• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Face Recognition.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Andrew Jakeman                09/05/07

Face Recognition

          Face recognition are processes involved in recognition of faces. Explanations of face recognition include feature analysis versus holistic forms. Remembering and recognising faces is an important skill we apply each day of our lives. It is important to our social interactions, to work and school activities, and in our personal family lives. Although most of the research in this area has been undertaken on ‘faces’ it is in fact rare in real life that we need to identify someone from their face alone. Information from a person’s clothes, voice, mannerisms etc, and the context in which we encounter them all help in the identification process. Sometimes we fail to recognise someone because they are not wearing the clothes we normally see them in or because they are in an unexpected context.

           Holistic form theory is an alternative to feature analysis approach to face recognition. Although features are important in describing faces and therefore do have some role to play in face recognition, reliance only on bottom – up processing for such a complex activity is very unlikely. Bruce and Young (1986)

...read more.

Middle

            Similar research involves disrupting the configuration of the faces in other ways, either by scrambling the facial features or by inverting the face.

             Haig (1984) showed how recognition times increased for faces of famous people where the spacing between features or the configuration of features had been altered. Yin (1969) found that inverted faces are much harder to recognise. Although errors are found when attempting to recognise any object that has been inverted, faces seem to produce particular difficulties. Cohen (1989) suggests that this demonstrates that faces “are normally recognised holistically, and inversion destroys the global pattern relationships between features.” Thus, such findings could be interpreted as evidence for the holistic approach to face recognition.        

            Further support for a holistic model of face recognition comes from studies investigating the superiority of recognition over recall. People have been found to be consistently better at recognising faces seen before than they are at recalling them.

            A study by Ellis et al (1975) illustrates the difficulties involved in recalling faces. Participants were shown six photographs of male faces for ten seconds and then asked them immediately to recall the face so that it could be reconstructed using photofit materials.

...read more.

Conclusion

         Holistic form theory is an alternative to feature analysis approach to face recognition. Although features are important in describing faces and therefore do have some role to play in face recognition, reliance only on bottom – up processing for such a complex activity is very unlikely. According to the Holistic approach a face is recognised as a whole, analysing not just the separate features but also the configuration of the face, the relationship between the individual features, feelings aroused by the face and semantic information about the face.

          There is also another theory called feature analysis theory which is an example of a bottom – up theory in which it is suggested that analysis if individual facial features plays a crucial role in face recognition.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hidden Faces and Cubes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hidden Faces and Cubes essays

  1. Shapes Investigation I will try to find the relationship between the perimeter (in cm), ...

    Unfortunately, as I do not have any dotted paper that will accommodate 5- and 7-sided shapes, this will not be possible - though I would have liked to do try them out. I have predicted that somewhere in these universal formulas I will have to incorporate the number of sides the shape has.

  2. gcse maths shapes investigation

    will give you a number to which you add 2 to get the number of sides of that shape. With this in mind, you can see that when you subtract 2 from the number of sides, you get a number which, when multiplied by the number of shapes, gives a

  1. mathsI will try to find the correlations between the perimeter (in cm), dots enclosed ...

    4 16 28 3 16 30 2 16 32 1 16 34 0 16 Firstly I will test my previous formulas, P=T+2-2D, D=(T+2-P)/2 and T= P+2D-2, to see if they hold true - of course, substituting T with Q. If the formulas still hold true, I will be able to

  2. A person is defined as being homeless when he/she lacks a fixed nightime

    - http://www.coursework.info/ This document was downloaded from Coursework.Info - The UK's Coursework Database - http://www.coursework.info/ This document was downloaded from Coursework.Info - The UK's Coursework Database - http://www.coursework.info/ ��]^��AB��%&����������������hn�hn�OJQJhn�hn�CJOJQJ%hn�hn�OJQJfHq� ����)hn�hn�CJOJQJfHq� ����hn�h{P� h{P�hn�I�� [ � � + k � � G � � #

  1. I am doing an investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes.

    now move on to finding a formula linking the number of squares (Q), the perimeter and the number of dots enclosed. I will do the same as I did for triangles - draw out shapes with different numbers of squares, record the number of hexagons in the shape, the perimeter in cm and the dots.

  2. Am doing an investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes (starting ...

    All the different shapes in the T=20 table work with this formula. Therefore I will test the formula with all the other tables below, so I can be sure that it does work with all numbers of triangles. If it works with all four of the numbers of triangles that

  1. Shapes (starting with triangles, then going on squares and hexagons. I will try to ...

    However if I were to change to formula to P-2-2D, then 12-2-10=0, which is incorrect. Now I shall test this with all different values of P and D, but with a constant T of 20. I will substitute P and D for their numerical values in the T=20 table, and use them in the above formula (P-2+2D=T)

  2. I am doing an investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes ...

    However, as this is in effect a formula triangle (of sorts), all indices (D, P and T) must be incorporated. With T=20 and P=12, P-2 +/-D=T � 12-2 +/-5=T. So T=15 or 5. If I were to make it P-2+2D=T, then that would mean that 12-2+10=20, therefore T=20, which is correct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work