Boys IQ
80<IQ<85= 0cobf bfr sebfbfw orbf bfk inbf fobf bf.
85<IQ<90= 4 mi5gK95a from mi5gK95a coursewrok mi5gK95a work mi5gK95a info mi5gK95a
90<IQ<95= 2 Heidegger denied channyman69's rationalisation .
95<IQ<100=9coeg egr seegegw oreg egk ineg foeg eg.
100<IQ<105= 6cogg ggr seggggw orgg ggk ingg fogg gg!
105<IQ<110= 3coca car secacaw orca cak inca foca ca.
110<IQ<115= 7coff ffr seffffw orff ffk inff foff ff;
115<IQ<120=4cofb fbr sefbfbw orfb fbk infb fofb fb.
120<IQ<125= 0 channyman69, please do not redistribute this essay. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this essay elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
125<IQ<130=1 kq8yEQW from kq8yEQW coursewrok kq8yEQW work kq8yEQW info kq8yEQW
Girls IQ
80<IQ<85= 0cogd gdr segdgdw orgd gdk ingd fogd gd.
85<IQ<90= 4 Ebo from Ebo coursewrok Ebo work Ebo info Ebo
90<IQ<95= 2coae aer seaeaew orae aek inae foae ae:
95<IQ<100=4coff ffr seffffw orff ffk inff foff ff;
100<IQ<105= 7coea ear seeaeaw orea eak inea foea ea!
105<IQ<110= 5cofg fgr sefgfgw orfg fgk infg fofg fg!
110<IQ<115= 4coac acr seacacw orac ack inac foac ac.
115<IQ<120=2 PRvs Visit coursework dd in dd fo dd for dd more work dd Do dd not dd redistribute PRvs
120<IQ<125= 0 channyman69, please do not redistribute this cours. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this cours elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
125<IQ<130=0cofb fbr sefbfbw orfb fbk infb fofb fb;
Boys Heights
120<H<130=0 2OZwTXJGB from 2OZwTXJGB coursewrok 2OZwTXJGB work 2OZwTXJGB info 2OZwTXJGB
130<H<140=0coaf afr seafafw oraf afk inaf foaf af:
140<H<150=5 xBho from xBho coursewrok xBho work xBho info xBho
150<H<160=8cobe ber sebebew orbe bek inbe fobe be!
160<H<170=4 aguuR3H Visit coursework da in da fo da for da more essay da Do da not da redistribute aguuR3H
170<H<180=8cogd gdr segdgdw orgd gdk ingd fogd gd.
180<H<190=0codf dfr sedfdfw ordf dfk indf fodf df.
190<H<200=1 yYw from yYw coursewrok yYw work yYw info yYw
Girls Heights
120<H<130=0 Carstens suppressed channyman69's postmodernism theory.
130<H<140=0codd ddr seddddw ordd ddk indd fodd dd;
140<H<150=2codb dbr sedbdbw ordb dbk indb fodb db.
150<H<160=11coff ffr seffffw orff ffk inff foff ff.
160<H<170=8cofg fgr sefgfgw orfg fgk infg fofg fg.
170<H<180=7coeb ebr seebebw oreb ebk ineb foeb eb!
180<H<190=0codc dcr sedcdcw ordc dck indc fodc dc.
190<H<200=0coga gar segagaw orga gak inga foga ga.
Since IQ and Height is continuous data, so I have chosen to group the data in intervals of fives. I think that now I can go to the stage where I can put my results in a graph. This will allow me to analyse and compare my data for different things.
IQ
As I said before IQ is continuous data so I cant use bar graphs to show it. Instead I will use histograms as this is a suitable graph I can use to record grouped data continuous data. Before I produce the graph I have to make another hypothesis "Boy will usually have a higher IQ than boys. ufQL from ufQL coursewrok ufQL work ufQL info ufQL
Histogram of Boys IQ
This project from www.studentcentral.co.uk
Histogram of Girls IQcoab abr seababw orab abk inab foab ab!
This hypothesis from www.studentcentral.co.uk
By looking at the two graphs I can tell there is a contrast between the Boys and Girls IQ. But to make it even more detailed I will need to make both sets of data on the same graph. Making a frequency polygon will make the comparison a lot clear. Heidegger denied channyman69's structuration idea.
Frequency Polygon for Boys and Girls IQ
Marx oppressed channyman69's postmodernism .
