• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the criticisms of the current law on Voluntary manslaughter?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the criticisms of the current law on Voluntary manslaughter? Voluntary Manslaughter, set out in the Homicide Act 1957, was established as a substitution for murder in certain circumstances. If there is evidence of Diminished responsibility then murder may be substituted for manslaughter. Diminished responsibility can be a form of insanity an 'abnormailty of mind' which is somewhat advantageous if you can prove this, as would be evidence of Provocation, Infanticide or the participation of a Suicide Pact. If the defendant is convicted of Murder, there is a mandatory life sentence and will definitely be imprisoned for a term usually no less than 12 years. However, if convicted of Voluntary Manslaughter, which still embeds the Actus Reus and Mens Rea of Murder, 'malice aforethought', and the defendant may be sentenced at the discretion of the Judge. In some cases this has amounted to a full life sentence anyway, but there have also been a few where the defendant has been given a suspended sentence. Aside from this fact, is the current law on voluntary manslaughter satisfactory or is it too readily available as a defence against Murder, making the law too forgiving of serious crime? ...read more.

Middle

In Johnson 1989 the defendant made uncivil comments to the victim who then in return threatened the defendant with a glass bottle and Johnson then stabbed the victim with a flick-knife. The Court of Appeal allowed Voluntary Manslaughter, however at the first hearing of this trial the jury had disagreed because the Provocation was brought about by the defendant. Some people feel that self-induced provocation is very unfair, the defendants actions however will be looked upon by the judge as an aggravating factor and it is unlikely that they will get a greatly reduced sentence. Again more problems arose with one of the elements of Provocation to Voluntary Manslaughter and that was that 'a sudden loss of control' needs to be exercised. The problem with cases like Alhuwalia 1992 and Humphreys 1995, is that there was no 'sudden and temporary loss of control'. What is now considered and accepted by the current law is the 'slow burn' principle of Battered Woman's Syndrome. But there is no way to establish when exactly the line burns out or to what extent women's self control differs from men's. ...read more.

Conclusion

The criticisms that I personally raise on the current law of Voluntary manslaughter are that it doesn't help those that it always should. For example the policy on Diminished Responsibility is that this has to be ''abnormality of mind' not caused by drugs or alcohol. However what about those on prescription drugs such as O'Connell 1997. Should there not be a provision for these people or those who have been deceived and taken drugs or alcohol unknowingly? Also, a topic that should be considered is that when it comes to Voluntary Manslaughter it can be easy to be overcome by legal technicalities and to forget that it is there to prevent injustice. In Martin 2001 there have been comments that Martin Misused the law as he claimed that in protecting his property from burglars he shot them because of his 'Paranoid personality Disorder' this seems to have gone too far and that the courts may begin to disagree once more. Roe, Diana. Criminal Law, 2000, Hodder & Stoughton Roe, Diana, Criminal Law 2nd edition, 2002, Hodder and Stoughton Nutcases Criminal Law 2nd edition, 1999, Sweet and Maxwell www.ilearnatlewes.co.uk/LawWithFrames/Module4/module4_index.htm www.sprocket1.demon.co.uk/wendyhomepage/conclusion.html - By Wendy Hesketh www.lawcom.gov.uk www.stbrn.ac.uk ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    When the question what knowledge of facts and circumstances surrounding him must the defendant have, he will not be excused for failing to observe what a reasonable man would have observed. In the Mersey Docks Trustees v Gibbs13, a dock authority who did not know but ought to have known that he dock was unsafe was negligent.

  2. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    Many of the partners get away with the crimes because they are not reported, only around two per cent of women actually report their partners for domestic violence. There are several suggestions as to why there are low report numbers, many of the women are embarrassed due to the stigma

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Recap Unlawful Act Involuntary manslaughter (UAIM) You can't be charged with voluntary manslaughter. In voluntary manslaughter it is the next step down from a murder charge. 4 tests of GOODFELLOW 1. Has the defendant got the necessary MR? For involuntary manslaughter the MR is intention or recklessness (section 47 - subjective recklessness)

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    Co-director, Policy Research Bureau There is no other legal or social arena where we give children complete responsibility at 10, mostly for good reason. The important thing is the consequence of being over the age of criminal responsibility, not the age per se.

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    asexually, and then the Plant Variety Act which started to protect other forms of plants, but never touched on bacteria or other living things. Besides bio technical patent cases there are cases involving tools as simple as pliers. For example, in the recent case of Intirtool, Ltd.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    case retried before a new jury; if two juries fail to agree, the prosecution does not usually offer any evidence at the third trial, so that the defendant is formally acquitted. Occasionally, if the jury convict on the main charge but disagree on a lesser one (or if the counts

  1. Law of Homicide

    The mens rea in this case was that the husband had intention to kill or cause grievously bodily harm to some one, because he planted a bomb in his car prior to her driving it. The bomb consisted of two sections of metal pipe, threaded with a detonator.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    98 (b)] 3. When the party charged could not suffer damage for want of notice, e.g., if at the time when the instrument is drawn there were no funds belonging to the drawer in the hands of the drawee, the drawer suffers no damage, and is not entitled to notice of dishonor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work