• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2149

Assessment Report

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ASSESSMENT REPORT

Name: Ebrahim

Chronological Age: 10y 11m

TEST RESULTS

Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children – 3rd Edition (WISC III)

Scaled Scores (range= 1-19; average range= 8-12)

 Verbal Tests Scaled Scores Performance Tests Scaled Scores Information 10 Picture Completetion 1 Similarities 7 Coding 6 Arithmatic 10 Picture Arrangement 1 Vocabulary 9 Block Design 2 Comprehension 5 Object Assembly 1 Digit Span 10 Symbol Search 7
 IQ/ Index Scores Percentile Verbal IQ 101 53 Performance IQ 60 0.4 Full Scale IQ 77 6 Verbal Comprehension 87 19 Perceptual Organisation 50 <0.1 Freedom from Distractibility 101 53 Processing Speed 81 10

Wechsler Objective Reading Dimensions (WORD)

 Standard Score Basic Reading 104 Spelling 111

Wechsler Objective Reading Dimensions (WORD)

 Standard Score Centile Accuracy 108 70 Comprehension 84 14 Rate 108 70

Wechsler Objective Language Dimensions (WOLD)

 Standard Score Centile Listening Comprehension 84 14

ANALYSIS

Ebrahim was administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children– Third Edition (WISC III). This test has five main scores: Full Scale score, Verbal Comprehension score, Perceptual Organisation score, Freedom from Distractibility score and Processing Speed score. Ebrahim’s raw scores on each subtest is related to the performance of other children within the same four month age band (the standardisation sample) to produce scaled scores.

Ebrahim’s Verbal scaled scores (41) gives a Verbal IQ of 89 and places him at the 23rd percentile, his score is below average as it means he scored higher than only 23 out of 100 children from the standardisation sample, in this case, his age group. Ebrahim’s Performance IQ was 53 at the 0.1st percentile which is an exceptionally below average score. In result, his Full Scale IQ score was 67 at the 1st

...read more.

Middle

Since Ebrahim has suffered from difficulties with motor coordination he may be suffering from a mild case of cerebral palsy or his reaction to food colourings and hyperactivity may suggest ADHD.Much of a child's normal intellectual, physical, and social development occurs through play and exploration of the environment however cerebral palsy or ADHD may restrict a child's ability to engage in these activities, and therefore prevent the acquisition of motor skills, knowledge of the world, and social competence. He should be referred to his GP for further medical examination.

Appendix

 Subtests Raw Scores Scaled Scores Verb. Perf. VC PO FD PS Picture Completion 7 1 1 Information 14 10 10 Coding 33 6 6 Similarities 11 7 7 Picture Arrangement 4 1 1 Arithmetic 17 10 10 Block Design 18 2 2 Vocabulary 27 9 9 Object Assembly 8 1 1 Comprehension 14 5 5 Symbol Search 18 (7) 7 Digit Span 14 (10) 10 Sum of Scaled Scores 41 11 31 5 20 13
 Score Difference Significance level Minimum Difference Higher/Lower Significant? VIQ/PIQ 89-53 = 36 0.05 11.0 Higher VIQ sig. higher than PIQ. Verbal Comp./Perc. Org. 87-50=37 0.05 11.8 Higher PO sig. lower than VC. Verbal Comp./Freedom From Dist. 101=87=14 0.05 13.1 Higher VC sig. lower than FD. Verbal Comp./Processing Speed. 87-81=6 0.05 13.8 Lower No sig. diff. Perceptual Org./Freedom From Dist. 101-50=51 0.05 14.4 Higher PO sig. lower than FD. Perceptual Org./Processing Spd. 81-50=31 0.05 15.0 Higher PO sig. lower than PS. Freedom From Dist./Processing Spd. 101-81=20 0.05 16.1 Higher PS sig. lower than FD.
...read more.

Conclusion

td class="c13" colspan="1" rowspan="1">

No sig.

-

Arithmatic

4.25

0.05

3.86

Ari. S.S. sig. higher than Avg. S.S.

5

Vocabulary

3.25

0.05

3.04

Voc S.S. sig. higher than Avg. S.S.

25

Comprehension

0.75

0.05

3.96

No sig.

