• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gradient function

Extracts from this document...

Introduction


My coursework on the gradient function is to investigate the gradient on different points on the line and curves.

I will start of my investigation with y = x2. This will be a parabolic curve and the gradient will move from point to point. I will need to start of with a fixed point. I have chosen (2, 4). I will use a table to get close to the point. My table will have five columns. The first column will be x, which will have any numbers between 1and 3. The second column will be y, which will be the result of squaring an x numeral. The third column will be the increase in y, where squared value gets subtracted from 4. The fourth column will be the increase in x, this is where the x values get subtracted from 2. The fifth and last column will be the gradient, where the change in y divided by the change in x, gives me the results. I will do different fixed points so the numbers will vary.

...read more.

Middle

21.6

2.5

25

-11

-0.5

22

2.6

27.04

-8.96

-0.4

22.4

2.7

29.16

-6.84

-0.3

22.8

2.8

31.36

-4.64

-0.2

23.2

2.9

33.64

-2.36

-0.1

23.6

2.99

35.7604

-0.2396

-0.01

23.96

2.999

35.976

-0.023996

-0.001

23.996

3

36

0

0

0

3.0001

36.0024

0.00240004

0.0001

24.0004

3.001

36.024

0.024004

0.001

24.004

3.01

36.2404

0.2404

0.01

24.04

3.1

38.44

2.44

0.1

24.4

3.2

40.96

4.96

0.2

24.8

3.3

43.56

7.56

0.3

25.2

3.4

46.24

10.24

0.4

25.6

3.5

49

13

0.5

26

3.6

51.84

15.84

0.6

26.4

3.7

54.76

18.76

0.7

26.8

3.8

57.76

21.76

0.8

27.2

3.9

60.84

24.84

0.9

27.6

3.99

63.6804

27.6804

0.99

27.96

3.999

63.968

27.968004

0.999

27.996

4

64

28

1

28

Power: 2

Coefficient: 2

Fixed point: 3

My second fixed point is 5, 100

x

y

increase in y

increase in x

gradient

4

64

-36

-1

36

4.1

67.24

-32.76

-0.9

36.4

4.2

70.56

-29.44

-0.8

36.8

4.3

73.96

-26.04

-0.7

37.2

4.4

77.44

-22.56

-0.6

37.6

4.5

81

-19

-0.5

38

4.6

84.64

-15.36

-0.4

38.4

4.7

88.36

-11.64

-0.3

38.8

4.8

92.16

-7.84

-0.2

39.2

4.9

96.04

-3.96

-0.1

39.6

4.99

99.6004

-0.3996

-0.01

39.96

4.999

99.96

-0.039996

-0.001

39.996

5

100

0

0

0

5.0001

100.004

0.00400004

0.00010

40.0004

5.001

100.04

0.040004

0.001

40.004

5.01

100.4004

0.4004

0.01

40.04

5.1

104.04

4.04

0.1

40.4

5.2

108.16

8.16

0.2

40.8

5.3

112.36

12.36

0.3

41.2

5.4

116.64

16.64

0.4

41.6

5.5

121

21

0.5

42

5.6

125.44

25.44

0.6

42.4

5.7

129.96

29.96

0.7

42.8

5.8

134.56

34.56

0.8

43.2

5.9

139.24

39.24

0.9

43.6

5.99

143.5204

43.5204

0.99

43.96

5.999

143.952

43.952004

0.999

43.996

6

144

44

1

44

Power: 2

Coefficient: 2

Fixed point: 5

My third fixed points : 7, 196

x

y

increase in y

increase in x

gradient

6

144

-52

-1

52

6.1

148.84

-47.16

-0.9

52.4

6.2

153.76

-42.24

-0.8

52.8

6.3

158.76

-37.24

-0.7

53.2

6.4

163.84

-32.16

-0.6

53.6

6.5

169

-27

-0.5

54

6.6

174.24

-21.76

-0.4

54.4

6.7

179.56

-16.44

-0.3

54.8

6.8

184.96

-11.04

-0.2

55.2

6.9

190.44

-5.56

-0.1

55.6

6.99

195.4404

-0.5596

-0.01

55.96

6.999

195.944

-0.055996

-0.001

55.996

7

196

0

0

0

7.0001

196.0056

0.00560004

0.00010

56.0004

7.001

196.056

0.056004

0.001

56.004

7.01

196.5604

0.5604

0.01

56.04

7.1

201.64

5.64

0.1

56.4

7.2

207.36

11.36

0.2

56.8

7.3

213.16

17.16

0.3

57.2

7.4

219.04

23.04

0.4

57.6

7.5

225

29

0.5

58

7.6

231.04

35.04

0.6

58.4

7.7

237.16

41.16

0.7

58.8

7.9

249.64

53.64

0.9

59.6

7.99

