• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 2359

I am going to investigate different sized cubes, made up of single unit rods and justify formulae for the number of rods and joints in the cubes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Higher Tier Coursework

Structures – 2003

Owen Gates
Introduction

I am going to investigate different sized cubes, made up of single unit rods and justify formulae for the number of rods and joints in the cubes. The cubes are made from single unit rods and are not hollow, meaning that the unit rods are constructed inside the cube making smaller, similar cubes inside of the default one. The only cube not to be made up of smaller cubes, will be the 1x1x1 cube as this is the simplest form of cube and will, therefore not have any unit rods inside it. An example of a 2x2x2 cube is shown below.

The individual unit rods in the structure are held together by a series of different types of joints, as shown below.

3 joints – found on the vertices of the cube and       connect three different rods together.

4joints – found on the edges of the cube and connect four different rods together

5 joints – found on the faces of the cube and connect five different rods together

6 joints – found on the inside of the cube and connect six different rods together. Without using diagonals, this is the most amount of rods to join together.

...read more.

Middle

= 24 + 48n-48 +(30n-30)(n-1) + (6n-6)(n-1)(n-1)

                                      2

= 24 + 48n-48 + 30n2–60n+30 + (6n2-12n+6)(n-1)

                                     2image02.png

= 24 + 48n-48 + 30n2 –60n+30 + 6n3-12n2+6n-6n2+12n-6

                                           2image03.png

= 6n3+30n2-12n2-6n2+48n-60n+6n+12n+24-48+30-6image04.png

                                        2

= 6n3 + 12n2 +6nimage05.png

             2

= 3n3 + 6n2 +3n

=3n(n2+2n+1)

=3n(n+1)(n+1)

=3n(n+1) 2

Therefore the final formula for the number of cubes = 3n(n+1) 2

Prediction and Justifying Formulae

I can now use my formulae to predict what the results would be in a 6x6x6 cube. If my formulae are correct then the cube would have 8 3joints, 60 4 joints, 150 5 joints, 125 6 joints and 882 unit rods.

(See spotty paper for prediction)

nxnxn

3 joints

4 joints

5 joints

6 joints

No. of rods

1x1x1

8

0

0

0

12

2x2x2

8

12

6

1

54

3x3x3

8

24

24

8

144

4x4x4

8

36

54

27

300

5x5x5

8

48

96

64

540

6x6x6

8

60

150

125

882

I can see that my prediction was correct and therefore my formulae are correct.

= image06.png

image07.png

Cuboidsimage01.pngimage01.pngimage01.pngimage00.png

(All working is on spotty paper at the back of this investigation)

Working and Results

        By looking at the spotty paper and counting the number of rods and joints, I have produced the following table.

xxyxz

3 joints

4 joints

5 joints

6 joints

No. of rods

1x2x3

8

12

4

0

46

2x3x4

8

24

22

6

133

2x4x6

8

36

46

15

244

1x2x9

8

36

16

0

124

4x5x6

8

48

94

60

1046

...read more.

Conclusion

I can now state that what I set out to investigate has been successful and the discovered formulae are presented in the following tables.

Cubes

Type of joint/ rods

Formulae

Number of unit rods

3n(n+1) 2

Number of 3 joints

8

Number of 4 joints

12(n-1)

Number of 5 joints

6(n-1) 2

Number of 6 joints

(n-1) 3

Cuboids

Type of joint/ rods

Formulae

Number of unit rods

3xyz+2xy+2xz+2yz+x+y+z

Number of 3 joints

8

Number of 4 joints

4(x+y+z-3)

Number of 5 joints

2(x-1)(y-1)+2(x-1)(z-1)+2(y-1)(z-1)

Number of 6 joints

(x-1)(y-1)(z-1)

These formulae have been justified as being correct

If I was to improve my investigation I could have used line graphs for each of the discovered formulae and then used the gradient of the line and the point at which it cuts the y-axis to justify my formulae furthermore. This would have only strengthened my argument that my formulae are correct and I would have found any additional evidence. Therefore I can conclude that my investigation was successful and my formulae are accurate.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hidden Faces and Cubes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hidden Faces and Cubes essays

  1. An investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes (starting with triangles, ...

    For example, the formulas always give a value of Q to be twice its real value, and the value of P is always less than its real value by whatever Q is. So, in theory, all I need to do to get a working formula for Q= is to change the formula from Q=P+2D-2 to Q=(P+2D-2)/2, or more simply Q=P/2+D-1.

  2. Cubes and Cuboids Investigation.

    cubes in the middle will also form a cube, therefore we can say that the formula is going to be Y=(X-2)3. 'font-size:14.0pt; '>Here is a table showing all of the formulae that go together to show how the different number of faces painted on the small cubes are arranged: Number of painted faces Formula 0 Y=(X-2)3 1 Y=(X-2)2*6 2 Y=12(X-2)

  1. shapes investigation coursework

    4 16 28 3 16 30 2 16 32 1 16 34 0 16 Firstly I will test my previous formulas, P=T+2-2D, D=(T+2-P)/2 and T= P+2D-2, to see if they hold true - of course, substituting T with Q. If the formulas still hold true, I will be able to

  2. GCSE Maths Coursework - Shapes Investigation

    Therefore, I should be able to swap the /1, /2 and /4 in the triangle, square and hexagon formulas respectively with (Y-2), to give the formula X=(P+2D-2)/(Y-2). As this is quite a complex formula in comparison to previous ones I have found, I feel it would be wise to test

  1. I am doing an investigation to look at shapes made up of other shapes ...

    10 13 Squares (Q=10): P= D= T= 16 6 13 18 5 13 20 4 13 22 3 13 24 2 13 26 1 13 28 0 13 16 Squares (Q=16): P= D= T= 16 9 16 18 8 16 20 7 16 22 6 16 24 5 16 26

  2. Shapes Investigation I will try to find the relationship between the perimeter (in cm), ...

    derived from is fine - I will test them just to make sure. There is no reason mathematically why the formulas should not work, unless there is no or irregular correlation between P, D and Q, but testing will iron out any mistakes I may have made.

  1. gcse maths shapes investigation

    by -8 Q=16+18-2 � Q=32 DQ is out by +16, or +Q From these trials it is clear that the formulas for triangles doesn't work properly, but there is some correlation which could help me to find a formula for squares.

  2. mathsI will try to find the correlations between the perimeter (in cm), dots enclosed ...

    10 13 Squares (Q=10): P= D= T= 16 6 13 18 5 13 20 4 13 22 3 13 24 2 13 26 1 13 28 0 13 16 Squares (Q=16): P= D= T= 16 9 16 18 8 16 20 7 16 22 6 16 24 5 16 26

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work