• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is judicial precedent?

Extracts from this document...


What is judicial precedent? What are the main principles that are applied in judicial precedent? Are the different court structure being bound by the decision of others higher courts? To what extend binding precedent ensures the existence of both certainty and flexibility in common law? What are the other advantages and disadvantages that contribute to the doctrine of binding precedent? The doctrine of binding precedent or stare decisis, refers to the fact that, the decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower than its hierachy. Judicial precedent can be applied on cases and to be treated similiarly when the material facts of the cases are identical. ...read more.


Through judicial precedent, lower courts are bound by the decisions of higher courts, hence based on the statement it is accurate to say that the doctrine of binding precedent does ensures both certainty and flexibility in the common law. It creates certainty in the sense where like cases are treated alike if the material facts are identical, and this will enable the lawyers and their clients to predict what the likely outcome of a particular case through previous judicial decisions. It also creates flexibility, where this refers to the fact that judges can manipulate the common law provided, then with an opportunity to develop law in a particular areas without waiting for parliament to enact legislation. ...read more.


to any particular area may become rigid on the basis of an unjust precedent with the consequence that previous injustices are perpetuated. Other than that, judicial precedent also causes unconstitutionality. This is a fundamental question that refers to the fact that the judiciary are overstepping their role by making law rather than restricting themselves to the role of simply applying it, and if this happens than its against the declaratory theory of law claims that judges do not make law, but they simply interpret what the law is. Hence, although in judicial precedent, there are many advantages and disadvantages, I personally feel that the advantages outweighs the disadvantages and it is accurate to say that binding precedent ensures the existence of both certainty and flexibility in the common law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A brief, but well written account on what has been covered. Important parts of the system of precedent - the hierarchy of the courts and law reporting have received little mention. As commented several times, the piece could be improved by using decided cases to support the points made.
Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 03/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    of the public has access, on payment or otherwise, as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission. Or in any other place to which people have ready access at the time when he proposes to exercise the power but which is not a dwelling.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    (The Court Of Appeal; both divisions are bound by the decisions of the House Of Lords and their own previous decisions but the decisions of each division do not bind each other. In Young V Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd (1944)

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    he could tackle if by himself, and because of this the suspects got away then that could mean six months work could have been lost. Ben I am afraid to explain to you that your court case could turn out a litter worse than expected.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Victim died days later after medical treatment. Dears defence was that victim had reopened or neglected the wounds. Appeal is rejected COA - "Only a daft response by the victim would break the chain of causation" 4. MEDICAL PROFESSION R v Jordan (1956) - Victim stabbed and went to hospital.

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    This argument aims at the very root of the formulation of the reasonable man concept as its basic reason for being brought into existence is to create a universal bench mark or yard stick. Still this argument has been successfully countered by many authors in various ways.

  2. "Discuss the meaning and constitutional significance of the rule of law. Illustrate your answer ...

    Today the state regulates national life in multifarious ways. Dicey's second meaning stresses the equal subjection of all persons to the ordinary law. The specific meaning he attached to equality before the law was that all nations were subject to the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts.

  1. 'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

    could not use it to defend defamatory facts made on a person. Therefore the facts the journalist is basing the comment on must be true and stated clearly. For example to say 'her behaviour was disgraceful' is defamatory, but if that comment is fair and based on the persons actions,

  2. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    There was no police force in Saxon England. In the early Saxon kingdoms people relied on their families to help them catch thieves or other wrongdoers. By the tenth century, kings had set up a different kind of self-help system - known as a tithing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work