255.3604

59.3604

0.99

59.96

7.999

255.936

59.936004

0.999

59.996

8

256

60

1

60

Power: 2

Coefficient: 2

Fixed point: 7

The gradient function for y = 2x2  is definitely m = 4x because the x values are four times smaller than the gradients. E.g. my x numeral is -7 and my gradient is -28, if I divide them I get 4.

...read more.

Conclusion

y = 4x. abandoned

My gradient function for y = 4x2  is 4x because if you the tables you will see that the gradients are four times bigger than there x values, an example of this x value -3 and gradient -12 as you can see -3 goes into -12 four times making the gradient function y = 4x.

My conclusion for y = x4  is gradient function is y = 3x2 .I got to this answer by noticing that my gradients for my x numerals were double but then I saw that the gradient was also three times larger than the x value also so at the end the slope must be y = 3x2 .

I can also predict the gradient function for y = x 5 .

Using this table I can predict that y = x^5 is gradient function y = 5x^3. As you can see 2 is the x value and the gradient is 40. To get to 40, you’ll need to cube the 2 and times by five and there you have your answer.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Gradient Function section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Gradient Function essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The Gradient Function Coursework

    5 star(s)

    found the relationship, but in the end I noticed that for this range of graphs y=ax� the gradient function will be m=3ax�. I think that this is enough research to find a relationship between these three ranges of graphs and their gradients.

  2. Maths Coursework - The Open Box Problem

    I constructed 3 graphs for each ratio. The ratios are 2: 1, 3: 1, 4: 1, and 5: 1. 2:1 These are the 3 cut out sizes I used for the 2:1 ratio rectangle. * 40:20 * 60:30 * 80:40 After deciding on the sizes I put them into an equation.

  1. Gradient Function

    0.01 35.97 5.999 107.964 0.035997 0.001 35.997 6 108 0 6.001 108.036 -0.036003 -0.001 36.003 6.01 108.3603 -0.3603 -0.01 36.03 6.1 111.63 -3.63 -0.1 36.3 6.2 115.32 -7.32 -0.2 36.6 6.3 119.07 -11.07 -0.3 36.9 6.4 122.88 -14.88 -0.4 37.2 6.5 126.75 -18.75 -0.5 37.5 6.6 130.68 -22.68 -0.6 37.8

  2. The Gradient Function

    1.5 2 3 -2 Gradient 2 3 4 6 -4 I checked this on Omnigraph but these gradients weren't right. These were the correct ones below. For the curve y=x�, the gradient of the tangent at x:- Tangent at x 1 1.5 2 3 -2 x2 1 2.25 4 9

  1. The Gradient Function

    Gradients: L1: Gradient at point X= 1 Y2-Y1 X2-X1 = 1.225 - 0.75 = -0.95 0.75-1.25 L2: Gradient at point X= -2 Y2-Y1 X2-X1 = -0.625-(-0.375) = -0.25 -1.5-(-2.5) L3: Gradient at point X = -1 Y2-Y1 X2-X1 = -1.25-(-0.75)

  2. The Gradient Function

    point x=2: y1 = 23 y1 = 8 x2 = 1.001 y2 = 2.0013 y2 = 8.012006001 G = y1-y2 x1-x2 G = 12.006001 G = 12 For point x=3: y1 = 33 y1 = 27 x2 = 1.001 y2 = 3.0013 y2 = 27.027009001 G = y1-y2 x1-x2 G

  1. The Gradient Function

    answer I could speculate that the gradient of the curve at this point could be 8. Just to ensure this, I could 'zoom in' to the graph further and apply the same method above to the point 2.001: 8.008002-8/2.001-2 = 8.002 Bearing in mind that as you 'zoom in' to

  2. The Gradient Function.

    g=c� you can work out the Y co-ordinate. In this case you would do 3.01*3.01, which would be the same as 3.01�. This then gives you the value 9.0601. Now that you have those values you know that the line must cross the point (3,9) and the point (3.01,9.0601).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work