• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the principles underlying the Poor Law Amendment Act and how far did they reflect contemporary attitudes towards poverty in 1830? Did those responsible for the Act achieve their goals by 1847?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the principles underlying the Poor Law Amendment Act and how far did they reflect contemporary attitudes towards poverty in 1830? Did those responsible for the Act achieve their goals by 1847? In 1834, Britain was about to enter the Victorian Era. A Whig government, which had been in power for three years, made promises of great reform. 1832 had seen the passing of the Reform Bill. Its terms meant that the landowners had to share their monopoly of political power with the middle classes, who were given the right to vote. The immediate result of this was to stimulate a series of reforms within the next twenty years, one of which was the Poor Law Amendment Act. Nineteenth century society was poor by modern standards. Most members of the working class were more than likely to be in poverty at some point in their lives due to many natural reasons, and would have to rely on the support of their families for aid. Contemporary attitudes thought that this was right and proper because it meant that the poor would have to work in order to survive. Typical outlooks were of unconcern, complacency or patronising charity epitomised by Samuel Smiles' pamphlet "Self Help", where he stated that "the common life of everyday provides the workers with scope for effort and self-improvement...even if a man fails in his efforts it will be a great satisfaction to him to enjoy the consciousness of having done his best." Self-help and independence were valued as virtues but help had been being given to the poor since the Poor Laws were created in Elizabethan times. ...read more.

Middle

The report provided the basis of the Poor Law Amendment Act. Its terms were few but radical and designed to save money and improve efficiency. The principles on which the commissioners were to act were that there was to be no "outdoor relief" except for the old and sick. Instead the relief for the poor was to be provided in the workhouse. The conditions were to be "less-eligible" than those of the lowest paid worker outside so that only if someone was truly desperate would they chose to go to the workhouse. Parishes were to be grouped into unions, each of which was to maintain, and if necessary build a workhouse. These workhouses were to be managed locally by a Board of Guardians, elected by the ratepayers. To supervise this whole scheme a central body of three commissions and a secretary was to be set up in Somerset House. The commissioners were Thomas Frankland Lewis, George Nicholls and John Shaw Lefevre. Chadwick was made secretary. They had very wide powers but the main aim was to stop the enormous expenditure from the Poor Rate and to make clear that men should look after themselves for aid, thus enforcing their own beliefs of "Laissez-faire". They wanted to make it clear that "the situation of the person receiving relief should not, on the whole be made really or apparently so eligible as the situation of the labourer of the lowest classes". The main focus, therefore, of the Act was the able-bodied poor who would make it impossible for them to survive without work, therefore reduce the cost of poor relief. ...read more.

Conclusion

Parliament decided to intervene once it saw that the Commissioners had served their purpose and replaced them with the Poor Law Board, intending to rid the administration of the Poor Law arrogance but also to link it with the government, creating a president and two secretaries, with the president as an MP, to be responsive to public opinion. This Board did have clear links with the Poor Law Amendment Act, the essentials of which lasted long into the twentieth century. The aims of those responsible for the Act had been partially reached. In the majority of the country parishes had been joined to form unions and these had built workhouses to employ, house and feed the poor. They specifically were made to be "less-eligible" so that only those in desperate need of a job would be employed, and the others would find themselves jobs or be faced with starvation as all "outdoor relief" was to be abolished, except for the infirm or elderly. To an extent this worked. The cost of poor relief went down considerably but the overall cost was still more than that of the workhouses. Boards of Guardians gave out relief on its own judgement, and there was little the Commissioners could do about this, given their limited powers. Also the Poor Laws had little place in the very industrial North, whose system of employment would be destroyed with the implementation of the laws. It is to this extent that the aims of those responsible for the Poor Laws were achieved by 1847. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    abortion research

    4 star(s)

    Abortion debates involve debates about the status and rights of the fetus, but they are also about far more. It is arguable that the right to an abortion is primarily a right of a woman to control what happens to her body and that the death of the fetus, person

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    The police may question a detained person. Such interviews are tape - recorded. At the start of an interview a suspect must be cautioned 'You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court.

  1. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    and seven per cent had received broken bones at the hands of their partner. Add to that the fact that forty-four per cent of female murder victims are killed by their partner and we have a worrying situation within Britain.

  2. The aims and principles of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act.

    our object is to establish therein a discipline so severe and repulsive as to make them a terror to the poor". (Thompson, 1963, p. 295). Although in previous years the able bodied would wander from parish to parish to gain more relief for themselves, the taxpayers wanted this to stop.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Similar to Dawson. Burgled a house and the householder had a heart attack a short while later Watson denied it was dangerous Judge said to jury 'Do you think it is dangerous to burglar a frail 87 year old mans home?'

  2. The Poor Law was a system established since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, ...

    This system was said to encourage laziness as the poor would have no incentive to work hard or to respect their employers as they knew that their parish would look after them. The allowance system was regarded by the ruling class as an 'unmitigated evil'.

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Thus bringing in the idea of whether or not this information should be freely distributed to the wealthiest countries that in turn produce the product and evenly distribute the product to underprivileged countries. This idea although ideal will, in my eyes, never happen.

  2. To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

    As a result, the process of conversion has taken far longer than expected8. It was not until 1990 that real progress was made when all land in England and Wales was subject to compulsory registration upon sale. Consequently, the registered system is now the accepted norm and it is estimated that 80% of all titles have now been registered9.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work