I have been given the equation y = axn to investigate the gradient function for varied values of "a" and "n".
I have been given the equation y = axn to investigate the gradient function for varied values of "a" and "n"
Firstly I will choose n = 1 for varied values of a
When n = 1 then the graph will be a straight line
The general equation of a straight line is y = ax
I am going to keep n constant and use varied values for "a".The gradient for a straight line remains the same, therefore I am going to calculate the gradient by taking the difference in the y co-ordinates divided by the difference in x co-ordinates.
In order to calculate the gradient for a straight line we will have to go through the process of calculating the gradient by taking the difference in y co-ordinates divided by the difference in the x co-ordinates.
I would then choose n = 2 for varying values of a where a = 1,2,3,4
The equations would be ; y = x2 , y = 2x2 , y = 3x2 , y = 4x2
These equations would get us curved graphs and the gradient function at each point in a
curve is different therefore I will draw tangents using a capillary tube and calculate the
gradient by taking the change in the value of the y co ordinates divided by the change in t
value of the x co ordinates.
I would then choose n = 3 for varying values of "a".
The equations would be ; y = x3, y = 2x3,y = 3x3.
Again these equations would get me curved graphs and I will establish a relationship
Between the curve and the gradient.
In order to calculate the gradient in a curve , we know we have to draw the tangent for a
given point x and then calculate the gradient.
The gradient can be calculated by the change in the y co-ordinates divided by the change in the x co-ordinates.
I will now draw graphs for the equations I stated above:
Using a capillary tube I am going to draw tangents.
In order to draw the tangents using a capillary tube we have to keep the capillary tube on the curve and keep it at different points to check if it is straight and if it is we draw the normal and perpendicular to the normal we draw tha tangent and calculate the gradient.
Graph 1)y=x
Graph 2)y=2x
Graph3)y=3x
Graph 4)y=4x
Graph 5)y=x2
Graph 6)y=2x2
Graph 7)y=3x2
Graph 8)y=4x2
Graph 9)y=x3
Graph 10)y=2x3
Graph 11)y=3x3
Graph 12)y=4x³
The tables for the gradients of the graphs are as shown below
For the equations when n = 1 the gradients were as follows:
a =
2
3
4
Curve
y=x
y=2x
y=3x
y=4x
Gradient function
2
3
4
I have found that the gradient for the graph ;
y=x is 1,
y=2x is 2,
y=3x is 3,
y=4x is 4,
Therefore it is clear here that the gradient of the graph of y=ax1 is a
Testing:Graph 12
For the graph of y = 5x the gradient function according to the relation I have established should be 5.Let us try drawing the graph and finding out the gradient.
At (4,20)(5,25)
Gradient function = ?y / ?x
=25-20
5-4
= 5
the table for the equations when n = 2 are as shown below
A
2
3
Curve
y=x2
y=2x2
y=3x2
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
Gradient function
4.2
5.5
8
8.4
1.67
6
1.6
7.69
24.28
I would like to establish a relationship between the curve and the gradient,therefore I will be rounding the answers I have obtained from the graphs to the nearest whole number as it would be a tedious process to do the calculations with decimals.
Curve
y = x2
y = 2x2
y = 3x2
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
Gradient from curve =
4.2
5.5
8
8.4
1.67
6
1.6
7.69
24.28
?
4
6
8
8
2
6
2
8
24
I would like to establish a relationship between the curve and the gradient
When y = x2 and a = 1 ,the gradients are as follows:0
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
Gradient function
4
6
8
From the table I can see that the gradient function is twice the point at which we draw the tangents .
Gradient function = 2x
For the curve y = 2x2,the gradients are as follows,
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
Gradient function
8
2
6
As we can see from the table above the gradient function is 4 multiplied by the point at which we draw the tangent at.Thus I can say that the gradient function for the curve of y=2x² is 4x.
