws directly deals with homosexuality, as if homosexuality does not exist in india. Because of this ostrich like attitude there is no overt discrimination but covert discrimination against gay men and lesbians runs throughout the gamut of laws. The nature of the law is: - "Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of the nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished with (imprisonment for life) ...read more.

Middle

The law ciminalises it because according to the lawmakers it is unnatural. But what poves it to be unnatural? The fact that human perpetuation is not possible in homosexual relationship, or that the other way round has been preferred and practiced for years does suffice enough for it to be termed as unnatural and hence a criminal offence. Isn't this countered with the fact that inspite of it being termed as criminal offence, inspite of the strong social stigma attached to it, it hasn't c eased to exist even over so many years. I think, it is a natural urge, and it's a matter of great shame that in a democratic country like ours it is criminalised. Denying to accept homosexual relationships is denying an individual, fulfillment of his needs of companionship security, freedom and love, all which form a base of human existence. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thirdly, because of the moral stigma attached to homosexuality per se, gay men and lesbians are affected by a number of laws that criminalise actions and other objects considered as immoral or scandalous according to the governing ethics of the society. So a person pursuing a homosexual relationship is denied his/her rights to have a family, his/her entitlement to the deceased spouse's assets and definitely social acceptance. Well to put it in short I would like to say that his/her sheer existence is denied in the society. What more can one be deprived of. Well nothing in world is permanent and so is the case with laws. Homosexuality must be decriminalsed. It is important to have law that goes beyond the existing one and redefines the word 'family'. Let us all act as matured citizens and fight for the legal and social acceptance of homosexual relationships and accept their companionship as constituting families. Kinjal sampat ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    saying it had nothing to do with Brown because Brown was homosexual and he was not Appeal failed. Criticisms of the defence of consent 1. Consent and the level of harm It seems quite clear starting with Donovan and more recently Emmett that consent cannot extend to s47 ABH.

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    The Court of Appeal in the case of Naomi Campbell recognised that an action of right to privacy was developing in the wake of the HRA 1998. However the court reiterated that there was no freestanding tort of infringement of privacy, but only an action, which can be bought under a breach of confidence.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Thus, the collecting banker must act like a blood hound and make proper enquiries as to the title of the last endorsee (whether endorsement in his favor is genuine or not) from the original payee named in the check before collecting an `Account Payee' crossed check in his (i.e., the last endorsee)

  2. The case R.V Machekequonabe, a pagan Indian prisoner.

    According the facts, the answer would be no. Machekequonabe believed he was shooting at a wendigo in the attempts to protect himself and those in the camp. There was no intention for harming another person, and Machekequonabe did make attempts to correctly identify his target by shouting at him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work