Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Law
  • Document length: 1268 words

'The law on robbery has been confusing for the courts to apply, and such difficulties require Parliament to intervene and update the law on this subject.' Discuss.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

20/4/05 'The law on robbery has been confusing for the courts to apply, and such difficulties require Parliament to intervene and update the law on this subject.' Discuss. The law on robbery is contained in the Theft Act 1968; an act in which the government attempted to clarify the law on theft and related offences. Robbery as an offence can be seen as an aggravated theft - it is necessary that the elements of theft be satisfied before the prosecution can attempt to achieve a successful conviction for robbery. While the law surrounding the offence of Theft has been subject to deliberation and criticism since the passing of the act, the law on robbery has proved equally difficult to apply. It is because of this that many legal commentators and reform groups have proclaimed the need for updated legislation on the subject. S8(2) Theft Act 1968 provides that the maximum sentence for a conviction of Theft is life imprisonment, making it the most serious of the theft offences. The government however has taken an increasingly strict attitude towards the offence, and s2 Crime (Sentences)

Middle

These elements will not be satisfied, if the defendant uses force, and then goes on to steal. But in the interests of public liberty and safety, the courts have been prepared to take a more pragmatic approach to this definition. In the case of Hale [1978], the defendants argued that although they had forced their way into the victim's house and stolen jewelry, they only had to restrain her and tie her up, as they left the house. They argued therefore that the theft was over when the theft took place. To avoid the defendants escaping a conviction, the courts decided that 'the act of appropriation does not suddenly cease. It is a continuous act and it is a matter for the jury to decide whether or not the act of appropriation has finished'. While some may see this as a sensible move in order to secure the convictions of violent offenders, others may criticise the courts decision to depart from the directions given in the act, and therefore to bypass Parliament's intentions. When devising this section of the law, The Criminal Law Revision Committee made it clear that there had to be more than a mere snatching of property from an unresisting owner because it could be held to be robbery.

Conclusion

The Divisional Court came to the decision that the 'appropriation' necessary to satisfy the theft element was present, as appropriation was defined as an 'assumption of rights of the true owner', which made it clear that although the defendants had not taken the handbag, they had still assumed the rights of the owner and successfully appropriated it. The Divisional Court also had no doubts that the required force was present and therefore stated that 'there cannot possibly be, save for the instance where a handbag is carried away from the scene... a clearer instance of robbery' and the convictions were successful. In conclusion the courts do seem to face a problem when attempting to maintain a fair approach towards robbery. While legislation like the Crime (Sentences) Act evidently shows that Parliament wish to take a very strict approach towards this offence, this also makes the job of the courts considerably more difficult. While few would disagree that the circumstances described in cases like Clouden and Dawson amount to robbery, such offences do not appear to be the most serious robbery cases. It therefore seems that the current state of the law on robbery restricts the courts, from providing fair punishments.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Cheshire was said to be the operative and substantial cause of death and the treatment was only poor. R v Mellor (1996) - Mellor assaults and old woman and breaks some ribs and cheek bones. She dies 2 days later from pneumonia.

  2. Law : Juries & Judges

    The disadvantage to this is that jurors can just acquit people, just as in my example; this case may have been a way in which people could have protested in the flaws of the law as the time between the crime and conviction were an extraordinary amount.

  1. LAND LAW

    even in such a case, the court could impute such an intention if in the court's opinion it would have been formed by reasonable partners had they given any thought to it. In extending this argument, in Gissing v Gissing11 Lord Diplock asserted that the courts could not impute such

  2. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    but if he continues on his way then the community will end up paying well over a million dollars to fun the policing, the courts, and the jail terms needed to service his dysfunctional life." The Juvenile Justice process in Australia involves the police, courts, Juvenile Justice Departments, young people and their families, legal advocates and Non Government Institutions.

  1. Critically evaluate the changes which have been made since 1990 to the definition of ...

    Furthermore, rape by a husband, was generally assumed to be precipitated by other events that had a bearing on the overall quality of the relationship, for example, marital rape was sometimes viewed as reflecting a poor marital relationship with the possibility of culpability on each side.15 The common law rule

  2. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    The publication must be likely to "deprave and corrupt" such people. It is no defence that the article will only be seen by people who are already depraved and corrupted. Perjury, in criminal law, wilful false statement made under oath with respect to a material matter, either in a legal

  1. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    The magistrates' court is primarily a criminal court, though magistrates also sit in the Family Proceedings Court and have some civil and administrative functions too. After a suspected offender has been arrested and charged, he may be released on bail by the police, but it is otherwise the magistrates' duty

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    US patent law has a long history, dating back to 1790. The original patent law was a primitive one, but we see the importance of this idea simply through the fact that the framers of the Constitution would think to include such a clause.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.