For the curve y=3x²
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
Gradient function
2
8
24
I can see that the gradient function is 6 multiplied by the point at which we draw the tangent.
Thus I can conclude from this table that the gradient function for the curve = 6x
After looking at the tables for the various values of "a" and how they are related to the gradient function I have come to the conclusion that the gradient function for the general equation y = ax² is 2ax
Testing:-
y = 7x2
Gradient function for the tangent x = 2 is 2(7*22) is equal to 56.
Gradient function for the tangent x = 3 is 2(7*32) is equal to 126
The table for the graphs when n = 2 is as shown below:
a =
2
3
y =
x3
2x3
3x3
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
Gradient
2.22
26.6
47.5
24
54
96
36
81
44
Again I would like to establish a ...
This is a preview of the whole essay
Gradient function for the tangent x = 3 is 2(7*32) is equal to 126
The table for the graphs when n = 2 is as shown below:
a =
2
3
y =
x3
2x3
3x3
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
Gradient
2.22
26.6
47.5
24
54
96
36
81
44
Again I would like to establish a relationship between the curve and the gradient.
Therefore I will be rounding the gradients to the nearest whole numbers,
When y = x3 and a = 1 the tangents and their respective gradients are as follows:
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
Gradient function
2
27
48
Tangent at x =
2
Gradient function
2
The factors for 12 are :
2 X 1
6 X 2
3 X 4
Therefore 4 can be written as 2² and 4 X 3 gives 12,thus I can conclude that the equation is 3x²
Tangent at x =
3
Gradient function=
27
The equation I concluded in the earlier table is 3x² and when we use it here I get 3(3²) which is = 27
When y =2 x3 and the tangents and their respective gradients are as follows:
Tangent at x =
2
3
4
Gradient function
24
54
96
Again I am going to establish a relationship between the tangent and the gradient.
For the previous tables I had established the relation which was 3x².
Therefore if I substitute the values of the tangent in this equation ; at 2 , the gradient function = 3(2²)=12.
Therefore if I multiply this by the point at which we draw the tangent we get the correct gradient function.
For the tangent at x = 3 , 3 X 3(3²) = 54
Therefore the equation is correct which is 3ax²
y =
x³
2x³
3x³
Gradient function
3x²
6x²
9x²
Testing:
y =6x3
Gradient function for the tangent at x = 2 is 3(6*22 ) is equal to 72
Gradient function for the tangent at x = 3 is 3(6*32) is equal to 162
Therefore after looking at the tables for the various cubic functions I have arrived at the conclusion that the general gradient function for the graph of y = x³ is 3ax²
I would like to extend my investigation to the following :
i) y = ?ax ?b
y=2x+3
y=3x+5
y=3x-5
y=-2x+5
The gradient for a straight line remains the same at all points.
y = 2x+3
Gradient function=
2
y = 3x+5
Gradient function
3
Y=3x-5
Gradient function
3
Testing:
I will now test for the line y = -2x+5 ,and according to the formula the gradient should be equal to -2
After drawing the graph for y=-2x+5 I have arrived at the following results:
Y=-2x+5
Gradient function
-2
I have arrived at the conclusion that the gradient function is = ?a
Therefore the gradient function for the general equation , y= ?ax ?b is = ?a
ii) y = ?ax² ? b
y=2x2+5
y=4x²-5
y=2x²+3
The gradient function for the curves I have stated above are as follows:
)Y=2x²+5
Tangent at x =
2
3
Gradient function
8
2
The gradient functions are the same as the ones for the curve of 2x² , therefore I have arrived at the conclusion that the gradient function for the general equation of y = ? ax ?b is ?2ax.
iii) y = ?ax² ? bx
y=2x²+x
y=2x²+3x
y=x²+1/4x
The gradient functions for the equations I have stated above are as follows:
For y=2x²+x
Tangent at x =
2
3
Gradient
9
3
For y=2x²+3x
Tangent at x =
2
3
Gradient
1
5
I would like to establish a relation between the gradient function and the point at which we draw the tangents,therefore again I will be rounding my answers to the gradient functions to the nearest whole numbers as these answers would be much more easier to work with.
