• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is judicial precedent?

Extracts from this document...


What is judicial precedent? What are the main principles that are applied in judicial precedent? Are the different court structure being bound by the decision of others higher courts? To what extend binding precedent ensures the existence of both certainty and flexibility in common law? What are the other advantages and disadvantages that contribute to the doctrine of binding precedent? The doctrine of binding precedent or stare decisis, refers to the fact that, the decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower than its hierachy. Judicial precedent can be applied on cases and to be treated similiarly when the material facts of the cases are identical. ...read more.


Through judicial precedent, lower courts are bound by the decisions of higher courts, hence based on the statement it is accurate to say that the doctrine of binding precedent does ensures both certainty and flexibility in the common law. It creates certainty in the sense where like cases are treated alike if the material facts are identical, and this will enable the lawyers and their clients to predict what the likely outcome of a particular case through previous judicial decisions. It also creates flexibility, where this refers to the fact that judges can manipulate the common law provided, then with an opportunity to develop law in a particular areas without waiting for parliament to enact legislation. ...read more.


to any particular area may become rigid on the basis of an unjust precedent with the consequence that previous injustices are perpetuated. Other than that, judicial precedent also causes unconstitutionality. This is a fundamental question that refers to the fact that the judiciary are overstepping their role by making law rather than restricting themselves to the role of simply applying it, and if this happens than its against the declaratory theory of law claims that judges do not make law, but they simply interpret what the law is. Hence, although in judicial precedent, there are many advantages and disadvantages, I personally feel that the advantages outweighs the disadvantages and it is accurate to say that binding precedent ensures the existence of both certainty and flexibility in the common law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A brief, but well written account on what has been covered. Important parts of the system of precedent - the hierarchy of the courts and law reporting have received little mention. As commented several times, the piece could be improved by using decided cases to support the points made.
Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 03/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    esteemed law lords, such as in the case of Central London Property Trust Ltd. v. High Trees House Ltd. [1947]. The doctrine of precedent has existed for quite a while, but it was not until 1865 when the Council for Law Reporting was established and modern reports were published, that it became fully functional.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    person or vehicle, anything which is in or on a vehicle, for stolen or prohibited articles and may detain a person or vehicle for the purpose of such a search. In any place to which at the time when he proposes to exercise this power the public or any section

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    he could tackle if by himself, and because of this the suspects got away then that could mean six months work could have been lost. Ben I am afraid to explain to you that your court case could turn out a litter worse than expected.

  2. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    However, arguably the most affective technique in this scene is not what Moore includes but what he decides to selectively omit. The scene appears to show historical accounts of what America has done in the years previously, however history is the story of both sides and rather than give information

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    Most people make some discrimination between more and less reasonable men, and the most reasonable men make the most coherent and most fine discriminations. More fully, great many people are sometimes able to say that one argument is reasonable and another is not, or that one argument is more reasonable

  2. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    Human beings might not know the truth but God certainly would! There were different kinds of trial by ordeal but whichever one was used; a careful religious ritual was followed. The person taking the ordeal had to fast for three days beforehand and hear mass in the church.

  1. "Discuss the meaning and constitutional significance of the rule of law. Illustrate your answer ...

    Preventive detention, emergency situation, compulsory acquisition of goods and properties, direct enforcement of administrative decision etc. are the best example of exercise of arbitrary power. Again there is a distinction between arbitrary power and discretionary power which dicey failed to trace.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Judge gave direction but said "virtual certainty" (Hyam direction) Conviction was quashed * R v Woolin (1996) W threw a baby at wall. Baby died. Police arrived and W said he didn't know what happened or how baby had died. Later on admitted to it. Oblique intention, however judge used the words 'substantial risk' instead of 'virtual certainty' Appeal

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work