-

Digit Span

4.25

0.05

3.26

DS S.S. sig. higher than Avg. S.S.

25

Picture Completion

4.75

0.05

3.94

PC S..S. sig. lower than Avg. S.S.

5

Coding

0.25

0.05

3.89

No sig.

-

Picture Arrangement

4.75

0.05

4.04

PA S.S. sig. lower than Avg. S.S.

25

Block Design

3.75

0.05

3.12

BD S.S. sig. lower than Avg. S.S.

25

Object Assembly

4.75

0.05

4.52

OA S.S. sig. lower than Avg. S.S.

10

Symbol Search

1.25

0.05

4.04

No sig.

-

Average Scaled score for 6 subtests (Verbal) = 8.5

 Subtest Difference Sig. Level Min.Diff. Significance Cum.% Information 1.5 0.05 2.99 No sig. - Similarities 1.5 0.05 3.12 No sig. - Arithmetic 1.5 0.05 3.34 No sig. - Vocabulary 0.5 0.05 2.70 No sig. - Comprehension 3.5 0.05 3.41 Com. S.S. sig. higher than Avg S.S. 25 Digit Span 1.5 0.05 2.87 No sig. -

Average Scaled score for 6 subtests (Performance) = 3

 Subtest Difference Sig. Level Min.Diff. Significance Cum.% Picture Completion 2 0.05 3.47 No sig. - Coding 3 0.05 3.43 No sig. - Picture Arrangement 2 0.05 3.55 No sig. - Block Design 1 0.05 2.85 No sig. - Object Assembly 2 0.05 3.92 No sig. - Symbol Search 4 0.05 3.55 SS S.S. sig. higher than Avg. S.S. 10
 WORD Standard Score Predicted Score Difference Sig. Level Higher/Lower Significance? Percentages Basic Reading 104 86 18 0.05 Higher B.R. score sig. better than predicted. 3 Spelling 111 88 23 0.05 Higher Spell. score sig. better than predicted. 1-2

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE IQ Correlation section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE IQ Correlation essays

1. Perform a statistical enquiry that will either prove or disapprove my hypothesis.

I am able to use both to find out the range. From that data I know that the highest SAT level is 5, while the lowest SAT level is 1. To find out the range I have to: 5 - 1 = 4 The range of SAT results is Level

2. Comparison of SATs results to obtain statistical data on students.

Range= level 7-5= 2 The range of levels in science in 2000 is: Range= level 7-3= 4 Maths. The mean level for females in maths in 2000 is: ?fX??f= 5.45 The mean level is 5 for females in maths in 2000.

1. The 3 statements I am going to investigate are: -Does the gender of the ...

To start by comparing the IQ to the KS2 result of the students on average, I will have to find the mean results for the students in both years... IQ Maths English Science Mean level achieved Carmichael Ryan 78 3 3 3 3 Hardy Jeff 113 5 5 5 5

2. An Investigation into Gender-Based Stereotyping Using IQ Estimates

This may have lead the participants to mark the average point, as they did not want to seem un-bright or think themselves as clever, just normal.

1. My hypotheses are: -1. People's average SAT and average GCSE results will have a ...

Of course you can do this the other way around (GCSE to SAT). For example if a person got an average grade of 6 in their GCSE they would be likely to have got around 6.3 as their SAT average.

2. Mayfield High school

80 3 75 225 80 < x ? 90 6 85 510 90 < x ? 100 28 95 2660 100 < x ? 110 49 105 5145 110 < x ? 120 14 115 1610 Totals 100 � 10 150 Mean = 10150 / 100 = 101.50 The median on right handed is lower than left handed.

1. The Game Of Spell

To do this, I picked 10 different categories; each completely different. We first picked 150 genres or formats. Then we decided to write them on pieces of paper and put them in a hat. We did this and subsequently randomly picked 10 genres, these were to be our sources and our supply of data.

2. Mayfield Maths Coursework

Once the stem and leaf diagram is created I can then find the average, mean, mode and median of the correlation. Stem and leaf Diagram Sick days Salary 2345678 0 02 1 785928 2 051225344589965 3 4 3 5 6 7 8 9 This is the stem and leaf diagram

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to
improve your own work