For y=2x²+x;
The gradient function for the curve of y = 2x² was 2ax,
In the curve of y=2x² , the tangent draw at 2 gave us the gradient function of 8.
Therefore in the equation y=2x²+x the answer for the gradient function we arrive at is 9 thus I can see that as a = 1 , if we add this 1 to the answer , we get the gradient function we arrived at from the curve of y=2x²+x
Therefore I have arrived at the conclusion that the gradient function is 2ax+b
Testing:
For the curve y=2x²+x ,if we draw the tangent at 4 , the gradient function I should
arrive at is 2(2)(4)+1=17 which is correct.
iv)y = ?ax³+?bx²
y=x³+x²
y=x³-2x²
y=3x³+2x²
For y=x³+x²
Tangent at x =
2
3
Gradient function
6
33
For y=x³-2x²
Tangent at x =
2
3
Gradient function
4
5
For y=3x³+2x²
Tangent at x =
2
3
Gradient function
44
93
The Increament Method
It can be used to find the gradient of a tangent to a curve but if the tangent is just drawn by eye the value obtained can only be an approximation
A more precise method is needed for determining the gradient of a curve whose equation is known so that further analysis can be made of the properties of such a curve
Lets consider a problem of finding the gradient of a tangent at a point A on the curve
If B is another point on the curve,fairly close to A then the gradient of the chord AB gives an approximate value for the gradient of the tangent at A.As B gets nearer to A the chord AB gets closer to the tangent at A so the approximation becomes more accurate.
So as B gets closer and closer to A we can say that the gradient of the the chord AB gets closer to the gradient of the tangent at A
Taking for example the equation y = x2 where the gradient function = 2x,
I would like to calculate the gradient function at x = 2 using the small increament method using my calculator
x
.1
.05
.01
.001
.0001
.00001
y=x2
.21
.1025
.0201
.002001
.00020001
.00002
Change in y
0.21
.1025
.0201
.002001
.00020001
.00002
Change in x
.1
.05
.01
.001
.0001
.00001
Gradient function
2.1
2.05
2.01
2.001
2.0001
2
Gradient function at x = 3
x
3.1
3.05
3.01
3.001
3.0001
3.00001
y=x2
9.61
9.3025
9.0601
9.006001
9.00060001
9.00006
Change in y
0.61
.3025
.0601
.006001
.00060001
.00006
Change in x
.1
.05
.01
.001
.0001
.00001
Gradient function
6.1
6.05
6.01
6.001
6.0001
6
As the procedure using the caluculator is very tedious and since I am well versed with Microsoft Excel and calculations can be done quite easily using its functions I would like
to proceed using Microsoft Excel.
Gradient function at x = 4 Using Ms Excel 2000
x
4.1
4.05
4.01
4.001
4.0001
4.00001
y=x²
6.81
6.4025
6.0801
6.008
6.0008
6.00008
change in y
0.81
0.4025
0.0801
0.008
0.0008
0.00008
change in x
0.1
0.05
0.01
0.001
0.0001
0.00001
gradient function
8.1
8.05
8.01
8
8
8
After finding out the gradient function using the increment method I have come to the conclusion that the relation I had found earlier from the graphs holds true
Therefore the gradient function of the graph of y=x² is 2ax
Looking at the curve of y=x³,I will now use the small increment method to get the gradient function at x=2,again using microsoft excel 2000
x
2.1
2.05
2.01
2.001
2.0001
2.00001
2.00001
2.000001
y=x³
9.261
8.615125
8.120601
8.012006
8.0012
8.00012
8.00012
8.000012
change in y
.261
0.615125
0.120601
0.012006
0.0012
0.00012
0.00012
.2E-05
change in x
0.1
0.05
0.01
0.001
0.0001
E-05
E-05
E-06
Gradient function
2.61
2.3025
2.0601
2.006
2.0006
2.00006
2.00006
2.00001
Looking at the curve of y=x³,I will now use the small increment method to get the gradient function at x=3.
