• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious? Between AD500 and 1100 England changed form being a mass of small kingdoms into one united country. During these centuries, kings played a vital part in every aspect of government and especially in crime and punishment. A king's most important tasks were to defend his country from attacks and to make sure his laws were obeyed. Laws were made by kings after consulting nobles and bishops. At first, Laws had two main aims, to protect landowners' property from damage or theft and to protect people from violence although freemen got more protection than slaves. Early Saxon kings allowed the victims of crimes to punish the criminal themselves. If someone was murdered, the family had the right to track down and kill the murderer. This right was known as the 'Blood Feud'. There were two problems about this legal violence. Firstly, it often led to even more violence as families and their friends banded together to take revenge for an attack and then this led to another attack. Secondly, it did not protect people who did not want to use violence against those who had harmed them. ...read more.

Middle

In a modern trial there are lawyers to prosecute and defend, and jury members must have no prior knowledge of the accused. By contrast, at a Saxon trial there were no lawyers to prosecute or defend the accused person. The accuser was the person who claimed to be the victim of the crime. The jury was also different. It was made up of men from the area who probably knew the accuser and the accused. Both the accused and the accuser told their version of events to the jury. It was then up to the jury to decide who was telling the truth. If there was no clear evidence (such as a witness having seen the crime take place) they used their experience of people concerned. If the jury felt the accuser was more honest in general than the accused, they swore an oath that the accused was guilty. The jury's oath taking was called Compurgation. There were times when the jury members could not agree with each other. This was usually in cases of theft or murder when there was no witness. Trial by ordeal was the solution to this problem. ...read more.

Conclusion

on the end of a rope. The rope was knotted above the waist. If the person sank and the knot went below the surface then he was innocent because the 'pure' water had been willing to let this innocent beneath its surface. However, if he and the knot floated then they believed the water was rejecting him because he was guilty. Trial by consecrated bread was taken by priests. The priest first had to pray, asking that he be choked by the bread if he lied. Then he had to eat a piece of consecrated bread. If he choked then he was guilty because God would not let a sinner eat consecrated bread. This might seem a much more lenient ordeal but people believed that God was sure to punish a priest who lied and so it was seen as the most effective or all ordeals. I think that the Saxons used trial by ordeal as a means of finding out whether someone was guilty or not to deter other would be criminals from committing crime. In my opinion, Saxon trials were based on superstition rather than logic because the trials in order to ascertain whether the person was guilty were based on a chance result and were often biased of finding them guilty. 1,257 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    No change in the present statutory criteria for qualification for jury service, save as to registration, as distinct from entitlement to registration, on an electoral roll; and amendment of the law to substitute for the condition of registration on an electoral roll, inclusion in such a roll and/or on any

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    As the lesser offence is involuntary manslaughter (basic intent) involuntary manslaughter becomes the final outcome of the defence Same with s18 GBH --> s20 GBH The impact on theft Theft, robbery, and burglary are all specific intention crimes. Once the crime is dropped to s1 theft there is no lesser

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    The bible also requires the death sentence for a wide variety of crimes, including practicing evil sorcery, adultery, homosexual behavior, doing work on Saturday and murder. It even calls for some criminals (e.g. prostitutes who are the daughter of priests)

  2. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    Enforceability is vital for a law to be effective in achieving justice otherwise it is disputed. The use of negotiation has been tried in jurisdictions in relation to the juvenile crime and it has been successful. Enforcing laws is costly therefore it is vital that money and resources are used efficiently.

  1. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    Possible alternatives to the current system. There are a number of alternative methods to trial by jury. For instance; Trial by a single judge only. The advantages of this method are it is cheaper than a trial by jury, because no expenses would be needed for the jury, it reduces

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    necessarily have impeded the Man of Law's orientalist project, for any number of medieval religious authorities chose to ignore canon law and present Islam as a heresy. I shall further argue that the lawyer constructs woman's otherness on the same model and that his invention bears fruit in the Epilogue,

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Merely availing of services rendered by the banker, i.e., encashing a check, remitting money through a bank draft or depositing valuables in the safe deposit vaults in the bank, do not create the relationship of banker and customer. Checks A check is a special type of draft that is drawn

  2. On 5th May, 1920, Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested and interviewed about the ...

    You have no idea how many people were brought to identify us by Bowles and others. I remember in the crowd a Chinaman, Japanese, Salvation Army people, Negroes, and people of every kind and class, even children. Even suppose that only a third of them came from Bridgewater.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work