• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 1912

# Data Handling - GCSE Coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

## Hypothesis and Planning

My hypothesis is that there will be a relationship between pupils’ heights and weights. I predict that generally pupils who are taller will weigh more. In order to do this I am going to choose them from Year 11 because I think that this people are more likely to be more fully grown than any of the younger years and may be more in proportion.

In order to carry out my investigation, I should first select the data I will use. I’m going to do this randomly to make it fairer. I can use my calculator to help me choose using the random sample button. When I press shift, RAN#, it will give me a random number between 0 and 1. I need a random number between 1 and 84 for the boys, and between 1 and 86 for the girls, so I should multiply this number by 84 or 86 and round to the nearest whole to get my random sample number. I can then look for this number piece of data on my table.

Once I have collected the data I am going to put it into tally charts. Using a tally chart means it is easier to work out the totals for cumulative frequency graphs and is also easier to make a histogram from. A stem and leaf diagram will also make it easier to find the median of the data.

Middle

h < 140

|||

3

140 < h < 150

||

2

150 < h < 160

||

2

160 < h < 170

||||||||||||

12

170 < h < 180

||||||||

8

180 < h < 190

||||

4

190 < h < 200

|

1

200 < h < 210

|||

3

I’m going to do the same for weight as well:

 Boys Weight, w, (kg) Tally Frequency 40 < w < 45 | 1 45 < w < 50 | 1 50 < w < 55 |||| 4 55 < w < 60 0 60 < w < 65 ||| 3 65 < w < 70 || 2 75 < w < 80 | 1 80 < w < 85 | 1 85 < w < 90 | 1 90 < w < 95 | 1
 Girls Weight, w, (kg) Tally Frequency 40 < w < 45 || 2 45 < w < 50 || 2 50 < w < 55 |||||||| 8 55 < w < 60 | 1 60 < w < 65 ||| 3 65 < w < 70 0 75 < w < 80 0 80 < w < 85 | 1 85 < w < 90 0 90 < w < 95 0

CombinedBoys& Girls

Weight, w, (kg)

Tally

## Frequency

40 < w < 45

|||

3

45 < w < 50

|||

3

50 < w < 55

||||||||||||

12

55 < w < 60

|

1

60 < w < 65

||||||

6

65 < w < 70

||

2

75 < w < 80

|

1

80 < w < 85

||

2

85 < w < 90

|

1

90 < w < 95

|

1

I am now going to do histograms for these tally charts. I think it is good to do a histogram because it makes it easy for me to compare results and see which is the highest. I can compare height and weight on several separate graphs.

Histograms displaying my data in several different ways:

From these graphs I can first see that the higher numbers and lower numbers tend to be more rare. There are very few people who are above 180cm.Most people seem to be around the middle of my graphs. I’m going to work out the average height and average weight later using a stem and leaf diagram. I can also see that generally boys tend to be slightly heavier than girls, because there are more heavy boys in the 70kg – 90kg than in the girls. The modal class interval for height is 160 < h < 170, and the modal class interval for weight is 50 < w < 55.

So far I think I can say that generally those who are taller tend to be heavier, because the graphs seem very similar in shape (small at lower end, high in middle, small at higher end).

I’m going to make a frequency polygon so I can compare girls and boy’s weights and heights on one graph. This will help me try to prove my hypothesis.

You can see from the height frequency polygon that the two different genders follow the same pattern as the histograms. The middle values are much higher than the low values and high values. This again shows that my hypothesis may be true. They are also very similar – girls seem to be a little shorter in some places than the boys.

I’m going to do a stem and leaf diagram. Stem and Leaf diagrams make it very easy to find out the mean, mode, range and median of my results because they are set out easily.

 Boys Height Stem Leaf Frequency 130 2 1 140 0 150 1 1 160 5, 5, 7, 9 4 170 1, 2, 3 3 180 0, 1, 3, 4 4 190 7 1 200 3 1

Conclusion

167

180

132

151

165

173

181

169

183

171

197

172

165

203

184

Weight

66

60

45

40

54

65

75

54

84

64

50

86

76

50

63

GirlsResults

 Height 183 167 160 162 155 133 163 172 168 183 173 133 172 148 203 Weight 60 52 54 56 46 44 54 61 54 64 50 47 50 54 85

The line of best fit is useful for helping me work out averages. For example, I can work out that someone who is 150 cms tall might weigh 50kg. Of course this is only an estimate.

