Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Mabo Case. Outline the main events and characters in this case. Give a clear account of why the judge and jury came to their decision.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3. Case Study - select a famous Australian Legal Case. Outline the main events and characters in this case. Give a clear account of why the judge and jury came to their decision. The Mabo Case The Mabo case commenced in the late 70's about an Aborigine Eddie Mabo who fought for his land on Murray Island, part of the Torres Strait. The issue that started the court case was when Mr Mabo appealed for a permit from the Queensland Government to visit the island. His proposal was declineed so he was unable to return home to visit his homeland. In 1981, in James Cook University where Eddie Mabo was working at the time, the students called a discussion on land rights in Australia. ...read more.

Middle

The Queensland Government acted in response and they passed an unexpected piece of legislation through the House without any debate - the Torres Strait Islands Coastal Islands Bill. The Act quoted: 'Any rights that Torres Strait Islanders had to land after the claim of sovereignty in 1879 is hereby extinguished without compensation'. This was how the Mabo case started with an honourable aim. The main aim of the case was to prove that the Queensland Government breached the Bill breached the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975. It was also a case to make the Commonwealth government aware that Native Australians had the right to the so called "terra nullius", the name given to Australia when the Europeans first arrived meaning empty land. ...read more.

Conclusion

A landstorm victory with a six to one majority in th High court all agreeing to the appeal brought forward by Eddie Mabo in the 80's. If the case had concerned itself solely with the Murray Islands and Eddie Mabo's claim then it would certainly have been important - a matter of great legal interest, but no more. The Court could have just said that Murray Island was a unique case and that no one else could say that the Court's verdict had any relevance for other parts of Australia. But the High Court took the opposite view. It decided that here was a chance, never yet presented to the High Court of Australia, to deal with the fundamental issue of land rights. So they quite deliberately took on the basic principles of Australian land law. That is why the case has been so significant. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

    If a discrepancy does occur the Act13 provides that it may be rectified and compensation is available to those adversely affected14. This is a strong benefit of the system as it ensures certainty and makes it safe to rely on the register.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    of a check in a civil suit if a check is not honored. If intent to defraud can be proved, the customer can also be subject to criminal prosecution for writing a bad check. The following case illustrates that when a bank agrees with a customer to pay overdrafts, the

  1. prisoners rights

    with no real effort being made to rise above the very minimum required for the meanest survival. Where prisoners worked, their remuneration was often a pittance, offering scant hope of savings being generated for future rehabilitation in society. By and large, the positive experiences were the exceptions rather than the

  2. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples

    In 1986, the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) released a report entitled Recognition Of Aboriginal Customary Laws, in which they made a number of recommendations, including the relevance of indigenous Australian customary laws in criminal sentencing. The ARLC recommended that legislation be passed to allow indigenous Australians who are knowledgeable

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work