• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

are words or images recalled better

Extracts from this document...



The aim of this experiment was to discover whether people are more likely to remember words or images. The experimental hypothesis was that there will be a significant difference in the number of words given in a list of 10 images or words; the null hypothesis was that there will be no significant difference between the number of words or images recalled, any chance will be due to chance factors.

A laboratory experimental and repeated measures method was used to gain results for images and words recalled. There were a total of 20 participants, picked from an opportunity sample.

The results were analysed using the Wilcoxon test, and were not found significant at the level of 29.5>13 for a one tailed test. In order for the experiment to be significant, the level of significance should be <13.

This concludes that there is no significant difference between words and images recall.


Scientific research such as Jacobs (1887) and Baddley (1966) have shown that we have both a short term and long term memory. Atkinson and Shiffrin’s multi-store model suggests that incoming data passes through a sensory store into a short-term store. If rehearsal takes place, the information is then transferred to the long-term store.

...read more.



Experimenter effects were used to minimise demand characteristics. The participants may have guessed the hypothesis.

Order effects, 10 participants were shown the list of words fist and 10 participants were shown images first.


There was deception, because informed consent was not possible to avoid demand characteristics. Participants were fully debriefed after the experiment.

Participant had the right to withdraw at any time during the experiment.

...read more.


Implications and suggestions for further research

One major implication that was made in this experiment was that before starting this experiment, background research should have been searched deeper. It was until later realised that there have been no previous experiments on words and images recall. Some on either words or images but none that could have been used in background research.

It was difficult to write the introduction with no background research on words and images recall, if this experiment were repeated; a completely different experiment would take place, which has a lot of background research.


This study found that there is no significant difference between words and images recall. This study may have found a difference if extraneous variables were controlled. If participants were experimented at the same time in the same place with controlled variables these results might have had a significance difference.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Comparing length of words in newspapers section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Comparing length of words in newspapers essays

  1. Are High Imagery Words Easier To Retrieve From The Short Term Memory Than Abstract ...

    and those at the beginning of the list. (Primacy effect) Poorest recall is for the items in the middle of the curve. This implies that recency effect reflects those words that are being retrieved from S.T.M. and primacy effect reflects retrieval from the L.T.M. As participants in this study are given 60 seconds to rehearse the words we can expect some evidence of the primacy and recency effect.

  2. Are participants more likely to recall a list of words, when words are accompanied ...

    Instead of investigating the amount of words that can be recalled Murdock investigated as to whether the positioning of the words in the list increased the likely-hood of them being recalled. As you can see from the graph the first words shown and the last words shown were most likely to be recalled.

  1. Is color naming a controlled process or an automatic process?Experiment

    the third-list is longer than the time taken to read the first list. This is also represented by graph 1. Yellow line, which represents the time taken to read the third list, is higher than the first or second list.

  2. psycology- short term memory

    However I am not as advanced as M in memorising and taking things into my memory. Looking at the table and graph of results, M's memory seems to be better than mine. Or, this could be a result of cue dependant forgetting, M may have forgotten because of the lack of accessibility.

  1. Do people remember more words in the morning or afternoon?

    because of the recency effect and proves that the last few words are still stored in the short term memory. The other words that most participants remembered was the words that they heard first this is called the primacy effect and proves that these words are stored in the long

  2. Investigation into the effects of levels of processing.

    Participants were given a full debrief of their actions to deal with ethical issues, such as deception (for example, some of the participants may have believed that they were being tested on their intelligence, rather than being an example


    with non-integrated stimuli and neutral non-colour words can be generalised to integrated stimuli using two colour words, one congruent and one incongruent. If so, it would be expected that a stimulus comprising one incongruent and one congruent word would produce more interference than a stimulus of two congruent words and less interference than a stimulus of two incongruent words.

  2. An experiment to look at the primacy and recency effect on recalling a word ...

    with a 10 or 30 second delay during which the subject counted backwards there was little effect on the early words but poor recall of later items. This suggests that the later words were held in short term storage and were lost due to interference whereas the earlier words had been passed to long-term storage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work