I’m going to make a cumulative frequency graph. Cumulative frequency graphs are good for display continuous data. The cumulative frequency is the running total of the frequency up to the end of the class interval. To find the cumulative frequency I first need to make a running total by adding the numbers.

CombinedBoys& Girls

Weight, w, (kg)

Frequency

## Cumulative Frequency

40 < w < 45

3

3

45 < w < 50

3

6

50 < w < 55

12

18

55 < w < 60

1

19

60 < w < 65

6

25

65 < w < 70

2

27

75 < w < 80

1

28

80 < w < 85

2

30

85 < w < 90

1

31

90 < w < 95

1

32

Combined Girls & Boys

Height, h, (cm)

Frequency

### Cumulative Frequency

130 < h < 140

3

3

140 < h < 150

2

5

150 < h < 160

2

7

160 < h < 170

12

19

170 < h < 180

8

27

180 < h < 190

4

31

190 < h < 200

1

32

200 < h < 210

3

35

From this I can work out which points I need to plot on my cumulative frequency graphs.

Weight: 45, 3  50, 6  55, 18  60, 19  65, 25  70, 27  80, 28  85, 30  90, 31  95, 32

Height:  140, 3  150, 5  160, 7  170, 19  180, 27  190, 31  200, 32  210, 35

Now I have finished all my graphs I think I can say that generally the taller someone is the more they weight. This is not always true as some people weight a lot but are quite short. However I think that my scatter graph especially shows a positive correlation, which tells me that my hypothesis was correct. My hypothesis was also that the Year 11’s would be more fully grown and I believe this is correct too.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

1. ## Edexcel GCSE Statistics Coursework

the box is shifted significantly to the high end, it is negatively skewed, however, none of the four box plots are shifted significantly to either the high end or the low end. Nevertheless, if I were to be analytical, I could say both the box plot showing the weights are

2. ## Math Coursework-Mayfield High Data Handling

However, there are a few obstacles which I encountered. At the start I sampled a lot of data from year 7 - 11. I also made some sub-hypothesis that wasn't very good for contributing evidence towards my main hypothesis such as: The distance traveled by a student and their weight.

1. ## Investigation on the shape and size of limpets on a sheltered rocky shore called ...

3m because in October there are extremely rough seas which tend to induce the spawning of limpet gametes into the sea, which means this limpet may have just moved to lower shore to release its gametes. Which is the explanation to why the larger limpet was present at the vertical height of 3m.

2. ## Mayfield Maths Coursework

Here are the scores that I used to conduct the scatter graphs: Average KS2 Average IQ 2.33 78 2.67 76 3 87.454545 3.33 92.384615 3.67 98.5 4 100.94118 4.33 103 4.67 107.38889 5 115.14286 6 130 Table goes before

1. ## I will be testing the following hypothesis in my pilot study: ...

Also, this is backing up my hypothesis because as shown in my scatter that watching more television affects weight. The data for the students in Year 11in less distributed than other year groups, as shown in the scatter graph above.

2. ## Maths: Data Handling Coursework

This shows that men, even millions of years ago, were bigger and stronger than women. This can also show how men are born to be bigger and stronger than women. So in that sense, my hypotheses are as follows: 1.

1. ## Maths Coursework - Data Handling

<W< 71.79 Yr 7 girls 1.31 <H< 1.77 30.3 <W< 54.32 Yr 10 boys 1.518<H< 1.866 42.81 <W< 73.55 Yr 10 girls 1.501 <H< 1.751 45.798 <W< 62.642 I worked out the acceptable intervals so that I could identify any outliers present Statistical Methods : The methods that I will

2. ## Maths Data Handling

This is similar to the frequency polygons as I will draw a two frequency polygons on each graph, one for boys and one for girls. This will be done for height and weight. Once they are drawn, I will be able to compare the height and weight of girls and

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to