• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the criticisms of the current law on Voluntary manslaughter?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the criticisms of the current law on Voluntary manslaughter? Voluntary Manslaughter, set out in the Homicide Act 1957, was established as a substitution for murder in certain circumstances. If there is evidence of Diminished responsibility then murder may be substituted for manslaughter. Diminished responsibility can be a form of insanity an 'abnormailty of mind' which is somewhat advantageous if you can prove this, as would be evidence of Provocation, Infanticide or the participation of a Suicide Pact. If the defendant is convicted of Murder, there is a mandatory life sentence and will definitely be imprisoned for a term usually no less than 12 years. However, if convicted of Voluntary Manslaughter, which still embeds the Actus Reus and Mens Rea of Murder, 'malice aforethought', and the defendant may be sentenced at the discretion of the Judge. In some cases this has amounted to a full life sentence anyway, but there have also been a few where the defendant has been given a suspended sentence. Aside from this fact, is the current law on voluntary manslaughter satisfactory or is it too readily available as a defence against Murder, making the law too forgiving of serious crime? ...read more.

Middle

In Johnson 1989 the defendant made uncivil comments to the victim who then in return threatened the defendant with a glass bottle and Johnson then stabbed the victim with a flick-knife. The Court of Appeal allowed Voluntary Manslaughter, however at the first hearing of this trial the jury had disagreed because the Provocation was brought about by the defendant. Some people feel that self-induced provocation is very unfair, the defendants actions however will be looked upon by the judge as an aggravating factor and it is unlikely that they will get a greatly reduced sentence. Again more problems arose with one of the elements of Provocation to Voluntary Manslaughter and that was that 'a sudden loss of control' needs to be exercised. The problem with cases like Alhuwalia 1992 and Humphreys 1995, is that there was no 'sudden and temporary loss of control'. What is now considered and accepted by the current law is the 'slow burn' principle of Battered Woman's Syndrome. But there is no way to establish when exactly the line burns out or to what extent women's self control differs from men's. ...read more.

Conclusion

The criticisms that I personally raise on the current law of Voluntary manslaughter are that it doesn't help those that it always should. For example the policy on Diminished Responsibility is that this has to be ''abnormality of mind' not caused by drugs or alcohol. However what about those on prescription drugs such as O'Connell 1997. Should there not be a provision for these people or those who have been deceived and taken drugs or alcohol unknowingly? Also, a topic that should be considered is that when it comes to Voluntary Manslaughter it can be easy to be overcome by legal technicalities and to forget that it is there to prevent injustice. In Martin 2001 there have been comments that Martin Misused the law as he claimed that in protecting his property from burglars he shot them because of his 'Paranoid personality Disorder' this seems to have gone too far and that the courts may begin to disagree once more. Roe, Diana. Criminal Law, 2000, Hodder & Stoughton Roe, Diana, Criminal Law 2nd edition, 2002, Hodder and Stoughton Nutcases Criminal Law 2nd edition, 1999, Sweet and Maxwell www.ilearnatlewes.co.uk/LawWithFrames/Module4/module4_index.htm www.sprocket1.demon.co.uk/wendyhomepage/conclusion.html - By Wendy Hesketh www.lawcom.gov.uk www.stbrn.ac.uk ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    Many of the partners get away with the crimes because they are not reported, only around two per cent of women actually report their partners for domestic violence. There are several suggestions as to why there are low report numbers, many of the women are embarrassed due to the stigma

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    year old woman was guilty of contributory negligence in crossing a road one had to consider a woman of her age, not a hypothetical reasonable man. In Roberts v Ramsbottom6 the defendant suffered a slight stroke just before getting into his car.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Lamb 1967 no MR therefore no prosecution 2. Unlawful = Criminal Oldest case Franklin. More recent Cato 1976 and Dalby 1982. the most recent Kennedy 1998 3. Dangerous criminal act Church 1966, the judge directed jury to apply an objective test as to what was dangerous.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    The Committee on the Rights of the Child has said that 10 is too young for criminal responsibility. If our aim is rehabilitation, it is best done under the civil system, not the criminal justice system. Verdict: Yes, to 14 Lyn Costello Mothers Against Murder and Aggression Children of 10 know the difference between right and wrong.

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Intirtool simply tried to get around the decision by claiming that the court was misinterpreting the description and stating that "punching and connecting" are just "benefits and features" which should not need to be included in patent descriptions. Also, the courts prosecuted Intirtool with attempting to mislead the patent examiner

  2. Law in association with the criminalisation of certain drugs.

    16 The media is also inextricably linked to the politicians and the public, and are utilised by the public as a vehicle of expression. The media, according to Elliot and Chapman, reinforce the idea that drug use is a problem of individual morality and that drugs threaten the values of

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    case retried before a new jury; if two juries fail to agree, the prosecution does not usually offer any evidence at the third trial, so that the defendant is formally acquitted. Occasionally, if the jury convict on the main charge but disagree on a lesser one (or if the counts

  2. Law of Homicide

    The mens rea in this case was that the husband had intention to kill or cause grievously bodily harm to some one, because he planted a bomb in his car prior to her driving it. The bomb consisted of two sections of metal pipe, threaded with a detonator.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work