X
3.1
3.05
3.01
3.001
3.0001
3.00001
3.000001
y=x³
29.791
28.37263
27.2709
27.02701
27.0027
27.00027
27.00003
change in y
2.791
.372625
0.270901
0.027009
0.0027
0.00027
2.7E-05
change in x
0.1
0.05
0.01
0.001
0.0001
E-05
E-06
Gradient function
27.91
27.4525
27.0901
27.009
27.0009
27.00009
27.00001
Looking at the curve y=x³,I will now use the small increment method to get the gradient function at x=4
x
4.1
4.05
4.01
4.001
4.0001
4.00001
4.000001
4
y=x³
68.921
66.43013
64.4812
64.04801
64.0048
64.00048
64.00005
64
change in y
4.921
2.430125
0.481201
0.048012
0.0048
0.00048
4.8E-05
4.8E-06
change in x
0.1
0.05
0.01
0.001
E-04
E-05
E-06
E-07
Gradient function
49.21
48.6025
48.1201
48.012
48.0012
48.00012
48.00001
48
The gradient function I had concluded earlier from the graphs holds true as the small increment method and the answers from the graph remain the same , therefore the gradient function for the graph of y=2x² is 2ax
Looking the curve of y=2x²
At the point where x = 2
x
2.1
2.05
2.01
2.001
2.0001
2.00001
2.000001
y=2x²
8.82
8.405
8.0802
8.008002
8.0008
8.00008
8.000008
change in y
0.82
0.405
0.0802
0.008002
0.0008
8E-05
8E-06
change in x
0.1
0.05
0.01
0.001
0.0001
E-05
E-06
Gradient function
8.2
8.1
8.02
8.002
8.0002
8.00002
8.000002
Gradient function at x = 3 for the curve of y=2x²
x
3.1
3.05
3.01
3.001
3.0001
3.00001
3.000001
y=2x²
9.22
8.605
8.1202
8.012
8.0012
8.00012
8.00001
change in y
1.22
0.605
0.1202
0.012
0.0012
0.00012
0.00001
change in x
.1
.05
.01
.001
.0001
.00001
.000001
Gradient function
0.2
0.1
0.02
0.002
0.0002
0.00002
0
Gradient function at x = 4 for the curve of y = 2x²
X
4.1
4.05
4.01
4.001
4.0001
4.00001
4.000001
Y=2x²
33.62
32.805
32.1602
32.016
32.0016
32.00016
32.00002
change in y
25.62
24.805
24.1602
24.016
24.0016
24.00016
24.00002
change in x
2.1
2.05
2.01
2.001
2.0001
2.00001
2.000001
Gradient function
2.2
2.1
2.02
2.002
2.0002
2.00002
2
Therefore I have arrived at the conclusion that :
For y=
Gradient function =
ax
a
ax²
2ax
ax³
3ax²
ax4
4ax³
axn
naxn-1
Therefore using the increment method to find the gradient function for the tangents in polynomial functions ,
For the graph of :y=2x²+5,my gradient function is 2ax
For the graph of :y=2x²+3x,my gradient function is axn+bx
For the graph of :y=3x³+2x²,my gradient function is 3ax²+2bx
Therefore I can conclude that the gradient function for the general equation y = axp + bxq
If we want to find the gradient function of a polynomial equation the gradient function of the first term added to the gradient function of the second term should give u the gradient function of the polynomial equation.
