• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious? Between AD500 and 1100 England changed form being a mass of small kingdoms into one united country. During these centuries, kings played a vital part in every aspect of government and especially in crime and punishment. A king's most important tasks were to defend his country from attacks and to make sure his laws were obeyed. Laws were made by kings after consulting nobles and bishops. At first, Laws had two main aims, to protect landowners' property from damage or theft and to protect people from violence although freemen got more protection than slaves. Early Saxon kings allowed the victims of crimes to punish the criminal themselves. If someone was murdered, the family had the right to track down and kill the murderer. This right was known as the 'Blood Feud'. There were two problems about this legal violence. Firstly, it often led to even more violence as families and their friends banded together to take revenge for an attack and then this led to another attack. Secondly, it did not protect people who did not want to use violence against those who had harmed them. ...read more.

Middle

In a modern trial there are lawyers to prosecute and defend, and jury members must have no prior knowledge of the accused. By contrast, at a Saxon trial there were no lawyers to prosecute or defend the accused person. The accuser was the person who claimed to be the victim of the crime. The jury was also different. It was made up of men from the area who probably knew the accuser and the accused. Both the accused and the accuser told their version of events to the jury. It was then up to the jury to decide who was telling the truth. If there was no clear evidence (such as a witness having seen the crime take place) they used their experience of people concerned. If the jury felt the accuser was more honest in general than the accused, they swore an oath that the accused was guilty. The jury's oath taking was called Compurgation. There were times when the jury members could not agree with each other. This was usually in cases of theft or murder when there was no witness. Trial by ordeal was the solution to this problem. ...read more.

Conclusion

on the end of a rope. The rope was knotted above the waist. If the person sank and the knot went below the surface then he was innocent because the 'pure' water had been willing to let this innocent beneath its surface. However, if he and the knot floated then they believed the water was rejecting him because he was guilty. Trial by consecrated bread was taken by priests. The priest first had to pray, asking that he be choked by the bread if he lied. Then he had to eat a piece of consecrated bread. If he choked then he was guilty because God would not let a sinner eat consecrated bread. This might seem a much more lenient ordeal but people believed that God was sure to punish a priest who lied and so it was seen as the most effective or all ordeals. I think that the Saxons used trial by ordeal as a means of finding out whether someone was guilty or not to deter other would be criminals from committing crime. In my opinion, Saxon trials were based on superstition rather than logic because the trials in order to ascertain whether the person was guilty were based on a chance result and were often biased of finding them guilty. 1,257 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    Some of the recommendations from the Auld report could help in this area. A review of the amounts of allowances payable to jurors for their attendance at court; and consideration of an additional allowance to cover the cost to potential jurors who, but for it, could justifiably claim excusal because of caring responsibilities.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Case law on consent An examination of case law would suggest that under English law at the eminent the defence of consent only extends to common battery even when there is good evidence of consent between consenting adults the courts appear to be unwilling to accept it.

  1. The Constitutionalisation of the Treaties by the European Court of Justice.

    Thus a unique interpretative practice has enabled the Court to attribute to the Treaty qualities analogous to that of a constitution which it was never expressed to have. This was the first step in the 'constitutionalisation' of the Treaty. It is instructive to note at this stage that this first step in constitutionalisation was in fact a tentative one.

  2. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    Under the children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) the court is required to be guided by certain principles. These are that children have both rights and freedom before the law as well as the right to be heard, should be given education and employment as procedures for correction, stay in

  1. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    A probation representative may be asked to prepare a pre sentencing report for the court if the defendant is convicted. This report includes weather the probation service feels that the defendant is eligible for a community based sentence. They also supervise some of the penalties.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    bank's refusal to honor checks on an overdrawn account is a wrongful dishonor. Relevant Case KENDALL YACHT CORP. v. UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK Court of Appeal of California, 1975. 50 Cal.App.3d 949,123 Cal.Rptr. 848. Backgrounds and Facts: Lawrence and Linda Kendall were officers and principal shareholders of Kendall Yacht Corporation.

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    And the reason the virago evoked such cultural scorn was because, as Gavin Douglas phrased it, she transgressed traditional gender roles by "exersand a mannis office." The virago became a standard monitory topos of later medieval antifeminist satire and discourse.

  2. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    Some people believe that it is not just to terminate one's life before their death time as it will be considered "playing God". Such people often believe that human beings were sent onto Earth by God for a specific purpose and by killing them prematurely, we are going against God's wishes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work