• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The law on robbery has been confusing for the courts to apply, and such difficulties require Parliament to intervene and update the law on this subject.' Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

20/4/05 'The law on robbery has been confusing for the courts to apply, and such difficulties require Parliament to intervene and update the law on this subject.' Discuss. The law on robbery is contained in the Theft Act 1968; an act in which the government attempted to clarify the law on theft and related offences. Robbery as an offence can be seen as an aggravated theft - it is necessary that the elements of theft be satisfied before the prosecution can attempt to achieve a successful conviction for robbery. While the law surrounding the offence of Theft has been subject to deliberation and criticism since the passing of the act, the law on robbery has proved equally difficult to apply. It is because of this that many legal commentators and reform groups have proclaimed the need for updated legislation on the subject. S8(2) Theft Act 1968 provides that the maximum sentence for a conviction of Theft is life imprisonment, making it the most serious of the theft offences. The government however has taken an increasingly strict attitude towards the offence, and s2 Crime (Sentences) ...read more.

Middle

These elements will not be satisfied, if the defendant uses force, and then goes on to steal. But in the interests of public liberty and safety, the courts have been prepared to take a more pragmatic approach to this definition. In the case of Hale [1978], the defendants argued that although they had forced their way into the victim's house and stolen jewelry, they only had to restrain her and tie her up, as they left the house. They argued therefore that the theft was over when the theft took place. To avoid the defendants escaping a conviction, the courts decided that 'the act of appropriation does not suddenly cease. It is a continuous act and it is a matter for the jury to decide whether or not the act of appropriation has finished'. While some may see this as a sensible move in order to secure the convictions of violent offenders, others may criticise the courts decision to depart from the directions given in the act, and therefore to bypass Parliament's intentions. When devising this section of the law, The Criminal Law Revision Committee made it clear that there had to be more than a mere snatching of property from an unresisting owner because it could be held to be robbery. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Divisional Court came to the decision that the 'appropriation' necessary to satisfy the theft element was present, as appropriation was defined as an 'assumption of rights of the true owner', which made it clear that although the defendants had not taken the handbag, they had still assumed the rights of the owner and successfully appropriated it. The Divisional Court also had no doubts that the required force was present and therefore stated that 'there cannot possibly be, save for the instance where a handbag is carried away from the scene... a clearer instance of robbery' and the convictions were successful. In conclusion the courts do seem to face a problem when attempting to maintain a fair approach towards robbery. While legislation like the Crime (Sentences) Act evidently shows that Parliament wish to take a very strict approach towards this offence, this also makes the job of the courts considerably more difficult. While few would disagree that the circumstances described in cases like Clouden and Dawson amount to robbery, such offences do not appear to be the most serious robbery cases. It therefore seems that the current state of the law on robbery restricts the courts, from providing fair punishments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Co-defendants Appealed on the Maloney direction - jury not clear 2 miners aimed to stop miners going to work. Drop a concrete block onto the motorway to stop them. Hit taxi driver and kills him. Applying Maloney 1 = Yes Applying Maloney 2 = Yes, foresaw and did intend jury said.

  2. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    suspect in respect to a crime made before the start of that amendment, but only if the suspect is charged with the crime on or after that commencement. The NSW Attorney General John Hatzistergos states "the Government is pleased to introduce the Bail Amendment Bill 2007.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    When the drawee is a fictitious person or after reasonable search cannot be found. 5. Where the acceptance is a qualified one or where one or some of several drawees not being partners make default in acceptance, on being duly required to accept.

  2. Law : Juries & Judges

    Once you have been summoned, you then must await the date in which you have been given. Once you had arrived at the court, a court official would have been waiting for you, it is quite common if a security guard checked your bags.

  1. LAND LAW

    There is no clear and all-embracing definition of a constructive trust3; rather, it is a flexible concept which the courts of equity use to achieve justice in cases where it would be inequitable to allow the legal owner to claim the whole of the beneficial interest for himself.

  2. Critically evaluate the changes which have been made since 1990 to the definition of ...

    However parliament in the Sexual Offences Amendment Act 1976 confirmed this meaning when the phrase was reiterated. The main reason for the decision was that the social conditions and expectations had changed and that 'in modern times any reasonable person must regard Hale's view as quite unacceptable.'18 In making this

  1. prisoners rights

    This causes additional trauma. A liberalized view relatin to communication with kith and kin specially is desirable. It may be pointed out that though there may be some rationale for restricting visits, but insofar as communication by post is concerned, there does not seem be any plausible reason to deny easy facility to an inmate.

  2. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    occupants of the house and, without retreating, kill an assailant if necessary to repel the attack. Obscenity Laws, legal restrictions on the publication of words or other material on the grounds that they are too indecent to be acceptable to society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work