• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

Extracts from this document...


'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?' The law of defamation exists to protect both the moral and professional reputation of the individual from unjustified attacks. The law tries to strike a balance between freedom of speech and a free press with the protection of an individual's reputation. Should journalists face defamation cases there are defences available. Justification is one of these defences, to use this defence the journalist must prove that what they have written is substantially true. Before the defamation act of 1952 was passed, to succeed with a defence of justification you had to prove the exact truth of every defamatory statement made in the article in question. But now under section 5 of the act, the law states that the defence will not fail merely because the article contains some minor inaccuracies. However difficulties still arise as it is not the task of the claimant to show the article is untrue, but the task of the defendant ie. The journalist to prove the words written are true. The name 'justification' is misleading because the defendant does not need to show he had a moral or social reason for publishing the words, the fact they are true is satisfactory. The journalist has to prove the article in question is 'on balance of probabilities' which is a lower requirement than 'beyond reasonable doubt'. ...read more.


Journalists do however have absolute privilege in judicial proceedings but under section 14 of the defamation act 1996 absolute privilege can only be used as a defence if the report is fair, accurate and published contemporaneously. There are many mistakes journalists can make which will forfeit their defence of absolute privilege, eg. Wrongly reporting what was said in court. Monthly magazines and even weekly newspapers sometimes have difficulty with contemporaneous reports as they often carry stories over, again this can forfeit their defence of absolute privilege. Qualified privilege offers the journalist a defence which enables them to publish matters which are thought to be in the public interest. Therefore qualified privilege will not protect an article published which is not for the benefit of the public. Like absolute privilege the report must be fair and accurate but it differs because it must be published without malice. Malice in this context means the article is written maliciously, with bad feeling towards the person. There are a number of occasions when the press want to leak a story on a persons conduct but they will be prevented because they fear defamation action being brought against them. If the information is issued by: a legislature in any member state or the European parliament; The government of any member state, or any authority performing governmental functions in any member state or part of a member state or the European Commission; an international organisation or international conference. ...read more.


[1940] 1 KB 377 The Daily Express reported that 'Harold Newstead, 30-year-old Camberwell man' had been found guilty of bigamy and sent to prison for nine months. Another Harold Newstead successfully sued the paper as he also worked in Camberwell and claimed that the article had been referred to him. In a case such as this the defendant must make a written offer to make an apology and to publish a correction in a reasonable manner. For example the correction cannot be published in small print at the back of the paper. The defendant must also pay damages. In conclusion, it is usually clear what is and what isn't defamatory but in cases where the journalist slips up there are defences available. This mean that journalists get away with a lot more than they would without the defences. They are less concerned about pushing boundaries and publishing articles which may defame people. Just by looking through the daily paper and celebrity magazines one can see a huge amount of defamatory material. Celebrities are more of a threat to journalists than those of modest means eg. A journalist may not hesitate in defaming a person on income support as there is little they could do with their limited funds. Newspapers often have to consider whether they can afford not to publish a story, a scoop on a celebrity may sell millions of papers so they stand to make money even if they are taken to court and have to pay damages. Sometimes the story is worth facing a defamation case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    It is elementary law that someone cannot be expected to take precautions against dangers which he cannot reasonably be expected to anticipate. 10. Foreseeable acts of third parties ever where the courts are prepared to find a duty in respect of the act of third parties, It will often be

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    3. When the party primarily liable becomes insolvent, the instrument is discharged and the holder cannot make any other prior party liable thereon. Notice that in the case of insolvency, the acceptor or maker is unable to pay and it is only on refusal to pay that the instrument

  1. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    the chief reason.13 In the case of Pretty v United Kingdom, Pretty tries to overturn British euthanasia law using the Human Rights Act, Mrs Pretty's QC alleged she was facing a humiliating and degrading death which would be "distressing and undignified".

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    However, it is no surprise that of all the human rights, privacy is the most difficult to define17. It maybe perhaps, for this reason that the UK parliament has refused to recognise and define it as a separate and independent, freestanding doctrine within the legal framework.

  1. Tort Project 2003

    criminal a certain scenario would result in a crime being committed whereas in the other eye (ie) tort, this same scenario would not result in a tort being committed. A simple example of this would be if A intends to hit B with a stick that he has thrown, in

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    make their closing speeches to the jury. The judge then sums up the case for the benefit of the jury: he summarises the evidence, explains the points of law involved and the possible verdicts, and reminds them that it is up to the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

  1. Give an analysis of the case law to show the grounds upon which an ...

    Judges spend the majority of their time deciding individual cases. Those cases establish the precedents, which collectively constitute a solid proportion of our law. Nowhere is this more true than in the case of administrative law. Here the involvement of legislation has been confined to matters of procedure and practice.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    The Actus Reus of Murder Murder is the best example of a result crime. If the victim was in being at the time of the defendants actions, only result acceptable for murder is death. AG (Ref no 3) 1994 - This established time of life (taking first breath)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work