• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hidden faces are those hidden after the cubes have been viewed from all angles.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HIDDEN FACES

Hidden Faces: Hidden faces are those hidden after the cubes have been viewed from all angles.

Introduction: I am investigating the number of hidden faces for other cuboids made from cubes. I will use visual representation to display my results in the form of graphs. I will collect my results in a table. I will start to collect my information in my table starting with one cube and building them up into rows and different sized cuboids. At the end of my investigation I hope to have a formula worked out, and also I hope to be able to find the number of hidden faces on a cuboids made up from 30 cubes.

Collecting Data: I have drawn a table to record my results. In the first column I have the number of cubes and in the second I have the number of hidden faces. In my table I have found the hidden faces for every one cube put down there is one hidden face on the bottom.

...read more.

Middle

The Differences: In this sequence (using the number of hidden faces from my table) the difference between them is +3. So what ever my formula turns out to be it must have a 3 in it. If I use ‘N’ as representing the number of cubes. My formula looks like this ‘3N’ or 3xN. So If a number of cubes are put into my formula it will go through like this. image02.pngimage03.png

                                            X                                           =image04.pngimage05.png

image06.png

Prediction: I predict that if I put a 9 and then a 7 into my formula. 9 cubes will have 27 hidden faces. And if I put 7 cubes into my formula there will be 21 hidden faces.

The Final Piece: If I put a 9 into my formula it gives me 3x9=27. And if I put a 7 in it will come out like this 3x7 =21. So my prediction was right but if you count the number of hidden faces without using the formula 9 cubes has 25 hidden faces and 7 cubes has 19 hidden faces. So each time the number of hidden faces is -2 more than I predicted.

...read more.

Conclusion

18 cubes stacked = 3.5  x 18 = 63

So my formula so far is wrong. Because each time I put in a number of cubes the number of hidden faces is four more than I predicted. Each time I am having to – 4 each time to get the right number of hidden faces. My formula is now complete and looks like this 3.5n – 4.To prove this I am going to input different amounts of cubes.

26 stacked cubes = 3.5 x 26 = 91

                                  91 – 4 = 86 hidden faces

30 stacked cubes = 3.5 x 30 = 105

                                 105 – 4 = 101 hidden faces

36 stacked cubes = 3.5 x 36 = 126

                                 126 – 4 = 122 hidden faces

So my second formula also works. My second way of working it out like I did for cubes in a row which is 6n – S this also works using stacked cubes

Conclusion: In conclusion my investigation shows how my formulas help to find the number of hidden faces. My first formula works only for cubes in a row. My second formula only works for cubes stacked two high in a line. But the amazing thing is that the formula that works for both is the other way of working out the number of hidden faces 6n- S. This formula involves a lot more working out but can be effective if used.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hidden Faces and Cubes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hidden Faces and Cubes essays

  1. An investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes (starting with triangles, ...

    I will first write out the maximum perimeter for shapes made of 10 triangles, 10 squares and 10 hexagons below. Although the number of shapes is a constant value, I am putting this into the table as I am sure that the number of shapes will have to be taken into account in the formula.

  2. Cubes and Cuboids Investigation.

    of the others are based upon using formulae that are not on the corner of the cube and so involve taking two from the length but as there is only a length of one you can't minus two away. The only thing that you can say about this size cube

  1. Maths-hidden faces

    You don't multiply the first bracket (W x L) by 2 because the faces on the base of the cuboid are hidden-the side of the cuboid that touches the table. The longer the length of a cuboid, the more hidden faces, and less showing faces it has. The shorter the length, the less hidden faces, and more showing faces it has.

  2. Mathematics GCSE - Hidden Faces.

    I will now test 3n-2 to show that it is correct. I can see that 3(n is 3(6 and then I will minus 2. So 3(6-2 = 16, which is correct, so I now know that the formula is correct.

  1. Maths Project : Cubes and Hidden Faces

    3 Now I will be drawing the shapes as above but I will be putting it on its side to see if that will change the results. 2 Cubes = 3 hidden faces 4 cubes = 10 hidden faces 6 cubes = 17 Hidden faces 8 cubes = 24 hidden

  2. I am doing an investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes ...

    If I were to change the formula to H=(P+2D-2)/4, I have a pretty good idea that this would work. If it did, it could then be rearranged to give P= and D=. I will now test the formula H=(P+2D-2)/4, in exactly the same way as above, but omitting P= and D= to save time.

  1. shapes investigation coursework

    the same (although underneath they still do exactly the same as before), it is obvious that the only difference between them is the amount that they are divided by (i.e. /1, /2 and /4). But why are these 'divided by' amounts different?

  2. Shapes Investigation I will try to find the relationship between the perimeter (in cm), ...

    Q or H for X, which will represent all or any of the shapes. So the formulas I have are: T=P+2D-2, Q=P/2+D-1 and H=(P+2D-2)/4. I think that to get my universal formula, I need to have all these three in the same 'format'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work