• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

LLB(HONS) LAW LAND ASSIGNMENT 2000/2001 To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met? The aims of the extensive restructuring of English property law that took place in 1925 can be accurately summarised by Lord Upjohn1: "it has been the policy of the law for over a hundred years to simplify and facilitate transactions in real property. It is of great importance that persons should be able freely and easily to raise money on the security of their tenure." Prior to 1925, the system for the transfer of land remained complex and haphazard. The legislation of 1925 sought to rectify this by several means, the most notable of which was the expansion of the registered land system. The need for a comprehensive register of title to land had long been the primary ambition of law reformers. This is plainly evident in a 1857 Royal Commission2 which wanted land owners "to deal with land in as simple and easy a manner, as far as title is concerned..." The realisation of this goal depended ultimately upon a definitive record of the rights and obligations relating to all land in England and Wales3. Consequently, the Land Registry Act (1862) introduced an early system of Land Registration. However, the system proved unworkable and an entirely new system was established by the Land Transfer Acts of 1875 and 18974. While it is true that the aims of the Royal Commission have never been fully met by the Land Registration Act (1925), the Act (and subsequent Acts) ...read more.

Middle

The implication is, therefore, that there are two parallel regimes of land law that continue to operate in this country. It may well be argued that this undermines the aims of land registration but it is, however, equally important to its success. In 1987, the Law Commission readily accepted that "there are substantive differences between the two systems", but they went on to say that land registration "is ... the way forward, the new improving the old." This surrender to the inevitable is significant because a successful system of land registration depends ultimately upon addressing the failings of the old system. Consequently, this has paved the way for the introduction of computerisation and 'e-conveyancing' which would not have been possible within the unregistered land system. Under s123 of the LRA (1925), an application for registration must be made to register the title within two months of the date of transfer18; failure to register the land renders the purchaser's title void. If on examination the land can be found to have satisfactory title, certain information relating to the land is entered into a 'register'. The register for each piece of land is actually divided into three separate registers: the property register, the proprietorship register and the charges register. The property register contains a description of the property by reference to a plan and also details any rights to which the land has benefit19. The proprietorship register provides the name and address of the landowner and details of any limitations on the powers of dealing with the land. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Law Commission proves to be a useful gauge as to whether the aims of the registered system have been met. The Commission has been successful in its endeavors to reform the system given that three Land Registration Acts43 enact Law Commission reports. Furthermore, the Commission is at the very forefront of recommending reformation of the 1925 Act and they clearly feel that the present system necessitates this level of attention44. According to the Commission, the Land Registry 'has coped well with the defects in legislation and has made the system work despite it rather than because of it.'45 It is reasonable to assume, therefore, that the time has now come for an extensive overhaul of the LRA 1925 and it is likely that forthcoming and long awaited legislation will significantly amend the 1925 Act. This need for reform is heightened by the desire for a system of electronic conveyancing. It is, however, worth bearing in mind that the concept of an absolutely comprehensive register is probably unattainable given that it is impossible to register some rights (for example, squatter's rights). Furthermore, it is impracticable to register others (for example, short tenancies and local land charges). Bibliography Chappelle, Land Law (2001), Longman Gray K & Gray S F, Elements of Land Law 3rd Ed, (2001), Butterworths Perrins B, Understanding Land Law 3rd Ed (2000), Cavendish Publishing Ltd. Riddall J G, Land Law 6th Ed, (1997) Butterworths Mackenzie J & Phillips M, A Practical Approach to Land Law 7th Ed (1997), Blackstone Press Ltd. Dalton P J, Land Law (1996), Pitman Publishing Dixon M, Lecture Notes ... Land Law (1994), Cavendish Publishing Ltd. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    It is also seen that there is a presumption of a resulting trust where there is a transfer into the name of another alone.14 In Seldon v Davidson15, it was also held that where A pays money to B in circumstances where there is no presumption of advancement, the transaction is presumed to be a loan.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    This can be done without the person's consent and carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect. A registered medical practitioner or nurse can take intimate samples, such as blood, semen and body tissue or fluids.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    offence, * anyone who is in the act of committing an arrestable offence, * anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be committing such an offence, * anyone whom he had reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of it.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NATIVE TITLE

    3 star(s)

    The indigenous people attempted to resolve the disaster the European invasion caused by asking for a treaty, however their wishes were not recognised. The aboriginals were not recognised as land owners until the High Court decision of the Mabo case in 1992, which was closely followed by the adoption of the Native Title Act 1993.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Conclusion to OAPA 1861 s20 1. Trial either way offence with a maximum penalty of 5 years 2. AR to s20 is serious harm which includes: - * Wounding * Inflicting * Serious physiological harm 3. Both s20 and s47 carry the same penalty, but have different MR. and AR.

  2. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    consent from the external body16, it was therefore held to be incomplete. Comparing this to Re Rose17, where Rose had done everything in his power to transfer the legal and equitable interest but the factors which delayed the registration of the legal title were beyond his control.

  1. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    On the other hand there have been considerable restrictions on the objects, which are not for the advancement of religion such as the Theosophical Society34, South Place Ethical Society35 or the Church of Scientology36. This shows that the law of charity is evolving with social changes, as per Lord Wilberforce.

  2. Describe the main differences between solicitors and barristers with regard to training and work ...

    there was a breach of that duty of care and that breached caused foreseeable damage. As barristers did not owe this duty of care to their client, this gave barristers immunity from being sued for negligence. They had felt that clients who are unhappy with their verdict may all try to blame the barrister, and not the evidence involved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work