• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury selection provide a solution?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury selection provide a solution? The theory behind the UK system of random selection is based on many assumptions. Firstly that randomness produces a representative sample of the population, which will provide verdicts, representative of the general public. It is assumed that if one juror has an apparent prejudice, then those in other jurors will counter it and so bias does not occur in this system1. Another assumption is that having "12 good men and true"2 randomly selected into the jury "strengthens the legitimacy of the legal system."3 However, it is clear that randomness does not provide representativeness and not all jurors are good and true. By implication a random sample can be all white, all black, all Asian, all young, all Liberals or all members of the BNP4 and so not representative of the population. Penny Darbyshire wrote an article in 19915 stating that instead of being representative, the jury was actually "an anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard legislator, whose erratic and secret decisions run counter to the rule of law"6 and by overlooking the law in an attempt to gain justice, innocent people may end up being convicted. ...read more.


Studies conducted on the electoral register have shown it to be unrepresentative of all ethnic minorities. The Home Office, in 1999, found that 8% of people eligible to be jurors were not on the elector register. 24% of black people were also not on the electoral register and 15% of those from an Indian sub-continent were also not on there. 24% of other ethnic minority groups were also not on the electoral register.11 Therefore many juries are picked with either small amounts or no jurors from ethnic minorities in them, which may sometimes bring about a bias. Judges are also not allowed to manipulate juries by trying to move selection areas to gain a more ethnic mix and so in cases where ethnicity may be an issue the judge cannot interfere as apparently this would not be fair and would tamper with the basic ethics of random selection. In R v Ford (1989) 12, the trial judge refused to grant a racially mixed jury and the Court of Appeal sustained this view on the grounds that "Fairness is achieved by the principle of random selection"13 and that to ask for a racially mixed jury would infer that some jurors are unable to be unbiased. ...read more.


The selection of jury members could rectify these faults by manipulating who should and shouldn't be in the jury according to their attributes, which may produce a more desirable outcome, but this would be at the cost of being truly representative of the whole population. 1 White, R. C. A., The English Legal System in Action - The Administration of Justice, 3rd Edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999). 2 Slapper, G. and Kelly, D., The English Legal System, 7th Edition, (London: Cavendish, 2004). 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Darbyshire, P., Criminal Law Review (1991, Crim LR 740) as cited by Slapper, G. and Kelly, D., The English Legal System, 7th Edition, (London: Cavendish, 2004). 6 Id. 7 Supra at note 2. The defendant was charged under the Official Secrets Act 1991 and although the judge ruled that there was no valid defence the jury refused to convict him. 8 http://www.hayesfield.co.uk/law/Revision/Juries.doc 9 Lord Denning, What's Next in Law? As cited by http://www.hayesfield.co.uk/law/Revision/Juries.doc 10 Supra at note 2. 11 Ingam, T., The English Legal Process, 10th Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) p.224. 12 Supra at note 2, p.1. 13 Id. 14 Id. 15 Spencer, J. R., Jackson's Machinery of Justice, 8th Edition, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). 16 Id. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tanya Daley-Antoine 10084973 LSP1 1093 words 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an extremely well written essay. Relevant points are supported by clear and convincing evidence.
However the case against jury selection has not been considered. Perhaps a comment about the US experience, where jury selection is commonly used, would have given a balanced discussion.
Rating: *****

Marked by teacher Nick Price 04/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    Yet, in the case of R v. Simpson (2003), the Court of Appeal claims that it retains some discretion to depart from a previous decision that it considers to be wrong, particularly where there is a full Court of five judges sitting.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    The Maxwell Confait case was broadcast nationally, and this shattered the image of the police. They were no longer respected and this caused major riots etc. A change was to have to be made to repair the damage that

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    A result of a lack of obedience could mean that on a call out a police constable could feel that he or she doesn't need to listen to instructions and will then try to tackle the problem alone. Conformity is need in the police service because in some situations working

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    To illustrate this Aristotle defines a key term of his moral philosophy by reference to what the reasonable man would decide, it ho_i an ho phronimos horiseien1 The Laws of England place great weight on the Reasonable Man. They will not, and sometimes will say it is because they cannot,

  1. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    There was no police force in Saxon England. In the early Saxon kingdoms people relied on their families to help them catch thieves or other wrongdoers. By the tenth century, kings had set up a different kind of self-help system - known as a tithing.

  2. "Discuss the meaning and constitutional significance of the rule of law. Illustrate your answer ...

    The second principle of rule of law dicey says that there should be equality before law and all are amenable to ordinary courts of the land. But this principle has many exceptions because equality before law is not possible in every case.

  1. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    Many of the partners get away with the crimes because they are not reported, only around two per cent of women actually report their partners for domestic violence. There are several suggestions as to why there are low report numbers, many of the women are embarrassed due to the stigma

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Problem - Maloney used natural consequence (degree of probability) H & S said natural consequence had to be explained in degree of probability to the jury. HOL said they agree and natural consequence needs clarification Lord Scarman - Handcock & Shankland Test "The greater the probable of consequence, the more

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work