• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case Analysis - The Ford Pinto

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Week 4 – Case Analysis – The Ford Pinto – By: Michelle Hingtgen

Legal Case Analysis

Facts:

        The American Automobile industry has historically been tied to the nations economic cycle in which three or four years were good followed by one or two poor years. In 1977 there were four major U.S. automakers including General Motors, Ford, Chrysler and American Motors. Imports were starting to make their presence in the market because they offered subcompact cars at reasonable prices. Ford started producing the Ford Pinto on August 10, 1970. Ford accelerated the planning process and achieved the design and development time in 38 months, compared to the industry average of 43 months. Ford wanted the car to weigh less than 2,000 pounds and cost less than $2,000. The only Pinto that was first sold was a two-door sedan. The hatchback model and station wagon model followed in later years. They also converted one of its assembly plants from full-size to compact cars in 51 days to help produce many more compact and subcompact cars, which were overtaking the market. Ford had conducted many tests related to the Ford Pinto’s fuel system. An early question was where to safely put the gas tank. They decided to keep the tank in the original location behind the rear axel even though it was determined that above the axel would have been safer.

...read more.

Middle

        Legal Rules:

        The UCC makes the rules that constitute liability. Improper inspection can be filed against Ford because they have a duty to inspect their products for defects that can cause harm. They did inspect the Pinto but make necessary changes. Another legal rule that could gave been brought against Ford is the design defects liability. Manufactures have a duty to design their products to avoid reasonably foreseeable risks of harm. Strict liability under section 402A, American Law Institute. Under strict liability the seller must be engaged in the business of selling the product that harmed the plaintiff. The product must also be in defective condition when sold and be unreasonably dangerous because of that condition. The product must have also not been substantially modified by the plaintiff after the sale and the modifications contributed to the injury or other loss.

Observations:

        Ford had known about the risks and continued to manufacture the Pinto without modification. They knew the fuel system was safe but met the standards at the time. They knew modifications would need to be done in future years were standards were going to change. Ford used a cost benefit analysis by changing the system or installing a new part to make the fuel system more effective. They placed a value on a life by using the economic loss to society standard.

...read more.

Conclusion

Judgment and Rational:

It was in Ford’s best interest to settle out of court and recall the vehicles. They could have faced large fines and large class action lawsuits. Ford could have also lost a lot of consumers because of a negative image they could have given. Ford also was given the opportunity to correct their mistake for a cost less than what it would have been if it had gone to court. It was not the consumers’ fault that they didn’t know the safety of the vehicle. They only had a responsibility to buy a vehicle that they liked and were able to afford. They trusted the standards set by the NHTSA since it was a federal agency. Ethically Ford took advantage of uneducated consumers that are relying on the federal agency that did not fully protect them.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Gary's (and other) Car Sales section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Gary's (and other) Car Sales essays

  1. What Influence Did Henry Ford Have On 1920s America?

    The vast increase of car on the road led to air pollution, traffic problems and many dangerous road accidents. The decline of the city centre I described earlier also meant that public transport went into rapid decline, with fewer people choosing to travel by bus or train, and criminals and

  2. Used Cards - find which factors will influence the price of a second hand ...

    182.25 150 5 10000 5 10.5 -5.5 30.25 165 5 10000 5 10.5 -5.5 30.25 175 6 10000 9.5 10.5 -1 1 149 7 10000 13 10.5 2.5 6.25 179 7 10000 13 10.5 2.5 6.25 108 9 12500 20 23 -3 9 168 5 12500 5 23 -18 324

  1. Used second hand cars

    d� 2 10999 5 23.75043328 2 3 9 4 6595 11 53.96160558 14 -3 9 6 4999 13 63.26965467 18 -5 25 10 7499 9 40.79200592 7 2 4 14 4995 14.5 43.87640449 9 5.5 30.25 19 3795 21 72.06683351 21 0 0 24 1495 30 78.21969697 27 3 9

  2. Factors affecting price of Used Car

    I can't comment on the engine size because with a size like 1.8, this car should be worth less in comparison to 623 GSi that has an engine size of 2.3 yet its price is just a fifth of this one.

  1. I predict that all the cars that I have chosen at random will have ...

    To obtain better results I will have to change my original hypothesis and narrow the number of makes of vehicles down. Because Fords were the most popular cars in my sample, I will use that, instead of something less popular like Vauxhall.

  2. Maths Coursework: Car Prices and Specifications

    The residue value is getting smaller as age increases. In other words, it shows that for a relatively new car, its price maybe hard to determine by its age. But for a rather old car, its price maybe fairly accurately estimated from its age. For example, the price of 2 cars which are one year old can vary between

  1. Legal and Ethical Analysis of Ford Pinto

    In another incident, some Pintos were recalled due to a flaw in the car's air pollution control equipment (12). Finally, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), a regulatory agency reporting directly to the US Congress, had charged that the gas mileage claims made by Ford's Lincoln-Mercury division were inaccurate and exaggerated (13).

  2. Maths coursework - car prices

    amount of samples chosen the most likely that your results would be correct also with the more samples I have taken the results would be more accurate e.g. if I had chosen 50 cars which is not a wide range I would not get accurate results because it is an

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work