• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Role of Ratio Decidendi in Judicial Precedent.

Extracts from this document...


The Role of Ratio Decidendi in Judicial Precedent Ratio decidendi plays a very important role in judicial precedent as it is the legal principle underlying the decision in a particular case. Therefore, it creates the precedent for future cases and is considered the most important part of a judge's speech. Judicial precedent, which is case law, has been and still is a major source of law in the English system. The decisions from previous cases create law for future judges to follow. The English law system is based on the Latin principle of stare decisis, which means 'stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established,' i.e. ...read more.


The case was about a 250m high tower that Hunter said caused interference with television reception. A decision needed to be made as to whether the tower did cause problems, but because this was an unusual case the judge didn't have a directly related ratio decidendi to refer to and so he found a case with a similarity. The judge found a case from 1611 and came to the judgment that interference with television broadcasts was analogous to blocking a view out of a window. He also said that television wasn't a necessity and so ruled that Canary Wharf Ltd weren't liable. Binding precedent is where a judge is forced to follow a decision even if he/she doesn't agree with it. ...read more.


R v R in 1991 * Decision were made by the judicial committee of the Privy Council * Statements were made in an obiter dicta * There has been a dissenting judgement The obiter dicta is another principle of law. Basically it is just the other things said by the judge. Sometimes it is difficult separating the ratio decidendi from the obiter dicta as they are written in continuous prose. Also it is sometimes hard to make a judgment because there are more than one ratio decidendi. Overall I think the role of ratio decidendi in judicial precedent is a significant one. It helps guide judges to give consistent judgments; it also helps prevent appeals for injustice. The ratio decidendi offers direction if a judge doesn't want to exactly follow the decision from a previous case. Rajveer Khera - Law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    Beamish where the precedent, R v. Millis had to be followed. Even though at times the Law Lords of the highest court of the land were very reluctant, they did not have the discretion to do otherwise. The Practice Statement established the House of Lords to have the discretion to

  2. Marked by a teacher

    What is judicial precedent?

    3 star(s)

    This aspect of formal justice is important in justifying the decisions taken in particular cases. Besides the advantages, there are disadvantages for judicial precedent too. It creates uncertainty because the doctrine of stare decisis is undermined by absolute number of cases that have been reported.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    In Young V Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd (1944) the court of appeal stated that the civil division is bound by its own decisions but that there were three exceptions to this, i.e. in the following situations the civil division could depart from its own previous decisions (Where there are conflicting Court of Appeal decisions the Court of Appeal

  2. The Role of the ICJ

    Resource Efficiency * As international trials can take a large amount of time juries and judges need to make the trials efficient and also fair. * Time in the courts can be wasted in regards to false allegations. Also compensation claims for false imprisonment may be issued - thus wasting time and money.

  1. Describe how the system of judicial precedent operates

    least 5 years in any of the following since the age of 13 either: The United Kingdom, Isle of Man or The Channel Islands; and finally one must be a registered elector on either the Parliamentary or Local Government register.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    A material alteration in the pronote debars the person from recovering the amount of the pronote on the basis of original contract. Suresh Chandra v. Satish Chandra, 1983 All. 81 11. Discharge by payment of altered instrument: Where an instrument has been materially altered but does not appear to have

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work