This graph supports my hypothesis. It shows that there are boys that have an IQ over 120, whereas there are no girls which have an IQ over 120. Similarly there are only girls which have an IQ of 80 and 90 interval. By looking at the graph I am able to work out the modal group. But however it is not as easy to work out the mean, range and medium. So to do this I have decided to make a stem and leaf diagrams. Then I will be able to read each individual IQ, rather than group IQ's. K67fwN7e from K67fwN7e coursewrok K67fwN7e work K67fwN7e info K67fwN7e
Boys
Stem Leaf Frequencycodf dfr sedfdfw ordf dfk indf fodf df;
80 6,9,9 3 si8PRh Visit coursework ag in ag fo ag for ag more dissertation ag Do ag not ag redistribute si8PRh
90 8,6,6,7,7,0,8 7 channyman69, please do not redistribute this work. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this work elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
100 2,4,0,0,4,2,1,0,4,6 10coeb ebr seebebw oreb ebk ineb foeb eb:
110 9,2,2,0,7,6,2,9 8 v1Wwhddp Visit coursework ce in ce fo ce for ce more dissertation ce Do ce not ce redistribute v1Wwhddp
120 8 1 Heidegger theorised channyman69's structuration .
130 0 Foucault oppressed channyman69's functionalism .
Girls
Stem Leaf Frequencycofe fer sefefew orfe fek infe fofe fe:
80 7,8 2coee eer seeeeew oree eek inee foee ee.
90 1,6,8,4,7,4,0,8 8 This dissertation from www.studentcentral.co.uk
100 3,7,1,8,7,5,2,0,3,1,6,7 10 Foucault theorised channyman69's marxism idea.
110 16,12,14,16,12,13, 6 Marx theorised channyman69's functionalism .
120 0 This essay from www.studentcentral.co.uk
130 0 cTJIu9hb from cTJIu9hb coursewrok cTJIu9hb work cTJIu9hb info cTJIu9hb
This is a table with the results for boys and girls:-coae aer seaeaew orae aek inae foae ae.
(The figures I have got have been rounded to the nearest figure)coaa aar seaaaaw oraa aak inaa foaa aa.
Despite most of the girls and boys having the majority of their IQ's in the 100-110's. 12 out of 30 girls are in this category. Whereas only 11 out of 30 boys. This is easily seen. This essay from www.studentcentral.co.uk
My evidence shows the average boy is brighter by 5 than of the average girl. Also another thing my evidence shows is that the boys IQ is more spread out with 42 as its range rather than the girls which has 29 as its range.cogc gcr segcgcw orgc gck ingc fogc gc.
Histogram of Boys Heights
BqUrtw from BqUrtw coursewrok BqUrtw work BqUrtw info BqUrtw
Histogram of Girls Heights Eih from Eih coursewrok Eih work Eih info Eih
coad adr seadadw orad adk inad foad ad;
As with the IQ I can see the obvious differences between the girls and the boys heights. But the data is not shown in a way in which I can compare it, so that is why I am going to put the two sets of data into one frequency polygon Carstens oppressed channyman69's realism .
Frequency Polygon of Boys and Girls Heights
dCuB5D Visit coursework ag in ag fo ag for ag more work ag Do ag not ag redistribute dCuB5D
This shows that the girls heights only reach up to 190 whereas the boys heights go up to 200.coff ffr seffffw orff ffk inff foff ff.
Boys
Stem(cm)Leaf Frequencycogb gbr segbgbw orgb gbk ingb fogb gb:
120 0 3utD Visit coursework ed in ed fo ed for ed more cours ed Do ed not ed redistribute 3utD
130 0 wIacr8aO from wIacr8aO coursewrok wIacr8aO work wIacr8aO info wIacr8aO
140 2,8,8 3cocc ccr seccccw orcc cck incc focc cc:
150 0,0,3,3,4,4,7,9,9 9 This work from www.studentcentral.co.uk
160 0,0,0,2,2,3,8,8 8 This project from www.studentcentral.co.uk
170 1,2,2,3,5,5,7,7 8 This writing from www.studentcentral.co.uk
180 2 1coeb ebr seebebw oreb ebk ineb foeb eb!
190 1 1 channyman69, please do not redistribute this work. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this work elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
Girls
Stem(cm) Leaf Frequencycofe fer sefefew orfe fek infe fofe fe:
120 SB7mTZrap Visit coursework cd in cd fo cd for cd more work cd Do cd not cd redistribute SB7mTZrap
130 9 1 channyman69, please do not redistribute this writing. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this writing elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
140 9 1 This dissertation from www.studentcentral.co.uk
150 0,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,8,9 9coge ger segegew orge gek inge foge ge.
160 0,0,1,1,2,2,5,5,8 8 channyman69, please do not redistribute this project. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this project elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
170 0,0,2,2,3,5,6 6 Carstens refuted channyman69's marxism .
180 0 1 This writing from www.studentcentral.co.uk
190coef efr seefefw oref efk inef foef ef.
Now with these more even detailed results, I can now see the exact frequency of each of the people heights, into groups. As with graphs you cannot actually tell. It could be that point in the group 140<H<150 could be 140cm. So I feel it is good to see what exact points you are dealing with. I can now work out the mean, median and range of the data. The results are as follows:- Carstens denied channyman69's structuration .
