• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The rule of law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1688 were attempts made by people of the time to enforce the rule of law in Britain. The rule of law is a set of values or principles that are the cornerstone of our legal system. These principles are known or readily discoverable and therefore do not change without notice; are reasonably clear; apply prospectively, not retroactively; and enforced through public trials based upon rational procedural rules before arbiters independent of the state and all others. The purpose of the rule of law is to remove both the reality of injustice and the sense of injustice, thus preventing individuals from taking the law into their own hands as would occur under natural law or anarchy. The rule of law advocates that no one, not even Kings, politicians, government officials etc... are above the law. During the medieval period a transition took place in Britain that moved the feudal belief that the King was subject to law to the King being above the law. ...read more.

Middle

The Glorious Revolution was the result of a series of kings doing as they pleased against the rule of law. Clarke states: "In the sixteenth century in England the constitutional practice emerged that major changes in national policy were made by acts of parliament. In the early seventeenth century when King James I and his successors sought to rule by the prerogative and in particular to raise taxes by extra-parliamentary means, a conflict ensued with parliamentary forces and some sections of the judiciary." Following the revolution, the current monarch was replaced by Dutch protestant King William of Orange on the condition that he agree to the Bill of Rights 1688. The Bill of Rights imposed far greater restrictions upon the monarch then the Magna Carta had, and introduced many concepts considered part of the rule of law. Some examples of this are: Art1,2 which prevented the monarch from suspending or dispensing with the law and executing laws; Art10 disallowed excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. ...read more.

Conclusion

In relation to this case, Wade and Bradley state: "Such decisions stressed the value of personal liberty, and the necessity of protecting private property against official interference. At the same time, the remedy of habeas corpus was being developed. Formal adherence to the law was one of the public values of 18th century Britain, though not all the people gained equally from it." Thus the case of Entick v. Carrington set a precedent whereby the rule of law prevailed except where statute said otherwise. In conclusion, the rule of law safeguards liberty for citizens against arbitrary use of power by the government. The Magna Carta was a barely enforceable document but put the rule of law out in the open for all to see, and the Bill of Rights giving further power towards enforcing the rule of law. Although the Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1688 may not have enforced the rule of law fully, they were indeed a step in the right direction. Kylie Willis SN: 04439554 LWB42 Law, Society and Justice Week 5 Self directed tutorial exercise 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    (Flexibility - i.e. a general Ratio Decidendii can be extended to various fact situations e.g. the test for negligence in Donohue V Stevenson relating to the reliability of the manufacturer of ginger beer has now been extended to every claim in negligence.

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    Broadly stated, their case was that the respondents initially stopped them from selling the flour and subsequently imposed restriction on its sale, "which effectively prevented the sale". Loss was caused to them on account of delay in sale due to their intervention.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Conclusion to OAPA 1861 s20 1. Trial either way offence with a maximum penalty of 5 years 2. AR to s20 is serious harm which includes: - * Wounding * Inflicting * Serious physiological harm 3. Both s20 and s47 carry the same penalty, but have different MR. and AR.

  2. LAW OF TORTS II

    The Ipp Report introduced this concern in the Introduction by explaining that: "In recent times it has become too easy for plaintiffs in personal injury cases to establish liability for negligence on the part of defendents."7 Subsequent to this was a notion that in such cases damages awards were too

  1. Free essay

    Explain how the narrow rule stated in Donoghue v Stevenson has been developed.

    It states: if a cup strucks hard surface it may result in an injury. Standard of safety is defined by what the society in general is entitled to expect in comparison to what they actually expect. Another interesting case concerning general knowledge has been brought against McDonalds Restaurant in Pelman v.

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Even in its American infancy, patent law has always been important, important enough to be revised three years after its inception. To quote the Patent and Trademark Office website, "A U.S. patent for an invention is the grant of a property right to the inventor(s), issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Mode in which notice may be given (Section 94): 1. Notice may be oral or in writing, but it must be an actual, formal notification. A letter merely demanding payment is not sufficient. It may be given in person, or through a messenger, or by post.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    That is, the western rhetoric of proximity troped the familiarity of Islam in these latter eras not to mute the threat of the new religion to Europe, but to intensify it, to increase rather than reduce the "pressure" it created upon the occidental mind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work