• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

Extracts from this document...


'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?' The law of defamation exists to protect both the moral and professional reputation of the individual from unjustified attacks. The law tries to strike a balance between freedom of speech and a free press with the protection of an individual's reputation. Should journalists face defamation cases there are defences available. Justification is one of these defences, to use this defence the journalist must prove that what they have written is substantially true. Before the defamation act of 1952 was passed, to succeed with a defence of justification you had to prove the exact truth of every defamatory statement made in the article in question. But now under section 5 of the act, the law states that the defence will not fail merely because the article contains some minor inaccuracies. However difficulties still arise as it is not the task of the claimant to show the article is untrue, but the task of the defendant ie. The journalist to prove the words written are true. The name 'justification' is misleading because the defendant does not need to show he had a moral or social reason for publishing the words, the fact they are true is satisfactory. The journalist has to prove the article in question is 'on balance of probabilities' which is a lower requirement than 'beyond reasonable doubt'. ...read more.


Journalists do however have absolute privilege in judicial proceedings but under section 14 of the defamation act 1996 absolute privilege can only be used as a defence if the report is fair, accurate and published contemporaneously. There are many mistakes journalists can make which will forfeit their defence of absolute privilege, eg. Wrongly reporting what was said in court. Monthly magazines and even weekly newspapers sometimes have difficulty with contemporaneous reports as they often carry stories over, again this can forfeit their defence of absolute privilege. Qualified privilege offers the journalist a defence which enables them to publish matters which are thought to be in the public interest. Therefore qualified privilege will not protect an article published which is not for the benefit of the public. Like absolute privilege the report must be fair and accurate but it differs because it must be published without malice. Malice in this context means the article is written maliciously, with bad feeling towards the person. There are a number of occasions when the press want to leak a story on a persons conduct but they will be prevented because they fear defamation action being brought against them. If the information is issued by: a legislature in any member state or the European parliament; The government of any member state, or any authority performing governmental functions in any member state or part of a member state or the European Commission; an international organisation or international conference. ...read more.


[1940] 1 KB 377 The Daily Express reported that 'Harold Newstead, 30-year-old Camberwell man' had been found guilty of bigamy and sent to prison for nine months. Another Harold Newstead successfully sued the paper as he also worked in Camberwell and claimed that the article had been referred to him. In a case such as this the defendant must make a written offer to make an apology and to publish a correction in a reasonable manner. For example the correction cannot be published in small print at the back of the paper. The defendant must also pay damages. In conclusion, it is usually clear what is and what isn't defamatory but in cases where the journalist slips up there are defences available. This mean that journalists get away with a lot more than they would without the defences. They are less concerned about pushing boundaries and publishing articles which may defame people. Just by looking through the daily paper and celebrity magazines one can see a huge amount of defamatory material. Celebrities are more of a threat to journalists than those of modest means eg. A journalist may not hesitate in defaming a person on income support as there is little they could do with their limited funds. Newspapers often have to consider whether they can afford not to publish a story, a scoop on a celebrity may sell millions of papers so they stand to make money even if they are taken to court and have to pay damages. Sometimes the story is worth facing a defamation case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    R v Williams & Davies (1992) - Similar to Goodfellow but: - Williams & Davies picked up hitchhikers who believed the defendant's would rob him. The hitchhiker jumped out of the car and died. The defendant's appealed on the grounds that their actions was not aimed at the victim, but as the victims money COA decided

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    to practice shot put unsupervised failed in his action for negligence against the school authorities. The standard of care in relation to children should not be framed so as to stifle initiative. 9. Anticipation of a Reasonable man in all the varied cases relating to the standard of care there

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    the Government to exercise the functions of a Notary Public as laid down in the Negotiable Instruments Act. (Noting, Protest etc.). The term "Notary Public", includes the notary public of a foreign country also. Gujrat Singh v. Jaswant Singh3. Noting Where a note or bill is dishonored, the holder is

  2. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    Anybody that discovers an attempted suicide situation, by law, must intervene.7 The person committing suicide would not be criminalised jurisdiction recognising that those who opted to commit suicide were deserving of compassion rather than punishment. 8Jurisdiction in England believes that "individuals desperate enough to attempt suicide are unlikely to be deterred from so doing so by a legal prohibition."

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    Therefore the press as it stands can trump the duty of confidence if it can show that the publication was in the 'public interest' (again this will be discussed in detail later) From 1988 we have seen the courts in a struggle, trying to balance privacy against other prevailing rights,

  2. Tort Project 2003

    Hence my project, to reform this area of tort law in relation to the specific area of transferred malice. Malice is defined as a state of mind usually taken to be equivalent to intention or recklessness, it does not require any hostile attitude9.

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    These proposals have not yet been put into effect. At the start of the trial, a jury is empanelled and sworn. The prosecution or defence can object to a particular juror for good cause, but there is no voir dire and no peremptory challenge.

  2. Give an analysis of the case law to show the grounds upon which an ...

    Judges spend the majority of their time deciding individual cases. Those cases establish the precedents, which collectively constitute a solid proportion of our law. Nowhere is this more true than in the case of administrative law. Here the involvement of legislation has been confined to matters of procedure and practice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work