• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Document length: 2767 words

elationship exists or can be established between the height and weight of students

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Mathematics Coursework Aim The aim of this investigation is to distinguish if a relationship exists or can be established between the height and weight of students ageing from 12 yrs to 16 yrs in year groups 7 to 11 in a mixed in a boys and girls school. To execute this investigation I have to acquire information from Mayfield School survey, this will provide me with the relevant data which will be interrogated and analysed to investigate the hypothesis. Prediction The hypothesis for this investigation, in relation to the aim, is that the taller the person the heavier their body weight for both boys and girls. But that this proportion is different between girls and boys. The ratio of weight to height is lower for girls than for boys. This overall prediction may show anomalies which may contradict the hypothesis. Method The method used in this investigation will consist of the following processes.; 1. Firstly I will gather the relevant information from the Mayfield survey and put the data into order for every year group by gender. The summary results are shown in the Table 1 Year Group Number of boys Number of girls Total 7 151 131 282 8 145 125 270 9 118 143 261 10 106 94 200 11 84 86 170 Total number of pupils 1183 Table 1 - gender by year group 2. I will be using a random selection of 150 pupils from the Mayfield survey; I chose this number because it represents the average class size for a typical school for 5 year groups. ...read more.

Middle

1.60 50 10 Agha Shohaib Male 1.66 70 10 Bennet Norman Male 1.75 56 10 Brown Thomas Male 1.63 40 10 Carmichael Ryan Male 1.70 60 10 Dolt Anthony Male 1.60 47 10 Hawks Tony Male 1.77 59 10 Hunt Gareth Male 1.72 62 10 Jones Lee Male 1.75 59 10 Larry Liam Male 1.65 47 10 Leavy Thomas Male 1.72 71 10 McDonald Harold Male 1.62 50 10 McManus Anthony Male 1.73 50 10 Ray Adam Male 1.80 40 10 Smith Arnold Male 1.54 54 10 Tison Wilfred Male 1.80 72 Random selection for Year 11 Year Group Surname Forename 1 Gender Height (m) Weight (kg) 11 Ali Amera Female 1.62 56 11 Berry Shelly Female 1.68 54 11 Biddle Vicky Female 1.56 50 11 Butt Paveen Female 1.65 54 11 Calik Nadia Female 1.68 48 11 Dion Dawn Female 1.68 47 11 Flawn Elise Female 1.62 51 11 Hakins Danielle Female 1.03 45 11 Iilyas Ameri Female 1.62 48 11 Kelly Freda Female 1.60 45 11 McCreadie Billie Female 1.63 38 11 McMorrison Victoria Female 1.65 52 11 O'Donall Megan Female 1.33 55 11 Thomson Jade Female 1.52 48 11 Wilson Charlene Female 1.65 48 11 Black Kevin Male 1.86 56 11 Brown Kevin Male 1.85 73 11 Cullen Sam Male 1.55 54 11 Shaheen Molandar Male 1.63 59 11 Hossany Selim Male 2 86 11 Jaesie Rispect Male 1.74 50 11 Lee Brett Male 1.83 75 11 Major William Male 1.8 68 11 McDonald James Male 1.62 50 11 Oliver Marcus Male 1.57 49 11 Powers Alan ...read more.

Conclusion

It showed males were sometimes unstable especially at younger ages than respective females' heights between the range 1.4m - 1.8m and 30-70kg. Females have a similar spread of height as boys but their overall range of weight for respective year groups is much less i.e. boys have a larger weight range than girls of the same year group. The regression line for males varies much more than females this is reflective of the larger mean averages for boys. For all the females from years 7 to 11 had either positive correlation or no correlation at all, girls tended to follow the general idea that the taller you are the heavier you are. For all males from years 7 to 11 had positive correlation apart from one year where we could say that we were shown negative correlation, year 9 males did not fit the general term where we have someone that is 1.55m tall and weights 67kg (approx) and someone who is 1.80m and weights 42kg (approx) this results in a negative gradient. I later went on to see if there was a relationship between every female and every male, I found that there was stronger correlation within female as every pupil was close and compact and there was a fairly strong correlation within boys but still a couple of pupils did not fit the trend. A larger sample would provide a greater level of confidence in the analysis as relying upon a random selection can only provide a certain level of mathematically based confidence All my work was carried out using Microsoft Word and Excel. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tanveer Virdee 11G3 October 2004 1 of 10 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. A hypothesis is the outline of the idea/ideas which I will be testing and ...

    Also I feel this trend may be since the TV helps stimulate a child mind to a certain degree and whichever program it may be it has some effect on the way a child lives there live and in my sample the effect is largely positive as I have duly come to find.

  2. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    Girls Upper Outlier = 1.5 × IQR (0.15) + upper quartile (1.66m) = 0.225 + 1.66m = 1.885m Anything above that value is an outlier which I will then only extend the whiskers to the highest value under the upper outlier (1.885m).

  1. Investigation on the shape and size of limpets on a sheltered rocky shore called ...

    From looking at the statistical table I have a critical value of 2.021. This value is smaller than my calculated t value of 7.47, which means I can reject my null hypothesis which proves my 2 means are significantly different.

  2. For my project I am investigate the relationship between weight, height and body mass ...

    1.62 72 27.4 84 0.013443913 10 Slone Mark Paul Male 1.58 60 24.0 85 0.01861088 10 Leavy Thomas Male 1.72 71 24.0 86 0.026756705 10 Adam Stanley Stevens Male 1.8 49 15.1 87 0.047735188 10 Leahy Cliff John Male 1.65 54 19.8 88 0.057347086 10 Javidson Carlos Male 1.7 57

  1. height, weight, body mass index

    Male 1.55 50 20.8 58 10 15 6 Male 1.75 45 14.7 73 10 15 10 Male 1.75 57 18.6 75 10 15 10 Male 1.63 56 21.1 104 10 15 10 Male 1.50 65 28.9 40 11 16 0 Female 1.80 42 13.0 41 11 16 6 Female 1.55

  2. An investigation into the relationship between the height and weight of pupils at Mayfield ...

    To ensure that my hypothesis is still correct I am going to plot a revised histogram of girls' height and frequency polygon to compare the two genders. I do not need to plot the height of boys histogram again as it does not contain any outliers.

  1. From the data I have received I have chosen to conduct an investigation comparing ...

    So whilst in general girls weigh more than boys, we have evidence to suggest that 11 out of 25 or 44% f the boys have a weight greater than the median for the girls. I am now going to establish the standard deviation for height and weight, for the boys and girls of my sample.

  2. Maths Data Handling

    > The median height and weight for boys is higher than the median height and weight for girls. > The box and whisker diagrams conclude that, in general, boys are taller and heavier than girls, but not exclusively so. The cumulative frequency curves show that 41% of girls have a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work