Example: y = x² + 2x
The gradient function for the curve of y = x² is 2ax
And the gradient function for y=2x is 2,
Therefore the gradient function for the equation y = x² + 2x is 2x + 2
DIFFERENCIATION:
By constant reference on calculus it is equally clear that it is much too tedious to go through this process each time we want the gradient at just one point on just one curve and so we need a more general and theoritical method.For this we use a general point A(x,y) and a variable small change in the values of x between a and b and calcualte the gradient function algebraically.
A new symbol ? is used to denote a small change.
When ? appears as a prefix to any letter representing a variable quantity , it denotes a small increase in that quantity
e.g : ? x means a small increase in the value of x
? y means a small increase in the value of y
? t means a small increase in the value of t
Note that ? is a prefix.It does not have any independent value and and cannot be treated as a factor.
The gradient of PQ is given by : mpq = (y+?x)_-y
(x+?x)-x
Therefore mpq=?y
?x
As ?x tends to zero(?x 0) ?y approaches the value of the gradient at the tangent line
?x
at P.This value is referred to as the limiting value of ?y and is written as
?x
lim (?x tends to 0) = ?y
?x
The limiting value of ?y is called differential co-efficient or is also referred to as first
?x
derivatives of y with respect to x and is denoted by dy
dx
This process of finding the limiting value is called Differentiation
Now consider again the gradient of the curve with the equation y = x²
This time we will look for the gradient at any point A(x,y) on the curve and use a point B where the x co-ordinates of B is x +?x
For any point on the curve y = x²
So at B , the y co-ordinate is (x+?x)²
= x²+2x?x+(?x)²
Therefore the gradient of the chord AB which is given by ?x / ?x is
(x+?x)²-x²
(x+?x)-x
= 2x?x+(?x)²
8x
=2x + 8x
Now as B tends to A , ?x tends to 0 , therefore
Gradient of curve at a = limit(as b tends to a)
{gradient of chord ab)
=limit (gradient of chord ab)
as ? tends to 0
=limit (2x+?x)
as ?x tends to 0
Gradient function = 2x
This result can now be used to give the gradient at any point on the curve with the equation y = x² where the x co-ordinate is given ,e.g:
At the point where x = 3,
Gradient = 2x
=2(3)
=6
At the point (4,6)
Gradient = 2x
=2(4)
= 8
Looking back at the longer method we used to find gradient at the point where x = 1 we see that the value obtained there is confirmed by using the general result
The process of finding a general expression for the gradient of a curve at any point is called differentiation.
The general gradient expression for a curve y=f(x) is itself a function so it is called the gradient function.For the curve y=x² as we found out above the gradient function is 2x
Because the gradient function is derived from the given function,it is more often called the derived function or the derivative.
The method used above in which the limit of the gradient of a chord was used to find the derived function is know as differentiating from first principles.It is the fundamental way in which the gradient of each new type of function is found,although many shortcuts can be developed,it is important to understand this basic method
FOR 2X³:
Gradient = 2(x+?x)³-2x³
x+?x-x
= 2 [x³+3x²(?x)+3x(?x)²+(?x)³]-2x³
?x
=2x³+6x²(?x)+6x(?x)²+2(?x)³-2x³
?x
=?x[6x²+6x(?x)+2(?x)²]
?x
Limit ?x tends to 0
Gradient function = 6x²
By differentiating again by first principles I am going to find the gradient function of the expression y = x³+6.
