• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chrunchie-bone replacement Investigation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Steve Lansdowne

Chrunchie-bone replacement Investigation

Investigation

During this experiment I wish to expand my knowledge of how bones within the body are damaged or effected at all by a force and how much force is needed to take an effect I will be using a crunchie bar to take the place of the bone as they are structurally very similar- a honey comb style.

  I will be testing:

  • Different weights acting on crunchie and effect on compression
  • Surface area (size of face touching base and weight)
  • Height of material
  • Effect of removing chocolate coating of crunchie

Equipment

  • 1kg weights
  • Micrometer
  • Vernier calliper
  • 2 pieces of hardboard
  • 3 crunchie bars
  • Knife
  • Stop watch

Method

For this experiment I will firstly cut the required piece of crunchie bar to size making sure it is very precise and flat edges so no gaps etc in the side. Remove any chocolate if necessary this must be done very carefully and no chocolate left, again leaving flat edges with no broken ends or split edges.

Then before any weight is added the piece must be accurately measured using the micrometer which is accurate to milli meters and a small scale venire calliper. This is recorded so three measurements will be produced, width, length and height.

...read more.

Middle

18

18

10

7

10

3

18

18

10

8

10

3

18

18

10

9

Crumbled

3

From this experiment it can be derived that the maximum weight before collapsing is around 9kg whether the chocolate is on or off, and the actual compression is very minimal, only around 3mm. So for my future experiments I shall use 2kg weight each time.

Experiment 2

In these experiments I have tested the effect of different surface areas on compression I have left the chocolate on for these experiments.

Width (mm)

Length (mm)

Height (mm)

Mass (kg)

New Height (mm)

Compression (mm)

20

30

15

2

15

0

20

30

15

4

15

0

20

30

15

6

14.8

0.2

20

30

14.8

8

14.5

0.5

20

30

14.5

10

14

1

20

30

14

12

13.9

1.1

20

30

13.9

14

Crumbled

1.1

Width (mm)

Length (mm)

Height (mm)

Mass (kg)

New Height (mm)

Compression (mm)

10

10

15

2

14.5

0.5

10

10

14.5

4

14

1

10

10

14

6

13.5

1.5

10

10

13.5

8

Crumbled

1.5

Experiment 3

...read more.

Conclusion

The equipment used was only accurate to 1dp using human judgement, which is not 100% reliable a lot of the time compression was such a small amount readings to an extent would have to be guessed, if the reading was taken at a slight angle then with this equipment would change the result due to lack of time some of the readings were rushed and so this mistake may have been made.

Ways to improve:

  • Use a material such as a high quality sponge that had equal aeration throughout and then aeration differences could also be investigated. The material would also have to be quite durable so that was not effected by handling – a resistant outer shell.
  • Use high tech computerised equipment accurate to 2dp or more maybe a computer program to record results and draw graphs so these would be clearer. This would lessen the possibility of human error as in experiment 3.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Mayfield School Investigation

    Here are the frequency table for height and weight separated into boys and girls. The height and weight is continuous data Boys Height, h (cm) Tally Freq. 110 ? h < 120 0 120 ? h < 130 0 130 ?

  2. Investigating the falling of paper cake cases.

    Evaluation I thought my method was quite reliable, the way I worked in my preliminary work would not have given me accurate enough results, but after addressing why I had so many anomalies, I changed the way I was

  1. Liquid chromatography is a technique used to separate components of a mixture to isolate ...

    until 200�l although there is a decrease of ~10% between 100�l and 200�l and then a further decrease of ~35% from 200�l to 500�l. It could be argued that the column starts overload with sodium benzoate at a lower volume than caffeine but shows a significant decrease in efficiency in the same concentration region.

  2. Mayfield igh Investigation

    5 165.5?h>170.5 20 170.5?h>180 2 170.5?h>180 22 The modal classes are 155.5?h>160.5, 160.5?h>165.5 and 165.5?h>170.5. The median class is (22+1)/2=11.5 which is 160.5?h>165.5. Estimated mean: 3515.75/22=159.81 Heights (cm) 135?h>140.5 1 137.75 137.75 18975.0625 18975.0625 140.5?h>155.5 4 147.5 590 21756.25 87025 155.5?h>160.5 5 157.5 787.5 24806.25 124031.25 160.5?h>165.5 5 162.5 812.5

  1. I am conducting an experiment to show the relationship between the rate of reaction ...

    0.32 0.40 4 8 F 30 39 0.28 0.24 5 8 F 41 23 0.21 0.29 6 8 F 30 29 0.24 0.24 7 8 F 52 47 0.31 0.32 8 8 F 57 47 0.31 0.34 9 8 F 39 22 0.21 0.28 10 8 F 30 27 0.23

  2. height and foot size

    I noticed that every time, the predicted height was always shorter than the actual height. I wondered if the r-value would increase if I was to calculate the correlation coefficient by gender i.e. complete a scatter graph for girls only and a separate graph for boys only.

  1. height, weight, body mass index

    48 20.2 85 7 11 11 Male 1.61 56 21.6 140 7 12 6 Male 1.52 42 18.2 147 7 12 4 Male 1.62 42 16.0 47 8 13 1 Female 1.62 53 20.2 48 8 13 7 Female 1.62 51 19.4 85 8 13 4 Female 1.56 47 19.3

  2. The main force acting on an object falling is gravity

    The surface that the ball lands on. Other variables such as a change in the size or weight of the ball will not be changed. Prediction: I predict that the height after the bounce will be lower than the height the ball was ordinary dropped at.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work