• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2475

I plan to investigate whether there is a correlation between height and wrist circumference of UK males.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Plan

Investigation 1: I plan to investigate whether there is a correlation between height and wrist circumference of UK males.

Hypothesise

Null Hypothesis: There is no correlation between the height and wrist circumference of UK Males

Alternate Hypothesis: There is a positive correlation between the height and wrist circumference of UK Males

In order to try to prove or disprove these hypothesise I will construct a scatter graph using Excel©. Excel is a computer program that is easy and clear to understand. On the scatter graph I have decided to put a line of best fit because this will demonstrate graphically a correlation if present. On Excel the line of best fit will be perfectly constructed.

As stated in my introduction I will get my database from a census at school. In doing this it will save time on collecting the results and the results will be reliable. For this investigation I will get 500 data entries. If I plotted all 500 data entries on one graph then it would be illegible. For this reason I plan to only use 20 data entries.

To select the 20 entries I will use random sampling. First I will number my 500 data entries from 1-500.  I will then use the RANDOM key on my calculator.

Middle

0

0

9

5.5%

11

1

10

17%

34

3

11

18%

36

6

12

22.5%

45

10

13

16.5%

33

11

14

12.5%

25

7

15

8%

16

2

16

0%

0

0

17

0%

0

0

Cumulative Frequency Tables

 Height Frequency Cumulative Frequency 130 ≤ h < 140 2 2 140 ≤ h < 150 5 7 150 ≤ h < 160 15 22 160 ≤ h < 170 14 36 170 ≤ h < 180 4 40

UK

Australia

 Height Frequency Cumulative Frequency 130 ≤ h < 140 1 1 140 ≤ h < 150 5 6 150 ≤ h < 160 12 18 160 ≤ h < 170 14 32 170 ≤ h < 180 8 40

Investigation 2

Analysis

I have now drawn up my cumulative frequency graphs for both Australian and British Males. My original hypothesise were:

Null Hypothesis: There will not be a difference between the Median height of Australian men and that of British men.

The shortest person was British and the tallest was Australian. However the Inter-quartile range was smaller in the British population. The advantage of the inter-quartile range is that it eliminates wild and uncharacteristic results. This means that the Australian population had more variation in size and that they deviate more from the median than the British population. This result tells me that the Australian population may just have a few very tall people, skewing the results.

Conclusion

158.5

Investigation 3

Analysis

I have now drawn my histograms for both UK males and females height my original hypothesise were:

Null Hypothesis: There will not be a difference between the Mean height of UK Males and that of UK Females.

Alternate Hypothesis: The Mean height of UK Males will be higher than that of UK Females.

The Histograms clearly demonstrate that the average height for UK Males is larger than that of UK Females. I can tell that this is true because the mean value for UK males is 164cm whereas the mean height for UK females is 158.5cm. This is quite a large difference. The alternate hypothesis has been proved to be correct.

For females the highest frequency density was in the 160 ≤ h < 170 category as it was 2.5. This would be the modal average for UK females. For males the highest frequency density was in the 170 ≤ h < 180 category as it was 1.9. This would be the modal average for UK males. Another indication that UK males are in average larger than that of UK females.

I think that in general Investigation 3 went successfully. Using a histogram allowed me to use group of different interval width because area demonstrates group size not height.  The stratified sampling of the data was a much fairer method than random sampling because it ensured that the same age group from each population was represented.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

1. A hypothesis is the outline of the idea/ideas which I will be testing and ...

to 160 which I believe is slightly above average in my honest opinion for my sample and also I have come to find that the trend is rather varied although the frequency are upward to a certain point and downward from the peak onwards.

2. we can see if there is any correlation between a person's height and weight ...

54 2916 54 2916 55 3025 55 3025 55 3025 56 3136 56 3136 56 3136 56 3136 57 3249 58 3364 58 3364 58 3364 59 3481 59 3481 60 3600 60 3600 60 3600 60 3600 61 3721 62 3844 62 3844 64 4096 65 4225 67 4489

1. Comparing three newspapers using the percentage, cumulative frequency and box-plot

||||| ||||| ||||| 70 70 x100 = 10.4% 680 Adverts ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| |||||

2. Guesstiamte - investigating whether men or women between the ages of 15-25 are better ...

45, 45 Mean is 500 � 12 = 42� Median is 45� Mode is 45� Range is 20� Averages Tables Lines cm Mean Median Mode Range Men 5.4 4.7 4 9.5 Women 4.9 5 5 1 As the actual length of the line is 4.5cm the women's results are more

1. Stratified sampling and Hypotheses - ...

By using this method, the proportion of each strata in the sample will be more accurately matched to the proportion of each strata from the database. This would provide me with a more accurate sample to represent the entire database: Sample No.

2. Mayfield data

11: 170 Divided by 1183 Multiplied by 360 = 52 Degrees Total 360 Degrees Mean and Mode of Frequency Data I will now find the Mean, Median and Mode of the Frequency that I have found and this will be quick efficient and reliable and will help me gain evidence

1. For this investigation I have four hypotheses, which are: 1) ...

In this method of sampling there is a regular pattern created to choose the sample. All the results have to be listed for this to work. You first have to pick randomly a starting point and then every nth data is selected.

2. mayfeild statistics

Some of the points lie on the line of best fit which shows that there is a linear relationship between the two sets of data. I also found the equation of the line of best fit, which is y = 73.604x - 67.744.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to