• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury selection provide a solution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury selection provide a solution? The theory behind the UK system of random selection is based on many assumptions. Firstly that randomness produces a representative sample of the population, which will provide verdicts, representative of the general public. It is assumed that if one juror has an apparent prejudice, then those in other jurors will counter it and so bias does not occur in this system1. Another assumption is that having "12 good men and true"2 randomly selected into the jury "strengthens the legitimacy of the legal system."3 However, it is clear that randomness does not provide representativeness and not all jurors are good and true. By implication a random sample can be all white, all black, all Asian, all young, all Liberals or all members of the BNP4 and so not representative of the population. Penny Darbyshire wrote an article in 19915 stating that instead of being representative, the jury was actually "an anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard legislator, whose erratic and secret decisions run counter to the rule of law"6 and by overlooking the law in an attempt to gain justice, innocent people may end up being convicted. ...read more.

Middle

Studies conducted on the electoral register have shown it to be unrepresentative of all ethnic minorities. The Home Office, in 1999, found that 8% of people eligible to be jurors were not on the elector register. 24% of black people were also not on the electoral register and 15% of those from an Indian sub-continent were also not on there. 24% of other ethnic minority groups were also not on the electoral register.11 Therefore many juries are picked with either small amounts or no jurors from ethnic minorities in them, which may sometimes bring about a bias. Judges are also not allowed to manipulate juries by trying to move selection areas to gain a more ethnic mix and so in cases where ethnicity may be an issue the judge cannot interfere as apparently this would not be fair and would tamper with the basic ethics of random selection. In R v Ford (1989) 12, the trial judge refused to grant a racially mixed jury and the Court of Appeal sustained this view on the grounds that "Fairness is achieved by the principle of random selection"13 and that to ask for a racially mixed jury would infer that some jurors are unable to be unbiased. ...read more.

Conclusion

The selection of jury members could rectify these faults by manipulating who should and shouldn't be in the jury according to their attributes, which may produce a more desirable outcome, but this would be at the cost of being truly representative of the whole population. 1 White, R. C. A., The English Legal System in Action - The Administration of Justice, 3rd Edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999). 2 Slapper, G. and Kelly, D., The English Legal System, 7th Edition, (London: Cavendish, 2004). 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Darbyshire, P., Criminal Law Review (1991, Crim LR 740) as cited by Slapper, G. and Kelly, D., The English Legal System, 7th Edition, (London: Cavendish, 2004). 6 Id. 7 Supra at note 2. The defendant was charged under the Official Secrets Act 1991 and although the judge ruled that there was no valid defence the jury refused to convict him. 8 http://www.hayesfield.co.uk/law/Revision/Juries.doc 9 Lord Denning, What's Next in Law? As cited by http://www.hayesfield.co.uk/law/Revision/Juries.doc 10 Supra at note 2. 11 Ingam, T., The English Legal Process, 10th Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) p.224. 12 Supra at note 2, p.1. 13 Id. 14 Id. 15 Spencer, J. R., Jackson's Machinery of Justice, 8th Edition, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). 16 Id. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tanya Daley-Antoine 10084973 LSP1 1093 words 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an extremely well written essay. Relevant points are supported by clear and convincing evidence.
However the case against jury selection has not been considered. Perhaps a comment about the US experience, where jury selection is commonly used, would have given a balanced discussion.
Rating: *****

Marked by teacher Nick Price 04/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    A result of a lack of obedience could mean that on a call out a police constable could feel that he or she doesn't need to listen to instructions and will then try to tackle the problem alone. Conformity is need in the police service because in some situations working

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    specify exactly what ought to be done in all circumstances, and will phrase their demands instead in terms of what a reasonable man would in the circumstances do. Importance of Reasonable Man in Common Law The Common Law of England has been laboriously built about a mythical figure-the figure of 'The Reasonable Man'.

  1. Consumer Protection Act 1987 This act states that the sellers are liable to any ...

    So for example, if Tesco sell a product which is unsafe as it has sharp edges coming out of the packaging for example, then Tesco are breaking the law. Another example could be that Tesco sell a toy which has some of its edges of its packaging sharp and it

  2. "The law is impartial and exists to protect the rights of individuals and society ...

    Cases of injustice, when people are falsely accused and sent to prison for a crime that they were not guilty of, is constantly in the tabloids and media. This evokes a negative view of our law system. Courts are independent and exist to defend the values of society against law breakers.

  1. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    There was no police force in Saxon England. In the early Saxon kingdoms people relied on their families to help them catch thieves or other wrongdoers. By the tenth century, kings had set up a different kind of self-help system - known as a tithing.

  2. essay discussing the advantages and disadvanteges of lay magistrates

    One example of this could be excessively going over the speed limit This means that often little knowledge is needed into the law side of things and so there is no need to use professionals, as all they have to do is decide the punishment They can also deal with triable either way offences.

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    as woman, and as heretic--and that the lawyer repeatedly performs a reductive rhetorical maneuver in order to induce Christian fraternity among the pilgrims. In locating orientalism at the heart of the Man of Law's treatment of the Muslim, I must take issue with such critics as Morton W.

  2. To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

    Consequently, the Land Register seeks to provide a complete picture of land ownership in England and Wales and do away with the need to repeatedly examine title deeds on successive sales. The two systems are mutually exclusive; land either falls into one system or the other, but never at the same time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work