Let C and D be two neighbouring points on the curve where C is the point (x,y) and the x co-ordinate of B is x+?x
Therefore at C y= x³+6
And at D y = (x+?x)³+6
The gradient of chord CD is {(x+?x)³+6}-{x³+5}
{x+?x}-x
which gives us x³+3x²?x+3x?x²+?x³+6-x³+6
x+?x-x
which results to give us 3x²?x+3x?x²+?x³
x+?x-x
=?x(3x²+3x?x+?x²)
?x
which again results in 3x²+3x?x+(?x)²
The gradient of the curve at A=limit(as?x tends to 0 ) {3x²+3x?x+(?x)²}
=3x²
Therefore if we test for the point (2,14)
x =2 , so the gradient is 3(2)² = 12
I would now like to generalise my results
Therefore I will be differentiating a linear function of x
The graph of the equation y=kx where k is a constant is a straight line with the gradient k
Hence d_(kx)=k
dx
Now if we apply the general rule for differentiating xn to y = x
i.e to y = xl = 1x0 = 1
Combining these two facts shows us that
This conclusion applies in fact to a constant multiple of any function of x,e.g
If y = 3x5,dy=3 X 5x4 = 15x4
dx
and if y=4x-2 , dy = 4 X -2x-3 = -8x-3
dx
In general then if a is a constant
THE GENERAL GRADIENT FUNCTION:
Using calculus I would like to calculate the gradient function for the equation y = f(x)
Taking two points on the curve A(x,y) and B(x+?x,y+?y) we have,
At A y= f(x) and at b y+?y=f(x+?x)
Therefore the gradient function of AB is given by
Now as ?x tends to 0,?y/?x tends to dy/dx therefore in general
I would like to further extend my investigation to trignometric graphs,
The co-ordiantes for the graph of y=sin x
X
-180
-90
0
90
80
Y
0
-1
0
0
The table for the graph of the curve of sin x versus the gradient function is as follows:
y =sin x
x
-180
-90
0
90
80
270
360
Gradient function
-1
0
0
-1
0
After referring to some books on differentiation I have decided to plot the graph of the gradient function I have calculated versus my values of x.
d(sinx)=cos x
dx
The co-ordinates for the graph of y = cos x is as follows:
x
-180
-90
0
90
80
y
-1
0
0
-1
For the graph of y=cos x
x
-180
-90
0
90
80
270
360
Gradient function
0
0
-1
0
0
Again I have chosen to plot the graph of the gradient function against the values of x
I have arrived at the conclusion that
d(cos x )= -sin x
dx
I am now going to further extend my investigation and draw graphs for exponenial functions.
Graph of y=2x is as shown below:
Let P(x,y) and Q(x+?x,x+?y) be two near by points on the curve of y = 2x then
y + ?y = 2x+?x
y = 2x+?x-y
=2x+?x-2x
Therefore ?y=2x(2?x-1)
This gives : ?y= 2x(2?x-1)
?x ?x
Now dy= limit (?x tends to 0) [dy/dx]
dx
Therefore we have :
dy=lim(?x tends to 0) [2x(2?x-1)]
dx ?x
Taking small values for ?x and using the calculator it appears that
Lim(?x tends to 0) (2?x-1) ? 0.693
?x
Therefore d_ (3x) = 3x X lim(3?x-1)
dx (?x tends to 0) ?x
Taking small values for ?x and again using the calculator it appears that
Lim (3?x-1) ?1.099
(?x tends to 0) ?x
Therefore d_ (3x) ? 1.099 X 3
dx
From the above calculations we can see that in the case of y=2x the gradient of the curve y=2x the gradient of the curve is less than y=2x whereas in case of y=3x the gradient of the curve is greater than y=3x.In fact there exists an exponential function y=ex such that the gradient function equals y=ex
From my investigation above I cans see that 2<a<3.In fact e = 2.71828 correct to 5 decimal places.The value of e is irrational.
The function y=ex is called the exponential function and
dy = ex
dx
The graph of y = ex is shown below :
In general :
d(eax)_= aeax
dx
I started with drawing the graphs and then calculating the gradient by drawing the tangents using a capillary tube after which I had to work out relations for between the gradient function and the point at which we draw the tangent which was a very tedious and time consuming process.
I then proceeded using the small increment method which was an effective method but again was a very tedious process.
After constant reference to advance level math books I came into the topic of differentiation which was a little complicated but was more effective as I was able to find out the derivative which simplifies everything.
I have thus come to the conclusion that calculus is the best way to investigate the gradient function of any graph.