Emma's Dilemma

Authors Avatar
MOHAMED KHALIFA MATHEMATICS

INTRODUCTION:

For mathematics, we were given the Coursework of investigating "Emma's Dilemma." This Coursework is set up in a number of steps which builds up to a formula in which one could enter any number of letters, with or without repeated letters, and come out with the number of possible permutations in which these words could be expressed. For this reason, I decided that I will not follow the steps and begin by investigating what is required, which is come up with the formula. I shall begin my task by looking at the possible number of ways in which I could write a word which has no letters repeated in it. I shall express the phrase "possible number of words" with the symbol ?.

WORDS WITH NO REPEATED LETTERS:

I shall start by looking at such words starting from single lettered words (Most of my words will not make sense):

- ? (a) = 1

2- ? (ed) = ed, de = 2

3- ? (cat) = cat, cta, tac, tca, act, atc = 6

4- ? (lucy) = (lucy, luyc, lcuy, lcyu, lycu, lyuc) * 4 = 24.

Notice how I multiplied the last example by 4 to get the ?. This is because I have noticed something as I was working out the ?. I have found that I was going to repeat everything I was doing 4 times. Similarly, I have realised that I was doing every thing 3 times for the second letter, twice for my third letter and once for my last. Hence, I could say that to work out the ? for a four letter word, I am merely multiplying 4*3*2*1 and this gives me 24, which is the correct answer. I could express this as 4!. Could I however say this for words made up of a different amount of letters? I shall test this.

I have already worked out the ? of 1, 2 & 3 letter words so I will thus test what I have found on them.

Will the ? of 3, 2, 1 be 3!, 2!, 1! ?
Join now!


(i) 3! = 3*2*1 = 6. The expression is successful for 3.

(ii) 2! = 2*1 = 2. The expression is successful for 2.

(iii) 1! = 1. The expression is successful for 1.

Having tested the expression, I could therefore say that it is a success. I could also generalise this expression and say that if X is the number of letters in any word, then ?(X) = X!.

WORDS WITH REPEATED LETTERS:

Having found that ?(X) = X! where X is the number of letters in a word with no repititions, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay