• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dice Game Maths Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dice Game

          Introduction

              My aim in this investigation is to investigate three questions:

          1.     The probabilities of each of A, B or C winning the game.

          2.     Who will be the most likely winner?

          3.     The most likely length of the game in terms of the number of rolls

          of the dice to produce a winner.

          Predictions

              Before I actually do the game in the proper way I’m going to make

          a few predictions. This will help me to understand possible results

          better.

               I predict that C will be the most likely winner as it has the highest probability

          of winning the game when it’s his turn. I say this even though it takes its turn

          last. I believe B will be the second most likely winner as it too has the second

          highest probability; and the same goes for A- least likely for the same reason.

              As for the most likely length of game in terms of the number of rolls of the

          dice to produce a winner - I believe that the answer to this question could be 3

          as it is the first opportunity for C to win and it has a 50% chance of winning

          every throw it has (3/6).

...read more.

Middle

          Conclusion  

              Now that I’ve carried out the experiment and I’m happy that I did it in a clear

          and organised way I can come to a few conclusions. I believe at the present

          moment C has the highest probability in winning – (29/60) overall confirms this.

              Also another conclusion is that C was the most likely winner, I believe this

          was because on each throw it took, it had a 50% chance of winning whereas this

          wasn’t the case with A and B. A had only a 16.6% chance of winning and B

          had a reasonable 33.3% chance of winning each time it took a throw. I have a

          good idea that this was the telling factor in the results that I took down. I think

          that due to the percentage chance of winning C won the most and A the least.

              I am finding that trends are beginning to appear in the results. For a start from

          my results A never won on its first go. If B won it normally won on its first go as

          the next person to throw was C and it won frequently on the third throw – in fact

          it won thirteen out of fifteen times it won, on its first throw (the third throw).

...read more.

Conclusion

          amazing thirteen times out of that fifteen it won on its first throw (which was the

          game’s third throw). This was the main reason I decided that three rolls was the

          most likely.

              So, to sum up my answers are as follows:

          1.     P (Of A winning) = 3/13

                  (      B              ) = 5/13

                  (      C              ) = 5/13

          2.     B and C were the most likely winners equally.

          3. Three rolls                        

          Evaluation

              Overall my experiment has been a successful one and I’ve come to a few

          conclusions that seem to be getting towards firm conclusions, which I can rely

          on. I believe my experiment to be fairly reliable because I took the results down

          carefully and accurately. Also I collaborated my results with someone else to

          give me a more reliable look at my results and confirm any possible patterns.

          This made it increasingly reliable.

              However saying this I would have liked to done a bit more playing of the

          game as the more I played the game the more reliable the results would have

          been. Although one could argue playing the game over and over again may not

          help or influence any conclusions that one’s already drawn up. Also maybe I

          could have drawn a bigger probability tree to possibly help improve the reliability

          of my investigation and give me a clearer idea of a firmer conclusion.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Beyond Pythagoras section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Beyond Pythagoras essays

  1. Beyond Pythagoras

    I will use Pythagoras' theorem to test it .If it does work, then when I substitute the numbers in, the final results will be correct, with the same number on both sides of the equals sign. If it's not, then the formula isn't working and I need to work out one which does.

  2. Beyond Pythagoras

    d + 1/2 ( n - 1 ) ( n - 2 ) c Where: Tn = nth term A = the first term D = the first number in the changing sequence C = the second, continuous difference N = term I will now substitute the numbers from the sequence into the formula.

  1. Beyond Pythagoras

    of a sudden notice that you can add another set of triples into the family 2 sequences and the smallest side still is even, the middle and longest side still has a difference of 2 I worked out easily that on the smallest term that the pattern between the triples

  2. Beyond Pythagoras ...

    So it will become 15=12+(12+3) divide b/2 in the brackets So it will become 152= 122+92 Then it will become 225= 144+81 Finally you times the bases 3,4,5 by four to get a=b+(b+4) So it will become 20=16+ (16+4) divide b/2 in the brackets So it will be 202= 162+ 122 400= 256 + 144 Now to find the formula of this.

  1. Was Maths invented or discovered?

    The value of Pi is 3.141592 and carries on infinitely. Similarly to the Pythagoras Theorem, we can assume that before Pi was discovered, a circles circumference equalled to 2 x (Pi) x its radius. Therefore, if both, the Pythagoras Theorem and Pi, worked before known to man, it means that they were discovered.

  2. Research on Pythagoras and his work.

    The outer circle of the Society were known as the akousmatics and they lived in their own houses, only coming to the Society during the day. They were allowed their own possessions and were not required to be vegetarians. Of Pythagoras's actual work nothing is known.

  1. Beyond Pythagoras.

    There is only a difference of +1 between 2n and the shortest side, so this means the formula should be 2n+1. To see if I'm correct I will now test this formula. 2n+1 Nth term Length of shortest side 1 3 2x1+1=3 (correct)

  2. The Die Investigation.

    that these could probably be greatly simplified so I did and from this I noticed that you could easily make As attempts with the same denominator on the bottom of the fraction as the others so I added another row to the table.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work