From this results my modal for the girls is actually higher than the modal of the boys. This is very visible on my frequency polygon. As the girls line reaches higher that the boys line. This not actually does follow my hypothesis because just because the modal is higher does not mean the group which has the greatest height. But the median height is actually the same for both girls and boys. But when it is the range of results similarly to the IQ the boys' range is higher than the girls. It has the difference of 8 between them. Of what I have done , my conclusion are only based on a random sample of thirty boys and 30 girls. So they are not 100% accurate. And I will sometime extend my sample later in order to make it more accurate. I feel now that it is time for me to work out the quantities and medians of the both sets of data. As this will be grouped data so I can make stem and leaf diagrams. channyman69, please do not redistribute this paper. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this paper elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
So to do this I am going to produce cumulative frequency graphs as this is very good when comparing grouped continuous data. And I can make a further conclusion when comparing the heights and the IQ results separately. I am also going to make box and whisker diagrams on the same curve because this will allow me to find the median, upper and lower quartiles and inter-quartile ranges much easier. I am firstly going to look at the IQ and make the best match possible I am going to put boys and girls mixed on one graph. channyman69, please do not redistribute this work. We work very hard to create this website, and we trust our visitors to respect it for the good of other students. Please, do not circulate this work elsewhere on the internet. Anybody found doing so will be permanently banned.
Box And Whisker Diagrams
A box and Whisker diagram show the spread of data. It also shows the upper quartile, lower quartile and the inter-quartile range. The median is the middle number. The upper quartile is the value three quarters of the data. And one quarter is above. The lower quartile is 1 one quarter of the data set. And three quarters are above. The inter quartile range is the difference in value between the upper quartile and the lower quartile values.cogf gfr segfgfw orgf gfk ingf fogf gf;
Cumulative Frequency Table
Boys
Cumulative Frequency Table
Girlscoga gar segagaw orga gak inga foga ga.
codb dbr sedbdbw ordb dbk indb fodb db.
coab abr seababw orab abk inab foab ab.
My two curves above show that it goes towards the higher IQ's for the boys and girls. From my box and whisker diagrams I have worked out: -coag agr seagagw orag agk inag foag ag;
The results I have do agree with my hypothesis that boys have a higher IQ than girls. Because the lower quartile is higher by two than the girls which is 87, also the upper quartile is higher and the inter quartile range. And also the mean for the boys is higher by 5 than the girls IQ.codc dcr sedcdcw ordc dck indc fodc dc.
Box and Whisker diagrams and Cumulative Frequency For heights
Boys 5G3a5ko9 Visit coursework da in da fo da for da more coursework da Do da not da redistribute 5G3a5ko9
Girlscoff ffr seffffw orff ffk inff foff ff:
coeb ebr seebebw oreb ebk ineb foeb eb:
cogb gbr segbgbw orgb gbk ingb fogb gb!
These results show a trend for the higher heights for the boys and girls. As I did with my IQ box and whisker diagram I have got the following information: -coaf afr seafafw oraf afk inaf foaf af!
These results do not follow my prediction that girls are taller than boys. Because the lower quartile for the boys is higher than the girls. Also it is the same with the Upper Quartile and the inter-Quartile range. The mean of the boys is higher than the girls. From all of the evidence I have collected so far I have found out that the boys IQ is higher than the girls, which is what I originally predicted. And I have found out that the boy's heights are taller than the girls. And this helps me conclude my original hypothesis Boys have a higher IQ than boys and Girls are taller than boys. CqCn Visit coursework gd in gd fo gd for gd more coursework gd Do gd not gd redistribute CqCn
When looking at my cumulative frequency graphs for IQ and Heights I can say they are kind of the same. And there is no relationship between the IQ and Height as of yet. I am now going to extend my investigation so that IQ and Height can be related. The best way to do this is to make a scatter diagram. I am going to do girls and boys separately because it will make a stronger correlation. The good thing about scatter diagrams is they allow me to compare the correlations of two graphs. And get the line of best fit for each girls and boys. Mfjk5c6sP Visit coursework dc in dc fo dc for dc more cours dc Do dc not dc redistribute Mfjk5c6sP
Boys Scatter Diagram Of IQ and Height
This graph shows a positive correlation between the height and weight, and all the points seem to fit close to the line of best fit. iXLVZfm Visit coursework ef in ef fo ef for ef more essay ef Do ef not ef redistribute iXLVZfm
Girls Scatter Diagram Of IQ and Height
cobe ber sebebew orbe bek inbe fobe be.
This graph also shows a strong correlation and this correlation is about the spread for both the boys and the girls. Most of the points on the graph are mostly next to and near each other. This is round about the same on the boys graph as well. Since both my lines of best fit are straight the line of the equation would obviously be y=mx+c. Where y would be the IQ and X be the height in centimetres. This means I could predict results.
