• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of the police and safe guards provided for suspects.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Yasmin White 27th September 2002 The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of the police and safe guards provided for suspects One of the fundamental civil liberties is the right to freedom of your person from detention, and your property from seizure, without lawful cause. Recognition if this right goes back centuries in the history of Britain. Its fundamental expression is in the statement that we live in a country where one of the basic principles of the constitution is that our affairs shall be carried on under "the rule of law". In Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030 Lord Chief Justice Camden set out the basic principle that anyone who invades another's private property is guilty of an offence unless they can show a justification for having done so. The recognition of the right to liberty of the person, and freedom from interference with private property, underpins the torts of trespass to land and trespass to the person. It also underlies the defence to a charge of assault that the person was acting in self-defence against an unlawful detention. False imprisonment is based on the idea that there must be no deprivation of personal liberty without lawful authority. The powers given to the police to act to maintain public order and to prevent criminal acts and to apprehend and bring forward for punishment those who commit criminal acts, pose the greatest threat to liberty of the person. In their pursuit of evidence of wrongdoing, the police also have wide-ranging powers to enter and search private premises - in what would, barring the consent of the owner/occupier, otherwise amount to trespass - and to seize and take away private property found there. ...read more.

Middle

The constable shall answer on oath any question that the justice of the peace or judge hearing the application asks him. The warrant shall authorise an entry on one occasion only. A warrant to enter and search premises may be executed by any constable, entry and search under a warrant must be within one month from the date of its issue. Entry and search under a warrant must be at a reasonable hour unless it appears to the constable executing it that the purpose of a search may be frustrated on an entry at a reasonable hour. When the occupier of the premises is present, the constable: * shall identify himself to the occupier and, if not in uniform, shall produce to him documentary evidence that he is a constable; * shall produce a warrant to him, * shall supply him with a copy of it. A constable who is lawfully on any premises may seize anything on the premises if he has reasonable grounds for believing: * that it has been obtained in consequence of the commission of an offence: and * that it is necessary to seize it in order to prevent it being concealed, lost, damaged, altered or destroyed; * that it is evidence in relation to an offence which he is in investigating or any other offence. Anything which has been seized by a constable or taken away by a constable may be retained as long as is necessary, unless a photograph or copy would be sufficient for the purpose.' A magistrate can issue a search warrant, and a duty magistrate can issue warrants at hours other than when the courts are open. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is still no legal requirement to answer police questions, and, where by doing so you would incriminate yourself, it may often be better to make no comment to the police during interview. If the evidence against you is already strong, however, and you hope to be given a warning or caution by the police, rather than prosecuted in the courts, it may be best to admit the offence from the start. You may also receive credit in court for co-operating with the police. Conversely, if you have a strong defence to an accusation, putting it on the record straight away may lead to your avoiding being charged, or strengthen your defence when your case is heard in court. The decision whether or not to answer questions is often a difficult one, and it is best to take legal advice before making it. It is necessary to obtain a balance between protecting individual liberty and preventing/detecting crime, Parliament has tried to regulate this area of the law and the main police powers were set out in this Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. By looking at all these sections of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 I believe a satisfactory balance has been made between the Police powers and the Public's rights. However, exceptional cases do appear from time to time that tip this balance-for example it was seen that young black males were the cause of most crimes committed, and therefore have been targeted. Obviously there is problem with this. But generally, I believe there is a suitable balance. After the race riots of the 80's, it was felt that police powers had been diminished too extensively, so, the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, was introduced, it significantly extended police powers. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good example of where a student has failed to properly consider the question set and instead provides a description of the law.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the role and effectiveness of the law commission

    3 star(s)

    In the last 10 years parliament has lost interest in law reform, because of technical and uninteresting areas of law, also because there was not enough time to consider all proposals. The recent 5 year review has proved that the main problem with law reform is the inability of the departments to accept proposal and create an opportunity for discussion.

  2. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    Dear Bill, I am writing this letter to you as your legal advisor explaining why you need a great level of discipline in the fire service. I am then going to go on to talk about your court case for the offence that has been put upon you.

  1. The Difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law

    If you have a civil law problem, you have to take action yourself if you want to get a legal remedy. You can hire a private lawyer, and you will have to pay the expenses of pursuing the matter. For example, if you hire someone to paint your house and

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    The researchers in this project have tried to study this concept of tort law both from an analytical aspect as well as by citing various cases. CHAPTER 1 It is an old tradition. Plato, Aristotle and St. Paul all insisted on the inability of the letter of the law to exhaust the full content of its spirit.

  1. Consumer Protection Act 1987 This act states that the sellers are liable to any ...

    Another example could be that a gel a customer bought was charged �3.50 but the gel does not even stick up hair for example or used for any of the indeed uses, then the gel has a unsatisfactory quality. Tesco are in way breaching the law, so Tesco could be

  2. "Discuss the meaning and constitutional significance of the rule of law. Illustrate your answer ...

    The king or the head of the state in other countries are immune from both criminal and civil action; judges are immune from personal responsibility for their official acts even if they might have acted beyond their jurisdiction but not knowingly.

  1. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    Any accused person who did not come to court was 'Outlawed'. This meant he no longer had the protection of the law and could be killed by anyone as a punishment. Prisons were only used for holding accused people before trial.

  2. Distinguishing between a Lay Magistrate and a Stipendiary Magistrate.

    The clerk always on hand to give them legal advice if the lay magistrate needs it. Criticism has been made in the past that lay magistrates have a lack of understanding of the law because they are not qualified in law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work