• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The law on robbery has been confusing for the courts to apply, and such difficulties require Parliament to intervene and update the law on this subject.' Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

20/4/05 'The law on robbery has been confusing for the courts to apply, and such difficulties require Parliament to intervene and update the law on this subject.' Discuss. The law on robbery is contained in the Theft Act 1968; an act in which the government attempted to clarify the law on theft and related offences. Robbery as an offence can be seen as an aggravated theft - it is necessary that the elements of theft be satisfied before the prosecution can attempt to achieve a successful conviction for robbery. While the law surrounding the offence of Theft has been subject to deliberation and criticism since the passing of the act, the law on robbery has proved equally difficult to apply. It is because of this that many legal commentators and reform groups have proclaimed the need for updated legislation on the subject. S8(2) Theft Act 1968 provides that the maximum sentence for a conviction of Theft is life imprisonment, making it the most serious of the theft offences. The government however has taken an increasingly strict attitude towards the offence, and s2 Crime (Sentences) ...read more.

Middle

These elements will not be satisfied, if the defendant uses force, and then goes on to steal. But in the interests of public liberty and safety, the courts have been prepared to take a more pragmatic approach to this definition. In the case of Hale [1978], the defendants argued that although they had forced their way into the victim's house and stolen jewelry, they only had to restrain her and tie her up, as they left the house. They argued therefore that the theft was over when the theft took place. To avoid the defendants escaping a conviction, the courts decided that 'the act of appropriation does not suddenly cease. It is a continuous act and it is a matter for the jury to decide whether or not the act of appropriation has finished'. While some may see this as a sensible move in order to secure the convictions of violent offenders, others may criticise the courts decision to depart from the directions given in the act, and therefore to bypass Parliament's intentions. When devising this section of the law, The Criminal Law Revision Committee made it clear that there had to be more than a mere snatching of property from an unresisting owner because it could be held to be robbery. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Divisional Court came to the decision that the 'appropriation' necessary to satisfy the theft element was present, as appropriation was defined as an 'assumption of rights of the true owner', which made it clear that although the defendants had not taken the handbag, they had still assumed the rights of the owner and successfully appropriated it. The Divisional Court also had no doubts that the required force was present and therefore stated that 'there cannot possibly be, save for the instance where a handbag is carried away from the scene... a clearer instance of robbery' and the convictions were successful. In conclusion the courts do seem to face a problem when attempting to maintain a fair approach towards robbery. While legislation like the Crime (Sentences) Act evidently shows that Parliament wish to take a very strict approach towards this offence, this also makes the job of the courts considerably more difficult. While few would disagree that the circumstances described in cases like Clouden and Dawson amount to robbery, such offences do not appear to be the most serious robbery cases. It therefore seems that the current state of the law on robbery restricts the courts, from providing fair punishments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Cheshire was said to be the operative and substantial cause of death and the treatment was only poor. R v Mellor (1996) - Mellor assaults and old woman and breaks some ribs and cheek bones. She dies 2 days later from pneumonia.

  2. LAND LAW

    even in such a case, the court could impute such an intention if in the court's opinion it would have been formed by reasonable partners had they given any thought to it. In extending this argument, in Gissing v Gissing11 Lord Diplock asserted that the courts could not impute such

  1. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    Children's Court Act 1987 (NSW): Sets out the constitution and jurisdiction of the Children's Court The Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW): creates a scheme that presents alternative procedure to court proceeding for dealing with juveniles who commit certain crimes. Bail Act Amendments 2007: lengthens the grant of bail to a

  2. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    7500 were tried by the magistrates (and 7200 of them convicted), and 6000 prosecutions were discontinued or charges withdrawn. Magistrates courts also deal with civil actions for the non-payment of council tax and certain other taxes and utility bills, and sit as "youth courts" to deal with young people accused

  1. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights stipulates comparable legal justification in court for arrest or detention. (See also detention without trial.) police, a body of civilian officers with particular responsibility for upholding the law and maintaining public order through crime prevention and crime investigation.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    in that case. If it is 'payable on demand' then it must be made (payable to order.' However, on being endorsed in blank subsequently, it can become 'payable to bearer on demand.' (iii) A check drawn on a bank can be originally made 'payable to bearer on demand' and it shall be valid.

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    One who kills to protect property is guilty of manslaughter, and if the killing is premeditated it may be murder. The law also recognizes a distinct right to protect the home. A person inside his or her own dwelling may forcibly resist attacks upon himself or herself and the other

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    US patent law has a long history, dating back to 1790. The original patent law was a primitive one, but we see the importance of this idea simply through the fact that the framers of the Constitution would think to include such a clause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work