• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The history of Equity.

Extracts from this document...


Equity. In 1066 when William the conqueror came to England the law was very different from today. Itinerant judges who would travel around the country settling any disputes administrated it. They started out using local laws and applying these to cases before them. However, the Normans were keen to develop a law which they could apply to the whole country, a law which would be common to every one. So they gathered what was considered to be the best of different local laws and developed a common law. Soon though many problems were found with common law. It soon became too ridged. Two of the main problems with common law were, that it didn't offer sufficient remedies and, a civil action could only be taken by use of a "writ." A writ was used to set out the cause of the action and the grounds for the claim. The writ became a problem because it had to be made to fit and existing writ. To start with a new writ was created when a suitable previous case could not be found however, it was soon stopped and no new writs could be issued. This meant that some cases were unable to be pursued, as an existing writ that suited the case could not be found. ...read more.


One of these occasions was the earl of oxfords case in 1615. it was a very important cases because it decided that whenever equity and common law were in conflict equity will prevail, in this case the lease to convent garden had been bought by merton college, then the college sold the lease to the earl of oxford. With the use of an elizabethian statute the college reclaimed the land as the statute forbade the land to be sold. The college claimed the sale was void. According to common law the earl would have to give up the land as the statute said it was forbidden for it to be sold, however according to equity the college had acted unfairly and the earl would be allowed to keep the land. These to views totally contradicted one another so I was down to the king to decide what action should be taken. The king then ruled that in cases where common law and equity are in conflict equity will prevail. Because of the kings ruling the two courts were never in conflict but they still ran as two separate courts. However, in 1873-1875 there were judicature acts, which now meant that the two courts were finally combined. ...read more.


However, these remedies may be refused if the claimant breaks one of the maxims of equity. The maxims are rules about who is entitled to equity as, just like common law equity bases decision on previous cases. The more common maxims are: 1. He who comes to equity must come with clean hands 2. Delay defeats equity 3. He who seeks equity must do equity For example, a company threatens to fire its employees if the don't come off strike in ten day. Ten days later and they don't come off strike and the company fires them. Because of the he who seeks equity must do equity maxim the employees would not receive an equitable remedy, as they did not treat the company fairly. Equity is definitely a vital part of English law. It plays an important role in the courts today. Although common law is vital as it offers a great stability and certain predictability to the law equity must also be used. Equity offers a fair decision in the cases where common law doesn't. Also if following common law judges may have to follow decisions they felt were wrong, this is not so with equity. Equity today has become a more fixed system then it was when it started so that it is more constant now. Which means it has the chance to offer people a fair remedy and decision but is not completely unreliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    intoxicated Reforms of intoxication * 1995 Draft Intoxication & Criminal Liability Act produced by the law commission 1. The difference between specific and basic intent crimes for the purpose of intoxication should be abolished 2. The defence of intoxicated mistake should be allowed as this is usually the case 3.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The payee's, or holder's, only recourse is against the drawer. (The drawer, however, may subsequently hold the bank liable for its wrongful refusal to pay.) Cashier's Checks Checks are usually three-party instruments, but on certain types of checks, the bank can serve as both the drawer and the drawee.

  1. Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have ...

    The couple knew about the builders were having financial difficulties. Later, the builders sued the couple for the balance of the payment, but the couple appealed that the court should grant promissory estoppel to make promises binding thou there are not, about the builders have consented to accept the amount paid by them.

  2. To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

    As a result, the process of conversion has taken far longer than expected8. It was not until 1990 that real progress was made when all land in England and Wales was subject to compulsory registration upon sale. Consequently, the registered system is now the accepted norm and it is estimated that 80% of all titles have now been registered9.

  1. Nowadays Equity has become more rigid and has certain rules which must be obeyed ...

    This was not always suitable. An example of this is if for example a farmer promised a client that he would sell his best pig to him, then backed out of the deal, the client would not want money to compensate for this loss, but the pig to be sold to him.

  2. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    most people go to the cinema on a Saturday night, this regular conduct does not demonstrate that there is an accepted rule that one ought to go to the cinema on a Saturday night. There can be no criticism for a failure to maintain a habit.

  1. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    The two systems are coming ever closer but strictly speaking they are not fused. The maxims of equity embody the general principles which have evolved from the Court of Chancery. They are not rules which must be rigorously applied in every case but have more of a guideline effect.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    And the reason the virago evoked such cultural scorn was because, as Gavin Douglas phrased it, she transgressed traditional gender roles by "exersand a mannis office." The virago became a standard monitory topos of later medieval antifeminist satire and discourse.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work