• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Law
  • Word count: 4410

What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

Extracts from this document...


Tutor-marked Assignment C 1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial? An indictable offence is an offence that may be tried on indictment, i.e.- by a jury in the Crown Court. Most serious offences i.e. murder and rape are indictable offences. A judge and jury in the Crown Court try indictable offences, and the magistrates sit only as examining justices to decide whether the prosecution has sufficient evidence to justify a trial. In a Practice Direction issued in May 1995, Lord Taylor CJ defined the four classes of offence triable on indictment as follows: > Class 1: Offences carrying the death penalty, misprision of treason, treason felony, murder, genocide, offences under s.1 of the Official Secrets Act 1911, and incitement, attempt or conspiracy to commit any of these. > Class 2: Manslaughter, infanticide, child destruction, abortion, rape, sexual intercourse or incest with a girl under 13, sedition, offences against s.1 of the Geneva Conventions Act 1957, mutiny, piracy, and incitement, attempt or conspiracy to commit any of these. > Class 3: All offences triable only on indictment except as listed in Class 1, 2 or 4. > Class 4: Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm with intent, robbery or assault with intent to rob, incitement or attempt to commit any of these, common law conspiracy, or conspiracy to commit any offence in Class 3 or 4, and all offences triable either way. Class 1 offences are normally tried by a High Court judge, Class 2 offences by a High Court judge or Circuit judge, Class 3 offences by a High Court judge, Circuit judge or Recorder, and Class 4 offences by a Circuit judge, Recorder or Assistant Recorder, though in each case there are provisions for cases to be tried by other named judges with the approval of the presiding judge of the circuit and/or the Lord Chief Justice. ...read more.


by the Unfair Terms in Contracts Regulations 1994. Directives are binding on Member States but not individuals, and cannot generally be relied upon in domestic courts. A Member State, which fails to implement, a Directive by the required date is in breach of its obligations and can be called to account by the Commission before the European Court of Justice. Where a Member State persistently fails to comply with a Directive, or with any other Community obligation, the European Court of Justice has power to impose a financial penalty. The process is a long one: > A formal letter from the Commission asking for an explanation of the breach, > A 'reasoned opinion' from the Commission rejecting the State's explanation (if any) > Proceedings before the European Court of Justice to establish liability for the breach, > A reasonable amount of time to comply with the courts decision, > A further formal letter asking for an explanation of non-compliance > A further 'reasoned opinion' and finally > A further proceeding before the European Court of Justice The amount of any penalty imposed depends on three factors: > The seriousness of the breach, including its effects on private and public interests and the urgency of the remedial action; > The Member State's ability to pay, as shown in a published table based on population and economic health; and > The duration of the infringement which is taken into account by setting the penalty at a fixed rate per day until compliance is secured. The first such penalty was imposed on Greece in July 2000; there are two other cases pending. Decisions- Decisions differ from Regulations in that they generally concern specific people or institutions rather than applying to people or institutions in an abstract sense. They can be addressed to Member States, to corporations or to individual citizens. 2. b) Examine the extent to which membership of the European Union has affected the sovereignty of Parliament, and how does the European Court of Justice seek to enforce its powers? ...read more.


as in litigation. The process is still essentially adversarial, with each side putting forwards its own arguments and evidence, there maybe oral hearings, but often the arguments are submitted in writing. An Arbitrator has discretion over the awarding of costs, but normally awards reasonable costs to the winner, The Arbitrator's decision is binding on the parties, and can be enforced as if it were a court judgement. There is no right of appeal, except to the High Court against 'serious irregularity' such as an excess of jurisdiction, a violation of natural justice, or a visible error of law. Mediation or Conciliation- Meditation is widespread in domestic disputes (e.g. divorce and custody cases), but operates in other fields too. An impartial third party acts as Mediator, not imposing any decision but encouraging the parties to discuss their differences and to reach their own agreed solution. Meditation is often much quicker than litigation and judges often encourage the parties to try Meditation before going to court as a last resort. Procedures vary, but typically there is an initial meeting at which each party puts forwards its position, followed by private meetings between the Mediator and each side in turn, followed by a second plenary meeting in which the Mediator helps the parties negotiate face-to-face. The whole process is confidential. The Mediator is a facilitator rather than a participant in the debate; the ultimate decision (which may be enforceable as an ordinary contract once it is reached) is the responsibility of the parties themselves. Conciliation is similar to mediation the main difference being that a conciliator takes a more pro-active role than a mediator. Alternative dispute resolution is preferable to ordinary court proceedings, as: > If the ordinary courts were used then there would be an increase in expense for everyone involved > Alternative dispute resolution is a lot quicker than the process of ordinary court proceedings > Cases can be decided on their individual merit as tribunals especially, are not bound by strict rules of precedent and of evidence as Courts are > Expertise can be used in particular problems Claire Spencer Page 1 09/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    The second reason for under representation of certain sections of the population is the number of people that seek to be excused or simply don't turn up for jury service. About a quarter of a million people are summoned for jury service every year.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    a doctor or nurse if they believe he is concealing something such as a weapon or drugs. Shane also must allow for fingerprints and non-intimate body samples such as saliva and hair to be taken but intimate body parts such as semen, blood etc.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Problems / Reforms to murder 1. Nedrick or Hyam? - Which is best for oblique intention? Nedrick - Virtual certainty of death or GBH - Defendant foresaw death or GBH - Jury can infer foreseeing as only evidence * This favors the defendant and is currently used Hyam - Foresight is the same as intention * This favors the prosecution and us not currently used 2.

  2. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    Both change with changes in ideas about social values." Nevertheless, both the courts and the Charity Commissioners now appear to be less prone to hold trusts concerned with international and race relations non-charitable on political grounds24. This highlights the diversity of what constitutes "educational" and Lord Hailsham dicta in McMullen is evident today.

  1. Tribunals, Arbitration, Conciliation, Mediation and Negotiation are all methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) ...

    will be acceptable to the parties involved whereas a judge is unlikely to have specialist knowledge, other than in law. Further advantages are privacy, as most forms of ADR are concluded in private so the public are unable to attend therefore this also avoids publicity from the media; and the

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    The case concerned the wedding of Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones and, like Hellewell, was concerned with unauthorised photographs. The couple had sold exclusive photo rights to OK magazine and also took precautions to make sure no other photos were taken.

  1. Pre Trial Procedure in Criminal Cases

    Must return at given date. * Police can give bail to defendant charged with offence. In this case he is bailed to appear before magistrates on a certain day. * Decision is under sec 38 of Pace by custody officer. * Bail can be refused if: name and address is thought to be false / cannot be discovered.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    have had to give notice if he had been the holder (Sec. 107). Thus, each party is entitled to a clear day for giving notice and one clear day is to be allowed for each step in the communication between parties who are liable on the instrument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work